Email Alert RSS
Volume 11 Issue 1
Jan.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
Ge LIU, Tao CHEN, Yang MU, Bao-shi HAN, Hang ZHU, Qi WANG, Yu-tao GUO, Yun-dai CHEN, Jun GUO. Value of Three Imaging Modalities for the Size Selection of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(1): 21-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20190196
Citation: Ge LIU, Tao CHEN, Yang MU, Bao-shi HAN, Hang ZHU, Qi WANG, Yu-tao GUO, Yun-dai CHEN, Jun GUO. Value of Three Imaging Modalities for the Size Selection of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(1): 21-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20190196
shu

Value of Three Imaging Modalities for the Size Selection of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device

  • Department of Cardiology, The First Medical Center of People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    GUO Jun Tel: 86-10-55499311, E-mail:guojun301@hotmail.com

  • Received Date: September 15, 2019
  • Issue Publish Date: January 29, 2020
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  The aim of this study was to primarily explore the value of CT angiography (CTA), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and intraoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in measuring the orifice diameter of the left atrial appendage for selecting the appropriate size of a closure device.
      Methods  Clinical data of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage closure from December 1, 2015 to March 31, 2019 in The First Medical Center of People'sLiberation Army General Hospital were retrospectively collected. The orifice diameters of left atrial appendage were measured by CTA, TEE, and DSA simultaneously; the size of the device was recorded. The relationship between the measurement result of either method and the device size was analyzed using Pearson's correlation, and the Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the concordance between the measurement of each method and the device size.
      Results  Totally 102 patients meeting the inclusive and exclusive criteria were enrolled in this study. All patients received successful implantation of left atrial appendage device, with the mean age of (70.1±9.8)years, the CHA2DS2-VASc score (estimatiing the stroke risk for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in adults) of 5.11±1.43, and the HAS-BLED score (assessing the bleeding risk) of 3.61±1.18. There was no significant difference in the diameter measurement of the left atrial appendage orifice between CTA and DSA[(22.51±3.55)mm vs. (22.22±3.73)mm, q=0.81, P=0.12]; while both measurements were greater than that of TEE[(20.82±3.63)mm, both P < 0.01]. There were good correlations between the CTA, DSA, TEE, and device size (r=0.93, 0.87, 0.83, respectively, all P < 0.01). In the Bland-Altman plots, the narrowest limits of agreement were shown in the correlation of the device size and CTA measurements (-7.83 mm, -2.56 mm), the difference was (-5.19±1.35)mm, and the 95% confidence interval was (-5.46 mm, -4.93 mm); while the widest was in the correlation of the device size and TEE measurements (-11.00 mm, -2.77 mm), the difference was (-6.88±2.10)mm, and the 95% confidence interval was (-7.29 mm, -6.47 mm).
      Conclusion  s For the selection of WATCHMAN closure device, CTA, DSA, and TEE might provide valuable reference measurements. Among the three imaging modalities, the relevance and concordance of CTA measurements are the best.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (18)
  • [1]
    Sievert H, Lesh MD, Trepels T, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation:early clinical experience[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105:1887-1889. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000015698.54752.6D
    [2]
    Cresti A, García-Fernández MA, Sievert H, et al. Prevalence of extra-appendage thrombosis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in patients undergoing cardioversion:a large transoesophageal echo study[J]. EuroIntervention, 2019, 15:e225-e230. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00128
    [3]
    Go AS, Hylek EM, Borowsky LH, et al. Warfarin use among ambulatory patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation:the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) study[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1999, 131:927-934. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10610643
    [4]
    Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation:a randomised non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet, 2009, 374:534-542. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X
    [5]
    Wunderlich NC, Beigel R, Swaans MJ, et al. Percutaneous interventions for left atrial appendage exclusion:options, assessment, and imaging using 2D and 3D echocardiography[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 8:472-488. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.002
    [6]
    Chow DH, Bieliauskas G, Sawaya FJ, et al. A comparative study of different imaging modalities for successful percutaneous left atrial appendage closure[J]. Open Heart, 2017, 4:e000627. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000627
    [7]
    Wang Y, Di BL, Horton RP, et al. Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2010, 21:973-982. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01814.x
    [8]
    Rajwani A, Nelson AJ, Shirazi MG, et al. CT sizing for left atrial appendage closure is associated with favourable outcomes for procedural safety[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, 18:1361-1368. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew212
    [9]
    Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation:2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial[J]. Circulation, 2013, 127:720-729. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389
    [10]
    Boersma LV, Ince H, Kische S, et al. Evaluating real-world clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients receiving the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure technology[J]. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2019, 12:e006841. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30939908/
    [11]
    毕文静, 孙菲菲, 任卫东, 等.应用实时三维经食管超声心动图评价非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心耳形态和功能[J].中国医学影像技术, 2013, 29:1616-1620. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=47458607
    [12]
    Saw J, Fahmy P, Spencer R, et al. Comparing measure-ments of CT angiography, TEE, and fluoroscopy of the left atrial appendage for percutaneous closure[J]. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2016, 27:414-422. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12909
    [13]
    Goitein O, Fink N, Guetta V, et al. Printed MDCT 3D models for prediction of left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder device size:a feasibility study[J]. EuroIntervention, 2017, 13:e1076-e1079. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00921
    [14]
    孟庆国, 尹立雪, 曾杰, 等.三维经食管超声心动图与其他影像技术指导左心耳封堵术的对比[J].中国医学影像技术, 2017, 33:365-369. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXX201703017.htm
    [15]
    余正春, 马小静, 夏娟, 等.经食管超声心动图及CT在左心耳封堵术前检查中的应用价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志, 2017, 28:105-108. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-LYYX201702009.htm
    [16]
    Lewalter T, Ibrahim R, Albers B, et al. An update and current expert opinions on percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation[J]. Europace, 2013, 15:652-656. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut043
    [17]
    Chue CD, de Giovanni J, Steeds RP. The role of echocardiography in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion[J]. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2011, 12:i3-i10. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer090
    [18]
    Lindner S, Behnes M, Wenke A, et al. Relation of left atrial appendage closure devices to topographic neighboring structures using standardized imaging by cardiac computed tomography angiography[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2019, 42:264-269. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712306/
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]YAN Xinchun, HUO Li. Evaluation of Von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome Through Novel Small Molecular Tracer 68Ga-NY104 PET/CT Imaging[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(4): 911-915. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0216
    [2]ZHAO Jing, LIN Yiting, LI Yunkui, ZHANG Xiaotong, ZHAO Yuanyuan, CHEN Yong, CHEN Keqi, WANG Mengzhao. A Case Report of Thoracic Enhanced Chest CT Combined with Endobronchial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Bronchial Dieulafoy's Disease[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(3): 629-632. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0423
    [3]National Center for Cardiovascular Quality Improvement,China, Working Group on Cardiovascular Imaging Quality Control, Zheng-yu JIN. Expert Consensus on the Scan and Report of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(1): 23-30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.01.005
    [5]Shuai TANG, Jie YI, Yu-guang HUANG. Cardiovascular Responses of Intubation with Shikani Seeing Optical Stylet and Macintosh Laryngoscope[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2012, 3(3): 314-317. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2012.03.015
    [6]Hui WANG, Chao NI, Li-lin GUO, Wen-ling ZHU. Comparison of Diagnostic Value of Tansthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Infective Endocarditis[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2012, 3(3): 310-313. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2012.03.014
    [7]Shuo LI, Yi-ning WANG, Ling-yan KONG, Zhi-wei WANG, Kang ZHOU, Hong-ling FAN, Ming WANG, Zheng-yu JIN. Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Electrocardiogram-triggered Coronary CT Angiography Using Dual-source CT[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2012, 3(2): 208-212. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2012.02.017
    [8]Guang-jun CHEN, Tie-hu YE, Yu-guang HUANG, Ai-lun LUO, Shan-qing LI. Evaluation of Hemodynamic Status by Transesophageal Echo-cardiography during One-lung Ventilation with Low Tidal Volume and Positive End-expiratory Pressure in Left Lateral Position[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2011, 2(4): 313-318. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2011.04.007
    [9]Yu CHEN, Hua-dan XUE, Xiao-bo ZHANG, Wei LIU, Hao SUN, Xuan WANG, Bai-yan SU, Yong-lan HE, Ke-fei WANG, Zheng-yu JIN. Head and Neck Dual Energy Bone Removal Computed Tomography Angiography Using the Intracranial Aneurysms[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2011, 2(3): 246-251. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2011.03.012
    [10]Xuan WANG, Hua-dan XUE, Zheng-yu JIN. Non-contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Selective Visualization of Hepatic Vasculature with True Steady-state Free-precession Sequence Combined with Time-spatial Labeling Inversion Pulses[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2011, 2(3): 237-241. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2011.03.010

