ZHAO Na, LI Xiaoguang, WANG Sujie, XU Tao, BAI Yunbo, XU Mingjun. The Influence of Epidural Local Anesthetics Consumption Volume during Labor Analgesia on the Effect of Epidural Anesthesia When Undergoing Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(3): 339-345. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2020-0076
Citation: ZHAO Na, LI Xiaoguang, WANG Sujie, XU Tao, BAI Yunbo, XU Mingjun. The Influence of Epidural Local Anesthetics Consumption Volume during Labor Analgesia on the Effect of Epidural Anesthesia When Undergoing Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(3): 339-345. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2020-0076

The Influence of Epidural Local Anesthetics Consumption Volume during Labor Analgesia on the Effect of Epidural Anesthesia When Undergoing Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery

Funds: 

Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University FCYYQN-201909

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    XU Mingjun Tel: 86-10-52273799, E-mail: xumingjun1339@ccmu.edu.cn

  • Received Date: December 21, 2020
  • Accepted Date: January 24, 2021
  • Issue Publish Date: May 29, 2021
  •   Objective  To investigate the influence of epidural local anesthetics consumption volume (ELACV) during neuraxial labor analgesia on the effect of epidural anesthesia when undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery.
      Methods  Parturients undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery after neuraxial labor analgesia were prospectively recruited in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University from May 2019 to February 2020. Using the average amount (60 mL) of ELACV of all the parturients as the cut-off in our study, we divided the parturients into the high volume group (ELACV≥60 mL) and the low volume group (ELACV < 60 mL). Epidural anesthesia was performed by a top-up of the epidural catheter, which was introduced during the labor, with the experimental dose of 1.5% lidocaine 3 mL and a mixture of 10~20 mL of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% ropivacaine. The failure rate and effect of epidural anesthesia were compared between the two groups.
      Results  A total of 36 parturients who met the selection and exclusion criteria were enrolled. There were 17 cases in the high volume group and 19 cases in the low volume group. The failure rate of the high volume group was significantly higher than that of the low volume group (23.5% vs. 0, P=0.040). There was no significant difference in the local anesthetics consumption during cesarean delivery (P=0.057), the length of time from the first epidural top-up dose to skin incision (P=0.290), and the length of time from the first epidural top-up dose to the end of surgery (P=0.748) between the two groups. All surgeries were successfully completed (4 cases, who suffered failure of epidural anesthesia, were converted to combined spinal epidural anesthesia) with neither maternal nor neonatal adverse events. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the level of sensory block at the 10 minutes after the first epidural top-up dose was significantly correlated with the ELACV (r=0.509, P=0.003), but not linearly correlated with the ELACV per hour (r=0.272, P=0.125). In the high volume group, the level of sensory block at the 10 minutes after the first epidural top-up dose[T9 (T6, T9) vs. T6 (T4, T7), P=0.048] and the grade of motor block at the end of surgery[1(0, 1) vs. 2(1, 3), P=0.034] on the right side of the body were lower than those in the low volume group. The difference of the proportion of parturients who complained of discomfort during muscle separation after skin incision (23.1% vs. 0, P=0.058) and discomfort during abdominal exploration (30.8% vs. 15.8%, P=0.401) was not statistically significant between the high volume group and the low volume group.
      Conclusion  In the parturients, who need intrapartum cesarean delivery after neuraxial analgesia, the larger the volume of local anesthetics consumed during labor analgesia, the greater the chance of failure and poor effect during conversion of epidural analgesia to epidural anesthesia.
  • [1]
    Mankowitz SK, Gonzalez Fiol A, Smiley R. Failure to Extend Epidural Labor Analgesia for Cesarean Delivery Anesthesia: A Focused Review[J]. Anesth Analg, 2016, 123: 1174-1180. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001437
    [2]
    Bhalotra AR. Let us not discard a preexisting epidural catheter for intrapartum cesarean section yet![J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2018, 71: 244-245. DOI: 10.4097/kja.d.17.00017
    [3]
    Lee S, Lew E, Lim Y, et al. Failure of augmentation of labor epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean delivery: a retrospective review[J]. Anesth Analg, 2009, 108: 252-254. DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181900260
    [4]
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Classification of urgency of caesarean section-a continuum of risk[EB/OL ]. [2010-04]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/goodpractice11classifica-tionofurgency.pdf.
    [5]
    Desai N, Gardner A, Carvalho B. Labor Epidural Analgesia to Cesarean Section Anesthetic Conversion Failure: A National Survey[J]. Anesthesiol Res Pract, 2019, 2019: 6381792. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/333386436_Labor_epidural_analgesia_to_cesarean_section_anesthetic_conversion_failure_a_national_survey
    [6]
    Yoon HJ, Do SH, Yun YJ. Comparing epidural surgical anesthesia and spinal anesthesia following epidural labor analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2017, 70: 412-419. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.4.412
    [7]
    Purva M. Cesarean section anesthesia: technique and failurerate[M]. 3rd ed. London: Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2012: 220.
    [8]
    Haller G, Stoelwinder J, Myles PS, et al. Quality and safety indicators in anesthesia: a systematic review[J]. Anesthesiology, 2009, 110: 1158-1175. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a1093b
    [9]
    Bjornestad EE, Haney MF. An obstetric anaesthetist-A key to successful conversion of epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for caesarean delivery[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2020, 64: 142-144. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13493
    [10]
    Clive Collier. Epidural Anaesthesia: Images, Problems and Solutions[M]. Syndey: CRC Press, 2012: 1-6.
    [11]
    Bauer ME, Kountanis JA, Tsen LC, et al. Risk factors for failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational trials[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2012, 21: 294-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.05.007
    [12]
    Shen C, Chen L, Yue C, et al. Extending epidural analgesia for intrapartum cesarean section following epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2020, 23: 1-7. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1743661
    [13]
    胡进前, 罗爱林, 万里, 等. 58例腰硬联合阻滞分娩镇痛试产失败中转剖宫产病例的麻醉处理[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2019, 22: 123-126.

