邮件订阅 RSS

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

整形外科临床研究工具：患者报告结局测评量表及其应用

何乐人

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 协和医学杂志  > 2022 >  13(3): 383-386
何乐人. 整形外科临床研究工具：患者报告结局测评量表及其应用[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(3): 383-386. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0137
引用本文: 何乐人. 整形外科临床研究工具：患者报告结局测评量表及其应用[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(3): 383-386. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0137
shu
HE Leren. Clinical Research Tools for Plastic Surgery: Introduction of the Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Their Application[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(3): 383-386. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0137
Citation: HE Leren. Clinical Research Tools for Plastic Surgery: Introduction of the Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Their Application[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(3): 383-386. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0137
shu

整形外科临床研究工具：患者报告结局测评量表及其应用

doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0137

  • 中国医学科学院整形外科医院七科，北京 100144

基金项目: 

中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程临床与转化医学研究专项 2021-12M-C & T-B-075

首都卫生发展科研专项 2022-2-4042

详细信息
    作者简介:

    何乐人, E-mail: heleren@psh.pumc.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: R622

Clinical Research Tools for Plastic Surgery: Introduction of the Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Their Application

  • The Seventh Department, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100144, China

Funds: 

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2021-12M-C & T-B-075

Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research 2022-2-4042

More Information

    摘要
  • 摘要: 关于整形外科治疗结局的判定，无论是修复重建还是医疗美容，都高度关注形态的美化，但常无法用物理参数来衡量。如何清晰理解患者的诉求，正确进行医疗决策，是整形外科医生时常面临的问题。在这样的学科特征背景下，患者报告结局测评量表(patient reported outcome measures，PROMs)显得尤为重要。本文将介绍PROMs的发展历史及其在整形外科临床研究中的应用情况，以期为诊疗工作提供帮助。
    Abstract: Judgment about the outcome of plastic surgery, whether reconstruction or cosmetology, depends on the beautification of body image, which is difficult to be measured with physical parameters. How to exactly understand patients' perception and make correct medical decisions are everyday work of plastic surgeons. Hence patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are particularly important. In this paper, the author briefly described the development of PROMs, and introduced their application in plastic surgery, so as to provide reference for clinical research.
    利益冲突：作者声明不存在利益冲突
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(20)
  • [1] 廖江群, 何乐人. 从心理学视角看外表美[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2018, 34: 242-246. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2018.03.020
    [2] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2006, 4: 79.
    [3] Billig JI, Sears ED, Travis BN, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2020, 27: 56-64. doi:  10.1245/s10434-019-07748-3
    [4] Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years[J]. Med Care, 2007, 45: S3-S11.
    [5] 陈晓东, 陈刚, 王金明, 等. 整形美容人群中躯体变形障碍患病率的meta分析[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2021, 37: 380-387. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20201119-00584
    [6] 刘志荣, 彭歆, 章文博. 游离腓骨瓣和股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复单侧上颌骨缺损患者的生存质量问卷调查研究[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2018, 34: 644-647. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2018.08.014
    [7] 陈琳, 欧阳熠烨, 孙晶晶, 等. 乳房缺失患者生活质量与乳房再造手术相关性的量化研究[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2019, 35: 218-224.
    [8] 欧阳熠烨, 徐伯扬, 陈琳, 等. 腋窝入路内镜辅助背阔肌切取技术在修复Poland综合征胸壁畸形中的应用[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2020, 36: 1187-1193. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20200525-00319
    [9] 王祎, 穆籣, 李广学, 等. 54例乳房再造患者回顾性研究[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2019, 35: 225-231.
    [10] Revicki DA, Regulatory Issues and Patient-Reported Outcomes Task Force for the International Society for Quality of Life Research. FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research[J]. Lancet, 2007, 369: 540-542. doi:  10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60250-5
    [11] Pusic AL, Lemaine V, Klassen AF, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery: use and interpretation in evidence-based medicine[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2011, 127: 1361-1367. doi:  10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182063276
    [12] Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, et al. Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures[J]. BMJ, 2002, 324: 1417. doi:  10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1417
    [13] Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instru-ments: Attributes and review criteria[J]. Qual Life Res, 2002, 11: 193-205. doi:  10.1023/A:1015291021312
    [14] Harrison CJ, Rodrigues JN. How to interpret clinical outcome data in plastic surgery research and clinical practice[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2020, 73: 1409-1412. doi:  10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.055
    [15] Sharma K, Steele K, Birks M, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Plastic Surgery: An Introduction and Review of Clinical Applications[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2019, 83: 247-252. doi:  10.1097/SAP.0000000000001894
    [16] Dobbs TD, Hughes S, Mowbray N, et al. How to decide which patient-reported outcome measure to use? A practical guide for plastic surgeons[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2018, 71: 957-966. doi:  10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.007
    [17] Salem S, Salhi L, Seidel L, et al. Tunnel/Pouch versus Coronally Advanced Flap Combined with a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions: Four-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9: 2641. doi:  10.3390/jcm9082641
    [18] Harrison CJ, Rodrigues JN, Furniss D, et al. Optimising the computerised adaptive test to reliably reduce the burden of administering the CLEFT-Q: A Monte Carlo simulation study[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2021, 74: 1355-1401.
    [19] Malay S, Chung KC. How to use outcomes questionnaires: pearls and pitfalls[J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2013, 40: 261-269. doi:  10.1016/j.cps.2012.10.002
    [20] Sclafani AP, Pizzi L, Jutkowitz E, et al. FILLERS-Q: an instrument for assessing patient experiences after treatment with facial injectable soft tissue fillers[J]. Facial Plast Surg, 2010, 26: 310-319. doi:  10.1055/s-0030-1262315
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  130
  • HTML全文浏览量:  54
  • PDF下载量:  44
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-03-23
  • 录用日期:  2022-04-13
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-04-19
  • 刊出日期:  2022-05-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    友情链接: 国家卫生健康委员会 北京协和医院 中国医学科学院 学术不端检测系统 国际知识资源总库 中国知网 术语在线 中国全科医学
    地址：北京市东城区帅府园1号 北京协和医院老楼7号楼
    3层302室 《协和医学杂志》编辑部
    电话：010-69154261/4262
    E - mail：medj@pumch.cn
    mjpumch@126.com
    期刊网站版权所有：《协和医学杂志》编辑部
    京ICP备 11002662

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计

    x 关闭 永久关闭

    【通知】尊敬的读者、作者及编者：因特殊原因，本站自2022.9.30至10.24日期间实施6—24点开放，其他时段访问受限，给您带来不便敬请谅解！10.25日恢复如常。