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 王佳，赵霞，周海滨，徐涛，王庚. 顺苯磺酸阿曲库铵不抑制患者接受术中血液回收后肌肉及呼吸功能的恢复:单中心前瞻性研究. 协和医学杂志. 2019(02): 138-142 . 本站查看
    2. 刘琳，张建敏，赵欣，任艺，福文雅，冯磊. 术中回收式自体输血对接受脊柱矫形手术的学龄前儿童凝血功能的影响研究. 临床小儿外科杂志. 2019(07): 579-582 .
    3. 林志刚，申才良. 自体输血与同种输血对骨科患者术后恢复的影响. 基因组学与应用生物学. 2018(12): 5509-5515 .
    4. 游江成，柯惠平，赵志伟. 回收式自身输血在中等量出血手术中的应用价值. 中国医药科学. 2018(21): 216-218 .
    5. 蔡晶晶，吕红，郝唯，霍良红，郑超，张建敏. 不同年龄儿童脊柱侧弯手术中血液保护的研究. 北京医学. 2017(07): 684-687 .
    6. 王昊. 术野回收式自体输血技术在麻醉手术期间血液保护中的应用. 智慧健康. 2017(13): 39-40 .
    7. 于帅，黄用文，付振书，林梦霞，吴月清，冯倩，闻巍，于洋. 预存式自体输血在腰椎后路手术中的应用. 中国输血杂志. 2016(01): 71-73 .
    8. 周俊，张艳春. 自体输血的应用探索与创新. 中国输血杂志. 2016(03): 231-234 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (577) PDF downloads (147) Cited by(11)
    Related
    Links: National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences(CAMS) AMLC Check CNKI Database CNKI Term Online Chinese General Practice
    Address：Room 302,Third Floor,Building 7, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China
    Tel：010-69154261/4262
    E - mail：medj@pumch.cn mjpumch@126.com
    Copyright of website：Editorial Office of Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close