| Citation: |
MAO Run, CAI Yiyuan, YANG Chengming, PENG Jinglan, NING Zhiqing, LIU Siyuan, XU Dong. Stakeholder Preference Assessment in Implementation Research[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(6): 1447-1455. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0576
|
In the process of conducting implementation research on health service issues, stakeholders' preference for contents related to evidence-based practice (EBP) and implementation strategies is closely related to whether EBP can be effectively implemented.However, multiple preference assessment methods exist, each with their own strengths, weaknesses, and application scenarios, which makes it challenging for researchers to select appropriate and effective preference assessment methods. This paper aims to review the origins, characteristics, and application scenarios of commonly used preference assessment methods, with the hope of providing valuable reference and lessons for domestic scholars to select and apply appropriate preference assessment methods in implementation research.
| [1] |
Irie W C, Kerkhoff A, Kim H Y, et al. Using stated preference methods to facilitate knowledge translation in implementation science[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2024, 5(1): 32. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00554-3
|
| [2] |
Wende M E, Wilcox S, Rhodes Z, et al. Developing criteria for research translation decision-making in community settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis informed by the Knowledge to Action Framework and community input[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2022, 3(1): 76. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00316-z
|
| [3] |
徐东, 陈江芸, 蔡毅媛. 实施科学的前世今生(上篇): 起源与发展[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2024, 15(2): 442-449.
Xu D, Chen J Y, Cai Y Y. Past and present of implementation science (part Ⅰ): Origin and development[J]. Med J PUMCH, 2024, 15(2): 442-449.
|
| [4] |
Pyo J, Lee W, Choi E Y, et al. Qualitative research in healthcare: necessity and characteristics[J]. J Prev Med Public Health, 2023, 56(1): 12-20. DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.22.451
|
| [5] |
Grisolía J M, Willis K G. Consumer choice of theatrical productions: a combined revealed preference-stated preference approach[J]. Empir Econ, 2016, 50(3): 933-957. DOI: 10.1007/s00181-015-0948-5
|
| [6] |
Zhang H P, Xie X X. Combining stated preference and revealed preference methods for the valuation of non-market goods[J]. Chin J Popul Resour Environ, 2012, 10(4): 121-126. DOI: 10.1080/10042857.2012.10685119
|
| [7] |
宋奎勐, 孟庆跃, Scott A, 等. 利用离散选择实验研究卫生服务人员工作偏好的国际研究进展[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2012, 31(10): 91-93.
Song K M, Meng Q Y, Scott A, et al. Analyzing health care providers' job preferences by discrete choice experiments: a literature review[J]. Chin Health Econ, 2012, 31(10): 91-93.
|
| [8] |
Cai Y Y, He H, Chen Z, et al. Shared Medical Appoint-ment for diabetes (SMART) in China: Design of an optimization trial[DB/OL]. (2024-03-21)[2024-07-25]. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3987350/v1.
|
| [9] |
张录法, 黄姣姣, 王慧, 等. 优劣尺度法理论及应用研究述评[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2019, 34(3): 24-30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2019.03.004
Zhang L F, Huang J J, Wang H, et al. An overview on theoretic and applied research of best-worst scaling[J]. J Stat Inf, 2019, 34(3): 24-30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3116.2019.03.004
|
| [10] |
Tringale M, Stephen G, Boylan A M, et al. Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence[J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(11): e067268. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268
|
| [11] |
Jimenez-Moreno A C, Van Overbeeke E, Pinto C A, et al. Patient preferences in rare diseases: a qualitative study in neuromuscular disorders to inform a quantitative preference study[J]. Patient, 2021, 14(5): 601-612. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00482-z
|
| [12] |
李清华. "经济人" 假设与经济学发展的新趋势[J]. 中国经济问题, 2013(2): 31-37.
