CHEN Chen, LONG Qin. Bandage Contact Lenses Improve Clinical Symptoms and Quality of Life After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(3): 449-454. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0342
Citation: CHEN Chen, LONG Qin. Bandage Contact Lenses Improve Clinical Symptoms and Quality of Life After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(3): 449-454. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0342

Bandage Contact Lenses Improve Clinical Symptoms and Quality of Life After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Funds: 

National Nature Science Foundation of China 81870685

Natural Science Foundation of Beijing 7172173

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    LONG Qin, E-mail: longqinbj@hotmail.com

  • Received Date: April 16, 2021
  • Accepted Date: October 10, 2021
  • Issue Publish Date: May 29, 2022
  •   Objective  To explore the effect of wearing bandage contact lenses(BCL) on the clinical symptoms and quality of life of patients after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
      Methods  Patients with myopic or myopic astigmatism who underwent SMILE in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from Januaryto May 2019 were collected. According to the postoperative treatment methods, they were divided into the study group and the control group. The study group wore BCL immediately after SMILE, while the control group wore transparent eye patches routinely. BLC or the transparent eye patch was removed on the first day after surgery. The severity and duration of postoperative pain, photophobia, tearing, blurred vision and other clinical symptoms, the impact of pain on quality of life, postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, non-contact intraocular pressure, spherical equivalent, overall surgical satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Meanwhile, BCL adverse reactions was recorded.
      Results  Severity scores of pain [0.2(0, 1.1) vs. 1.1(0.5, 2.1), P=0.007] and photophobia [1.0(0, 2.0) vs. 2.0(0.8, 2.3), P=0.032] as well as the duration of pain [0(0, 1.0) h vs. 2.0(0, 6.3) h, P=0.014] and photophobia [0(0, 1.0) h vs. 2.0(0, 4.3) h, P=0.006] at 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the study group than those in the control group. There were no significant differences in the severity scores and duration of tears and blurred vision at 24 h postoperatively between the two groups(all P > 0.05). At 24 h after SMILE, the effects of pain on activity, sleep and the relationship with others were lower in the study group than those in the control group(all P < 0.05). At 7 d postoperatively, the score of overall satisfaction to the surgery of the study group was not significantly different from that of the control group[10.0(9.0, 10.0) vs. 10.0(9.0, 10.0), P=0.617]. There were no significant differences in postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, non-contact intraocular pressure, and spherical equivalent on days 1, 2, and 7 days after SMILE between the two groups (all P > 0.05). BCL related adverse effects (bulbar conjunctival hyperemia) occurred in two patients. The symptoms gradually improved after BCL removal, and the postoperative uncorrected visual acuity recovered to the best-corrected preoperative visual acuity at 7 d after surgery.
      Conclusions  The application of BCL after SMILE can reduce the degree and duration of postoperative pain and photophobia, and improve the postoperative quality of life to a certain extent.
  • [1]
    Titiyal JS, Kaur M, Shaikh F, et al. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) techniques: patient selection and perspectives[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2018, 12: 1685-1699. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S157172
    [2]
    侯杰, 雷玉琳, 饶丰, 等. 角膜地形图与调制传递函数测量SMILE矫治近视术后有效光学区的比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2021, 39: 126-132. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20201120-00785
    [3]
    Zheng Z, Zhang M, Jhanji V, et al. Comparison between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism[J]. Int Ophthalmol, 2021, 41: 303-314. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01582-3
    [4]
    Ganesh S, Brar S, Arra RR. Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2018, 66: 10-19. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_761_17
    [5]
    张文文, 蔡剑茹, 程新梁, 等. SMILE和SBK术后角膜前表面形态的变化[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志, 2017, 19: 421-427. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2017.07.007
    [6]
    Liu T, Dan T, Luo Y. Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: First 24-Hour Outcomes[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2017, 2017: 5824534.
    [7]
    Zhao LQ, Li LM, Liu J, et al. Bandage Contact Lens Application Reduces Fibrotic Wound Healing of Flap Margins after FS-LASIK: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. J Ophthalmol, 2019, 2019: 3074659.
    [8]
    Wu YT, Ho A, Naduvilath T, et al. The risk of vision loss in contact lens wear and following LASIK[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 2020, 40: 241-248. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12663
    [9]
    中华医学会眼科学分会眼视光组. 我国飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出手术规范专家共识(2018年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2018, 54: 729-736. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2018.10.003
    [10]
    Porela-Tiihonen S, Kaarniranta K, Kokki M, et al. A prospective study on postoperative pain after cataract surgery[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2013, 7: 1429-1435.
    [11]
    毕婷, 张会君. 生活质量在中老年青光眼患者疼痛与焦虑之间中介效应[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2017, 33: 509-512. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2017-33-03-45
    [12]
    Pereira V, Garcia R, Torricelli A, et al. Codeine Plus Acetaminophen for Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Add-On Trial[J]. Cornea, 2017, 36: 1206-1212. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001328
    [13]
    Lievens CW, Norgett Y, Briggs N, et al. Natural course of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) in symptomatic contact lens wearers[J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2022, 45: 101529. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101529
    [14]
    Sandvik GF, Rand-Hendriksen S, Drolsum L, et al. Photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: a case-control study[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2022, 100: 337-343. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14935
    [15]
    Asakawa K, Kanno S, Ando T, et al. The Effects of Chewing Gum in Preventing Eyestrain[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2020, 2020: 2470473.
    [16]
    许正华, 张小玲, 刘毅, 等. 绷带镜在翼状胬肉切除联合结膜瓣移植术后的应用[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2017, 17: 1786-1789. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2017.9.49
    [17]
    Wen D, Tu R, Flitcroft I, et al. Corneal Surface Ablation Laser Refractive Surgery for the Correction of Myopia: A Network Meta-analysis[J]. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34: 726-735. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20180905-01
    [18]
    Luft N, Schumann RG, Dirisamer M, et al. Wound Heal-ing, Inflammation, and Corneal Ultrastructure After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK: A Human Ex Vivo Study[J]. J Refract Surg, 2018, 34: 393-399. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20180425-02
    [19]
    Liu L, Cheng W, Wu D, et al. The Differential Expression of Cytokines and Growth Factors After SMILE Compared With FS-LASIK in Rabbits[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2020, 61: 55.
    [20]
    Wen D, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, et al. Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2017, 178: 65-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013
    [21]
    Mastropasqua L, Calienno R, Curcio C, et al. In Vivo and Ex Vivo Evaluation of Inflammation and Apoptosis Induced after SMILE Procedures for Different Refractive Error Range[J]. Curr Eye Res, 2017, 42: 701-707. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2016.1231324
    [22]
    Szaflik JP, Ambroziak AM, Szaflik J. Therapeutic use of a lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel soft contact lens as a bandage after LASEK surgery[J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2004, 30: 59-62. DOI: 10.1097/01.ICL.0000107181.42704.D8
    [23]
    Ortega-Usobiaga J, Baviera-Sabater J, Llovet-Osuna F, et al. Outcomes of Flap Lift Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Enhancements in a Large Patient Population: Does Application of a Bandage Contact Lens Affect Incidence of Epithelial Ingrowth?[J]. Cornea, 2019, 38: 1531-1535. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002132
    [24]
    Sekundo W, Dick HB, Meyer CH. Benefits and side effects of bandage soft contact lens application after LASIK: a prospective randomized study[J]. Ophthalmology, 2005, 112: 2180-2183. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.032
    [25]
    中国健康管理协会接触镜安全监控与视觉健康专业委员会. 中国治疗用绷带镜临床应用专家共识(2019年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志, 2019, 55: 405-412. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.06.002
    [26]
    Vidal-Rohr M, Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, et al. Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort, tear stability and ocular physiology[J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2018, 41: 117-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.09.009
    [27]
    AlDahash F, AlAmeer A, Hussain OB, et al. Effect of Bandage Contact Lens Exchange on Pain and Healing After Photorefractive Keratectomy-A Randomized Control Trial[J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2021, 47: 113-117. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000730
    [28]
    Seguí-Crespo M, Parra Picó J, Ruíz Fortes P, et al. Usefulness of bandage contact lenses in the immediate postoperative period after uneventful myopic LASIK[J]. Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 2018, 41: 187-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.11.006
    [29]
    Zhu B, Liu Y, Lin L, et al. Characteristics of Infectious Keratitis in Bandage Contact Lens Wear Patients[J]. Eye Contact Lens, 2019, 45: 356-359. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000593
    [30]
    Orucov F, Frucht-Pery J, Raiskup FD, et al. Quantitative assessment of bandage soft contact lens wear immediately after LASIK[J]. J Refract Surg, 2010, 26: 744-748. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20091209-04
  • Related Articles

    [1]GONG Liyun, WANG Xiaomei, PENG Guoqing, YU Huan, TAO Xiaoman. Reporting Guidelines for Healthcare Guideline Adaptations: An Interpretation of the RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2025, 16(1): 204-215. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0063
    [2]LIANG Yan. Interpretation on the 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(2): 312-319. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0043
    [3]YANG Xiaoxi, TIAN Xinping, LI Mengtao, LENG Xiaomei, ZHAO Yan, ZENG Xiaofeng. Interpretation on the Consensus on Targeted Drug Therapy for Spondyloarthritis[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(1): 58-67. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0391
    [4]WANG Yongxuan, LI Mei, ZHANG Zhenlin, XIA Weibo. Interpretation on the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Osteoporosis (2022)[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(6): 1203-1207. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0364
    [5]CHEN Rong. Interpretation on the 2023 Chinese Menopause Symptom Management and Menopausal Hormone Therapy Guidelines[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(3): 514-519. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0190
    [6]LIU Yuan, ZHAO Lin. Update and Interpretation of 2022 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(6): 999-1004. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0271
    [7]WU Juelun, SHEN Le. Evaluation, Preparation, Decision, and Oxygenation: Interpretation on 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(3): 421-426. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0075
    [8]WANG Zi-jun, ZHOU Qi, XING Dan, YANG Nan, LUO Xu-fei, ZHANG Jing-yi, SHI Qian-ling, ZHAO Si-ya, LIU Hui, LIU Xiao, LI Qin-yuan, DU Liang, YANG Ke-hu, CHEN Yao-long. Reporting Quality of Literature Interpreting Clinical Practice Guidelines/Consensus: A Cross-sectional Study[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(2): 260-267. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.20200250
    [9]Xiao-dong TIAN, Yin-mo YANG. Concept Renewal Leads to Behavior Progress: Interpretation on the Surgical Part of Consensus on ERAS and Guidelines for Pathway Management in China (2018)[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2018, 9(6): 485-489. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.06.002
    [10]Tian-long WANG, Yu-guang HUANG. Campaigning for the Transformation from Anesthesiology to Perioperative Medicine: Interpretation on the Anesthesia Part of Consensus on ERAS and Guidelines for the Pathway Management in China (2018)[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2018, 9(6): 481-484. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.06.001
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (831) PDF downloads (48) Cited by(1)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close