基于“四主题理论”的慢性肾衰竭诊疗伦理问题分析——以慢性肾衰竭患者拒绝血液透析为例

Analyze Clinical Ethical Issues in the Treatments of Chronic Renal Failure Based on Four Topics Theory: An Example of a Patient with Chronic Renal Failure Refusing Hemodialysis

  • 摘要: 对于慢性肾衰竭患者的治疗,肾内科医生需摆脱“千篇一律”的透析方案,考虑患者生命质量、特定情境因素,尊重患者偏好,并意识到患者参与在确定治疗目标和治疗决策中的重要性。本文以“慢性肾衰竭患者拒绝血液透析”为例,基于临床伦理学“四主题理论”模式,结合医学伦理学原则,剖析慢性肾衰竭患者肾脏替代治疗中面临的临床伦理学问题。医生在提供诊疗建议时既应结合患者偏好,又需保持最佳诊疗质量,最终实现以患者为中心、医患共同决策的诊疗模式。

     

    Abstract: For the treatment of chronic renal failure, nephrologists should avoid the "one-size-fits-all" dialysis program, consider the patients' quality of life, contextual features, respect patients' preference, and recognize the importance of patients' participation in determining the goal and clinical decision. Based on the "Four Topics Theory" of clinical ethics and the medical ethical principles through an example of a patient that refused hemodialysis for chronic renal failure, this article explores the ethical issues related to the choice of treatment for patients with chronic renal failure. The clinical decision should combine the patient's preference and the best quality of medical care, which ultimately achieves a medical model of patient-centered and shared decisionmaking.

     

/

返回文章
返回