Li Q H. The limitation of "hypothesis of economic man" and the transfer of economics research[J]. China Econ Stud, 2013(2): 31-37.
|
| [13] |
Dupuit J. De l'influence des péages sur l'utilité des voies de communication[M]. Paris: Carilian-Gœury, 1849: 185.
|
| [14] |
Gossen H H. Entwickelung der gesetze des menschlichen verkehrs: und der daraus fliessenden regeln für menschliche handeln[M]. RL Prager, 1927: 10-20.
|
| [15] |
Samuelson P A. A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour[J]. Economica, 1938, 5(17): 61-71. DOI: 10.2307/2548836
|
| [16] |
Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944: 16.
|
| [17] |
McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1974: 6-9.
|
| [18] |
Barry M J, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 366(9): 780-781. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283
|
| [19] |
Guyatt G H, Sinclair J, Cook D J, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation[J]. JAMA, 1999, 281(19): 1836-1843. DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.19.1836
|
| [20] |
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust[M]. Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, 2011: 10-11.
|
| [21] |
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2017年版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2017, 27(9): 695-759.
Breast cancer Professional Committee of China Anti Cancer Association. Guidelines and specifications for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment of China Anti Cancer Association (2017 Edition)[J]. China Oncol, 2017, 27(9): 695-759.
|
| [22] |
Swift J K, Mullins R H, Penix E A, et al. The importance of listening to patient preferences when making mental health care decisions[J]. World Psychiatry, 2021, 20(3): 316-317. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20912
|
| [23] |
Zeng L N, Helsingen L M, Bretthauer M, et al. A novel framework for incorporating patient values and preferences in making guideline recommendations: guideline panel surveys[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2023, 161: 164-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.003
|
| [24] |
Salloum R G, Bishop J R, Elchynski A L, et al. Best-worst scaling methodology to evaluate constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: application to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant therapy[J]. Implement Sci Commun, 2022, 3(1): 52. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00300-7
|
| [25] |
Williams N J, Candon M, Stewart R E, et al. Community stakeholder preferences for evidence-based practice implementation strategies in behavioral health: a best-worst scaling choice experiment[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2021, 21(1): 74. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03072-x
|
| [26] |
Siminoff L A. Incorporating patient and family preferences into evidence-based medicine[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2013, 13(S3): S6. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S3-S6
|
| [27] |
Van Egmond S, Wakkee M, Droger M, et al. Needs and preferences of patients regarding basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma care: a qualitative focus group study[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2019, 180(1): 122-129. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16900
|
| [28] |
Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) --explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force[J]. Value Health, 2013, 16(2): 231-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002
|
| [29] |
Bridges J F P, Hauber A B, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force[J]. Value Health, 2011, 14(4): 403-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013
|
| [30] |
Stampa E, Schipmann-Schwarze C, Hamm U. Consumer perceptions, preferences, and behavior regarding pasture-raised livestock products: a review[J]. Food Qual Prefer, 2020, 83: 103872.
|
| [31] |
Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob E W, Ellis A R, et al. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future[J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2019, 37(2): 201-226. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2
|
| [32] |
Wortley S, Tong A, Lancsar E, et al. Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2015, 15: 52. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-015-0176-0
|
| [33] |
Janus S I M, Weernink M G M, van Til J A, et al. A systematic review to identify the use of preference elicitation methods in health care decision making[J]. Value Health, 2014, 17(7): A515-A516.
|
| [34] |
Simonian M J, Brand D, Mason M A, et al. A systematic review of research evaluating the use of preference assessment methodology in the workplace[J]. J Organ Behav Manage, 2020, 40(3/4): 284-302.
|
| [35] |
Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, et al. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods[J]. J Health Econ, 1996, 15(2): 209-231. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00038-0
|
| [36] |
Flynn T N, Louviere J J, Peters T J, et al. Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it[J]. J Health Econ, 2007, 26(1): 171-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
|
| [37] |
Valet P, Sauer C, Tolsma J. Preferences for work arrangements: a discrete choice experiment[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(7): e0254483. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254483
|
| [38] |
Simms L J, Zelazny K, Williams T F, et al. Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspec-tives using personality questionnaire data[J]. Psychol Assess, 2019, 31(4): 557-566. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000648
|
| [39] |
Cleaver G. Ranking and rank-rating[M]//Kemp S E, Hort J, Hollowood T. Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018: 447-491.
|
| [40] |
Attema A E, Edelaar-Peeters Y, Versteegh M M, et al. Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods[J]. Eur J Health Econ, 2013, 14(S1): S53-S64. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0508-x
|
| [41] |
Taherdoost H, Madanchian M. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts[J]. Encyclopedia, 2023, 3(1): 77-87. DOI: 10.3390/encyclopedia3010006
|
| [42] |
郭亚军. 综合评价理论、方法及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 2-3.
