Guang-yan XU, Li XU, Zi-jia LIU, Yu-guang HUANG. Predictive Value of Preoperative Assessment Tools for Perioperative Major Adverse Cardiac Event in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(5): 518-523. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.05.016
Citation: Guang-yan XU, Li XU, Zi-jia LIU, Yu-guang HUANG. Predictive Value of Preoperative Assessment Tools for Perioperative Major Adverse Cardiac Event in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(5): 518-523. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.05.016

Predictive Value of Preoperative Assessment Tools for Perioperative Major Adverse Cardiac Event in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    HUANG Yu-guang Tel: 86-10-69152100, E-mail:garybeijing@163.com

  • Received Date: March 24, 2019
  • Issue Publish Date: September 29, 2019
  • The major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery is associated with a marked increase in morbidity and mortality. It is critical to use appropriate assessment tools preoperatively to assess the risk of major adverse cardiac event in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. We already have guidelines and expert consensus to guide the risk stratification for perioperative major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Revised Cardiac Risk Index, the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction or Cardiac Arrest Risk Calculator, and the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator are currently common assessment tools used for perioperative major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Currently, we have no relevant research on analyzing the applicable conditions, evaluating the merits and demerits of those assessment tools, and comparing the predictive values on perioperative major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. In this article, we review some domestic and foreign literature in recent years, attempting to summarize the performance of these assessment toolsin patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. We also aim to provide a guide for doctors to find the most optimal preoperative assessment tool.
  • [1]
    Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G, et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012:an assessment supporting improved health outcomes[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385:S11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Estimate+of+the+global+volume+of+surgery+in+2012%3A+an+assessment+supporting+improved+health+outcomes
    [2]
    Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery:a modelling strategy based on available data[J]. Lancet, 2008, 372:139-144. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18582931/
    [3]
    Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI. Cardiac Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 373:2258-2269. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26630144
    [4]
    Roshanov PS, Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, et al. External validation of the revised cardiac risk index and update of its renal variable to predict 30-day risk of major cardiac complications after non-cardiac surgery:rationale and plan for analyzes of the VISION study[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7:e013510. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28069624/
    [5]
    Botto F, Alonso-Coello P, Chan MT, et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery:a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014, 120:564-578. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24534856/
    [6]
    Pannell LM, Reyes EM, Underwood SR. Cardiac risk assessment before non-cardiac surgery[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 14:316-322.
    [7]
    Udeh BL, Dalton JE, Hata JS, et al. Economic trends from 2003 to 2010 for perioperative myocardial infarction:a retrospective, cohort study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014, 121:36-45. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=WK_LWW201705250134546
    [8]
    Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J]. Circulation, 2014, 130:2215-2245. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=25085961
    [9]
    Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery:cardiovascular assess-ment and management:The Joint Task Force on noncardiac surgery:cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35:2383-2431. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0642-9
    [10]
    Duceppe E, Parlow J, Macdonald P, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Management for Patients Who Undergo Noncardiac Surgery[J]. Can J Cardiol, 2017, 33:17-32. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=b0e48b5b5517f4cec0c3211b3e33c908
    [11]
    中华医学会麻醉学分会编.中国麻醉学指南与专家共识[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2017:75-87.
    [12]
    Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery[J]. Circulation, 1999, 100:1043-1049. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=WK_LWW201705250306778
    [13]
    Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial):a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2008, 371:1839-1847. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673608606017
    [14]
    Hoftman N, Prunean A, Dhillon A, et al. Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) is a useful tool for evaluation of perioperative cardiac morbidity in kidney transplant recipients[J]. Transplantation, 2013, 96:639-643. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249966032_Revised_Cardiac_Risk_Index_RCRI_Is_a_Useful_Tool_for_Evaluation_of_Perioperative_Cardiac_Morbidity_in_Kidney_Transplant_Recipients
    [15]
    Ford MK, Beattie WS, Wijeysundera DN. Systematic review:prediction of perioperative cardiac complications and mortality by the revised cardiac risk index[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2010, 152:26-35. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/CRDWeb/ShowRecord.asp?ID=12010000307&ID=12010000307
    [16]
    Wotton R, Marshall A, Kerr A, et al. Does the revised cardiac risk index predict cardiac complications following elective lung resection?[J]. Cardiothora Surg, 2013, 8:220-220. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-220
    [17]
    Smeili LAA, Lotufo PA. Incidence and Predictors of Cardiovascular Complications and Death after Vascular Surgery[J]. Arq Bras De Cardiol, 2015, 105:510-518. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=Doaj000004130683
    [18]
    Payne CJ, Bryce GJ, Gibson SC, et al. The Revised Cardiac Risk Index performs poorly in patients undergoing major vascular surgery:a prospective observational study[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2013, 30:713-715.
    [19]
    Devereaux PJ, Chan MTV, Walsh M, et al. An international prospective cohort study evaluating major vascular complications among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery:the VISION Pilot Study[J]. Open Med, 2011, 5:e193-e200.
    [20]
    Che L, Xu L, Huang Y, et al. Clinical utility of the revised cardiac risk index in older Chinese patients with known coronary artery disease[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2017, 13:35-41. https://www.dovepress.com/clinical-utility-of-the-revised-cardiac-risk-index-in-older-chinese-pa-peer-reviewed-article-CIA
    [21]
    Biccard B. Proposed research plan for the derivation of a new Cardiac Risk Index[J]. Anesth Analg, 2015, 120:543-553.
    [22]
    Davis C, Tait G, Carroll J, et al. The Revised Cardiac Risk Index in the new millennium:a single-centre prospective cohort re-evaluation of the original variables in 9, 519 consecutive elective surgical patients[J]. Can J Anesth, 2013, 60:855-863. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-013-9988-5
    [23]
    Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery[J]. Circulation, 2011, 124:381-387. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015701
    [24]
    Peterson B, Ghahramani M, Harris S, et al. Usefulness of the Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest Calculator as a Discriminator of Adverse Cardiac Events After Elective Hip and Knee Surgery[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2016, 117:1992-1995. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.050
    [25]
    Cohn SL, Ros NF. Comparison of 4 Cardiac Risk Calculators in Predicting Postoperative Cardiac Complications after Noncardiac Operations[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2018, 121:125-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.031
    [26]
    Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator:a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons[J]. Am Coll Surg, 2013, 217:833-842. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385
    [27]
    Cohen ME, Liu Y, Ko CY, et al. An Examination of American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator Accuracy[J]. Am Coll of Surg, 2017, 224:787-795. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.057
    [28]
    Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Rosenthal RA, et al. