中国人重睑宽度及形态的美学探索:一项基于问卷的调查研究

Aesthetic Investigation of the Pretarsal Shows and Morphology of Double Eyelids in Chinese Populations: A Questionnaire-based Survey

  • 摘要:
    目的 通过问卷调查探究中国人认为的重睑的理想宽度和形态学特征。
    方法 本研究采用便利抽样法,以中国籍且无外国久居史(国外累计居住时间1年以上)的成年人作为主要调查对象。2023年11月—2024年5月通过发送电子问卷的形式展开调查,收集调查对象对9张不同眶周图像(包括1张单睑图像及8张具有不同宽度和形态的重睑图像)的吸引力评分,并通过全人群分析及按性别、年龄组、职业等因素进行分层比较,确定最理想的重睑宽度与形态。对9张图像的重睑美学特征进行定量分析,以对问卷调查结果进行验证和解释。
    结果 共493人填写问卷,经质量筛选后共纳入397份有效问卷进行数据分析。全人群分析时,宽度为2 mm重睑图像的评分最高,内折型为(3.72±0.97)分,外折型为(3.65±1.04)分,最具吸引力。其次是宽度为1 mm、3 mm重睑图像和单睑图像,宽度为4 mm重睑图像的评分最低。对不同形态重睑图像进行比较后发现,宽度相同时,内折型重睑图像评分均高于外折型,但仅重睑宽度为3 mm和4 mm时差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。按性别、年龄组、职业等因素进行分层分析,其结果与全人群基本一致。重睑美学特征定量分析发现,宽度为2 mm时,内折型和外折型重睑图像的陈氏比例均为0.630,最接近黄金比例。
    结论 宽度为2 mm的内折型或外折型重睑可能是中国人认为最为理想的重睑,该发现对于重睑手术规划、效果评估及与重睑成形术相关的其他眶周手术设计等均具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the ideal pretarsal shows and morphological characteristics of double eyelids in Chinese populations through a morphometric analysis.
    Methods This study employed a convenience sampling method to survey Chinese adults who did not reside abroad for an extended period (with cumulative overseas stay of over one year). From November 2023 to May 2024, electronic questionnaires were distributed to collect attractiveness ratings of nine different images (including one image featuring single eyelid and eight images with varying pretarsal shows and morphologies of double eyelids). Stratified comparisons were conducted based on gender, age, occupation, etc., to determine the ideal pretarsal show and morphology of double eyelids. Quantitative analysis was performed on the aesthetic features of the nine images depicting double eyelids to validate and elucidate the survey findings.
    Results A total of 493 questionnaires were filled out, and 397 valid questionnaires were included for data analysis after quality control. As for the whole cohort, the images feathering 2 mm double eyelid were deemed to be the most attractive, with the in-fold type scoring (3.72±0.97) points and the out-fold type scoring (3.65±1.04) points. The next was 1 mm, followed by 3 mm, single eyelid, and finally, 4 mm. As for morphology, in-fold type achieved higher scores than out-fold type in images with the same pretarsal show. However, statistically significant differences were only found in ratings for the images with 3 mm and 4 mm double eyelids (all P < 0.05). Stratified analysis based on gender, age, occupation, and other factors yielded results that were largely consistent with those of the overall population.The quantitative analysis of aesthetic characteristics of double eyelids revealed that when the pretarsal show was 2 mm, both the Chen's ratio of the in-fold and out-fold type were 0.630, which closely approximates the golden ratio.
    Conclusions This study validates that the pretarsal show of 2 mm and the presence of either an in-fold or out-fold morphology are considered optimal for double eyelids among Chinese individuals. These findings hold significant implications for the planning of double eyelid surgeries, assessment of surgical outcomes, and evaluation of other periocular procedures associated with double eyelid surgeries.

     

/

返回文章
返回