6种妊娠期高血压疾病不良结局预测模型在中国东西部地区人群中的验证

Validation of Six Predictive Models for Adverse Outcomes of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Eastern and Western China

  • 摘要:
      目的  探究国内外文献报道的6种妊娠期高血压疾病(hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, HDP)不良结局预测模型在中国东西部地区人群中的应用价值。
      方法  回顾性分析2011年5月1日至2019年4月30日于苏州大学附属第一医院、四川省妇幼保健院分娩且入院诊断为HDP的所有患者临床资料。采用fullPIERS、miniPIERS、Zwertbroek、PREP、Ngwenya、马国珺等模型对不良结局风险进行预测,并从区分度和校准度两个方面评估模型的预测性能。
      结果  共入选符合纳入和排除标准的HDP患者2978例,其中苏州大学附属第一医院1492例,四川省妇幼保健院1486例。住院期间共655例(22.0%)患者发生不良结局事件,其中405例(13.6%)发生于入院48 h内;孕<34周分娩(49.4%, 200/405)、需输血治疗(43.5%, 176/405)、胎盘早剥(23.5%, 95/405)是入院48 h内最常见的不良结局事件。6种模型预测HDP患者入院48 h内/住院期间发生不良结局的曲线下面积分布于0.600~0.897,灵敏度分布于57.1%~69.5%,特异度分布于60.1%~76.6%。Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验显示,除PREP模型(该模型的验证人群较少,未进行校准度评估)外,其他5种模型的P值均小于0.05。
      结论  6种预测模型在中国东西部地区HDP患者不良结局预测中均有一定应用价值,但拟合性欠佳,且部分模型涉及的预测因子并非常规检查指标,模型大范围开展的可行性有待商榷。需基于中国人群的临床特征,建立更适合本土使用的HDP不良结局预测模型。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To explore the application value of six prediction models reported at home and abroad for adverse outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy(HDP) in eastern and western China.
      Methods  For all patients who delivered in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Sichuan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from May 1, 2011 to April 30, 2019 and were diagnosed with HDP, their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Six models, fullPIERS, miniPIERS, Zwertbroek, PREP, Ngwenya, and Ma Guojun, were used to predict the risk of adverse outcomes for the patients. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration.
      Results  A total of 2978 patients were eligible. Combined adverse outcomes occurred in 13.6% (405/2978) of women within 48 h of admission, and 22.0% (655/2978) at any time during admission. The delivery < 34 weeks (49.4%, 200/405), need for blood product transfusion (43.5%, 176/405), and placental abruption (23.5%, 95/405) were the most common adverse outcomes within 48 hours of admission. The area under of the curve of the six models for predicting adverse outcomes in the patients with HDP within 48 hours of admission/during hospitalization ranged from 0.600 to 0.897, the sensitivity ranged from 57.1% to 69.5%, and the specificity ranged from 60.1% to 76.6%. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that except for the PREP model (which had a small validation population and was not evaluated for calibration), the P-values of all the other 5 models were less than 0.05.
      Conclusions  The six prediction models have certain application value in the prediction of adverse outcomes of HDP patients in the eastern and western regions of China, but the fitting is poor. The predictors involved in some models are not routine inspection indicators, and the feasibility of large-scale model application is still open to question. It is still necessary to establish a better prognostic model suitable for local areas based on Chinese characteristics.

     

/

返回文章
返回