Guo Y J. Theory, methods, and applications of comprehen-sive evaluation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2007: 2-3.
|
| [43] |
唐密, 杨燕, 胡善联, 等. 多准则决策分析应用于卫生决策的理论基础与进展[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2020, 23(4): 326-331.
Tang M, Yang Y, Hu S L, et al. Theoretical basis and progress of multi-criteria decision analysis in healthcare decision-making[J]. Chin Health Resour, 2020, 23(4): 326-331.
|
| [44] |
徐玖平, 李军. 多目标决策的理论与方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2005: 211-215.
Xu J P, Li J. Multiple objective decision making theory and methods[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005: 211-215.
|
| [45] |
Jendle J, Torffvit O, Ridderstråle M, et al. Willingness to pay for health improvements associated with anti-diabetes treatments for people with type 2 diabetes[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2010, 26(4): 917-923. DOI: 10.1185/03007991003657867
|
| [46] |
顾文勇, 蒋明珠, 沈晓, 等. 基于优差测度法的慢性病患者对慢性病医防融合服务的偏好及支付意愿研究[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2022, 39(6): 720-724. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5625.2022.06.026
Gu W Y, Jiang M Z, Shen X, et al. Study on the preference and willingness to pay of chronic disease patients to medical and prevention fusion service: based on best worst scaling method[J]. Chin J Soc Med, 2022, 39(6): 720-724. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5625.2022.06.026
|
| [47] |
严豪, 陈思思, 聂瀚林, 等. 基层卫生技术人员中医药适宜技术使用偏好研究: 基于离散选择实验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(16): 1958-1964. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0683
Yan H, Chen S S, Nie H L, et al. Preferences for the use of appropriate TCM techniques among primary health workers: a discrete-choice experiment-based study[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2023, 26(16): 1958-1964. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0683
|
| [48] |
Weber S. A step-by-step procedure to implement discrete choice experiments in qualtrics[J]. Soc Sci Comput Rev, 2021, 39(5): 903-921. DOI: 10.1177/0894439319885317
|
| [49] |
Hennink M, Kaiser B N. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2022, 292: 114523. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
|
| [50] |
Mühlbacher A C, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, et al. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview[J]. Health Econ Rev, 2016, 6(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x
|
| [51] |
Potoglou D, Burge P, Flynn T, et al. Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2011, 72(10): 1717-1727. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.027
|
| [52] |
Whitty J A, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, et al. Australian public preferences for the funding of new health technologies: a comparison of discrete choice and profile case best-worst scaling methods[J]. Med Decis Making, 2014, 34(5): 638-654. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14526640
|
| [53] |
Mangham L J, Hanson K, McPake B. How to do (or not to do). . . Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country[J]. Health Policy Plan, 2009, 24(2): 151-158. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czn047
|
| [54] |
Toll K, Spark L, Neo B, et al. Consumer preferences, experiences, and attitudes towards telehealth: Qualitative evidence from Australia[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(8): e0273935. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273935
|
| [55] |
Lipman S A, Brouwer W B F, Attema A E. Living up to expectations: experimental tests of subjective life expectancy as reference point in time trade-off and standard gamble[J]. J Health Econ, 2020, 71: 102318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102318
|
| [56] |
叶静陶, 卓琳, 王国威, 等. VAS、TTO、SG方法在EQ-5D生命质量测量中的差异及其消除研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(1): 14-17.
Ye J T, Zhuo L, Wang G W, et al. Study on the difference and its elimination of VAS, TTO and SG in EQ-5D quality of life measurement[J]. Chin J Health Stat, 2018, 35(1): 14-17.
|
| [57] |
Kim S H, Lee S I, Jo M W. Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population[J]. Qual Life Res, 2017, 26(12): 3387-3397. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1676-4
|
| [58] |
Gafni A. Standard gamble technique[M]//Armitage P, Colton T. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005: 1-4.
|
| [59] |
Puhan M A, Schünemann H J, Wong E, et al. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007, 60(10): 1029-1033. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.001
|
| [60] |
Slaughter K B, Meyer E G, Bambhroliya A B, et al. Direct assessment of health utilities using the standard gamble among patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2019, 12(9): e005606. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005606
|
| [61] |
Almli V L, Øvrum A, Hersleth M, et al. Investigating individual preferences in rating and ranking conjoint experi-ments. A case study on semi-hard cheese[J]. Food Qual Prefer, 2015, 39: 28-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.011
|
| [62] |
Pouls B P H, Kristensen L E, Petersson M, et al. A pilot study examining patient preference and satisfaction for ava®, a reusable electronic injection device to administer certolizumab pegol[J]. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2020, 17(5): 705-711. DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1736552
|
| [63] |
Farmakas A, Theodorou M, Galanis P, et al. Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus[J]. Cost Eff Resour Alloc, 2017, 15: 16. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-017-0078-3
|
| [64] |
周挺, 马爱霞. 不同时间权衡法在健康效用值研究中的应用[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2017 (1): 18-20.