    Hu JQ, Luo AL, Wan L, et al. Anesthesia for cesarean section after failed labor under combined spinal and epidural analgesia: analysis of 58 cases[J]. Zhonghua Wei Chan Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2019, 22: 123-126.
    [14]
    Palanisamy A, Mitani AA, Tsen LC. General anaesthesia for caesarean delivery at a tertiary care hospital from 2000-2005: a retrospective analysis and 10 years update[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2011, 20: 10-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.002
    [15]
    Cambell DC, Tran T. Conversion of labor epidural analgesia to anesthesia for intrapartum Caesarean delivery[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2009, 56: 19-26. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-008-9004-7
  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Rong. Interpretation on the 2023 Chinese Menopause Symptom Management and Menopausal Hormone Therapy Guidelines[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(3): 514-519. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0190
    [2]CHEN Chen, LONG Qin. Bandage Contact Lenses Improve Clinical Symptoms and Quality of Life After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(3): 449-454. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0342
    [3]RUAN Xiang-yan, WANG Yue-jiao. Rational Evaluation of Menopausal Hormone Therapy and the Risk of Breast Cancer[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(2): 163-166. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.20200281
    [4]ZHOU Wen-jie, WU Jie. Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Female Cancer[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(2): 157-162. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.20200285
    [5]XIE Mei-qing, XIE Xiao-qian. Benefits and Risks of Menopausal Hormone Therapy[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(2): 151-156. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0130
    [6]Ying XU, Ya-li XU, Zhe WANG, Yan LIN, Chang-jun WANG, Qiang SUN. Menopausal Hormone Therapy Increases the Risk of Breast Cancer:Interpretation on an Article Published in the Lancet Sep. 2019[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(5): 621-625. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2020.05.020
    [7]Xue-feng SUN, Jin-yu LI, Ju-hong SHI. Quality of Life in Patients with Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Its Determinants[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(2): 133-137. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.02.009
    [8]Qi YU. 2018 Chinese Guideline on Menopause Management and Menopause Hormone Therapy[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2018, 9(6): 512-525. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.06.007
    [9]Ying XU, Yan LIN, Chang-jun WANG, Qiang SUN. Consensus and Controversy: Menopausal Hormone Therapy and the Risk of Breast Carcinoma[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2018, 9(4): 332-335. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.04.008
    [10]Ying Liu, Hong Zhao, Jianping Zhang, Jinling Zhao, Xiaojuan Zhao, Lixia Chen. Relationship between Quality of Life and Joint Health in Hemophilic Children[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2017, 8(1): 35-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2017.01.008
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 张东梅,黄玉葵,郑文金,詹凤丽,曾文振,周利锴. 南宁市围绝经期女性对围绝经期知识认知的现状调查. 中国妇幼保健. 2024(10): 1825-1828 .
    2. 史碧容,杨道秀,张辉,崔菊远,姚望,吴晓霞,廖小琴,杨长琼,孙晓莺. 恩施市基层医务人员对绝经及其治疗的认知现况调查与分析. 全科医学临床与教育. 2022(06): 552-554 .
    3. 丁鲡,谢莉玲,王富兰,周勤,孙文静. 临床护士围绝经期综合征风险预测模型的构建及验证. 护理研究. 2022(16): 2860-2866 .
    4. 丁鲡,谢莉玲,周勤. 不同等级医院护士围绝经期综合征现状调查及影响因素分析. 护理学杂志. 2022(20): 76-80 .
    5. 李阳美,陈怡帆,戴安琪,王佳茜,王春媛,李欣悦,曾婷婷,徐驰宇,黄娟,奚鑫,邹密,范尧,俞丽丽,周明芳,雷迅. 更年期“一日门诊”持续性综合管理参与者的真实体验研究. 全科护理. 2022(35): 5011-5014 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (691) PDF downloads (47) Cited by(6)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close