Zhou T, Ma A X. Application of different time trade off methods in health utility studies[J]. Chin Health Econ, 2017, 36(1): 18-20.
|
| [65] |
Schey C, Postma M J, Krabbe P, et al. Assessing the Preferences for Criteria in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Treatments for Rare Diseases[J]. Front Public Health, 2020, 8: 162. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00162
|
| [66] |
李文姣, 宁允, 程侣, 等. 离散选择实验在护理领域的应用与展望[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(4): 97-100. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.04.097
Li W J, Ning Y, Cheng L, et al. Application and prospects of discrete choice experiment in nursing field[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2020, 35(4): 97-100. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.04.097
|
| [67] |
Clark M D, Determann D, Petrou S, et al. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature[J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2014, 32(9): 883-902. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x
|
| [68] |
Lin Y, Xie J, Wu D, et al. Job preferences of Chinese primary health care workers: A discrete choice experiment[J]. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2024, 29(2): 84-91. DOI: 10.1177/13558196231219386
|
| [69] |
van Dijk J D, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C G, Marshall D A, et al. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery[J]. Value Health, 2016, 19(4): 316-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.020
|
| [70] |
Aizaki H, Fogarty J. An Rpackage and tutorial for case 2 best-worst scaling[J]. J Choice Model, 2019, 32: 100171. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100171
|
| [71] |
Cheung K L, Wijnen B F M, Hollin I L, et al. Using best-worst scaling to investigate preferences in health care[J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2016, 34(12): 1195-1209. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0429-5
|
| [72] |
Mühlbacher A C, Sadler A, Lamprecht B, et al. Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: A best-worst scaling case 3 analysis[J]. Value in Health, 2020, 23(7): 862-869. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.02.013
|
| [1] | DAI Xiaoyan, YAN Jing, WANG Youpei, NING Xiaohong. Changes in the Death Status of End-of-life Patients After Concept Promotion and Practice of Palliative Care[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(1): 84-88. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0648 |
| [2] | YU Shiying. Controversies About Palliative Care[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(1): 37-41. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0537 |
| [3] | ZHANG Di, BI Kejia, XU Shiting. Ethical Issues in Palliative Care[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(1): 24-31. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0578 |
| [4] | Krakauer Eric L.. How to Respond Responsibly to Suffering of Others? Rethinking Palliative Care for China[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(1): 7-11. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0613 |
| [5] | SUN Yan. Palliative Care: From the Perspective of Clinical Oncology[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(1): 3-6. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0521 |
| [6] | LANG Jinghe. Palliative Care: Understanding and Responsibility[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(1): 1-2. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0469 |
| [7] | ZHANG Di, NING Xiaohong. Ethical Arguments for Withdrawing Life-sustaining Medical Intervention[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(5): 1116-1122. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0332 |
| [8] | XIE Jing, LI Shu, ZHU Ling, ZHANG Shuyang. Autonomy of Patients and Informed Consent in Clinical Practice[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(1): 147-151. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0007 |
| [9] | LI Ji, YOU Wen, LIU Shuang, RUAN Ge-chong, XU Tian-ming, ZHANG Run-feng, ZHANG Xin-qing, QIAN Jia-ming. Clarify and Resolve Ethical Issues in the Teaching of Clinical Practice Based on the Four-topics Theory——An Example of Patients' Refusal to the Practice of Medical Students[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(2): 282-286. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.20200135 |
| [10] | XIE Jing, WU Dong, ZHANG Shu-yang. Public Health Ethics and Clinical Practice in the Context of Response to the Outbreak of an Infectious Disease[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(1): 141-145. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.20200249 |
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
Submit
Review
Office
Email Alert
RSS
DownLoad: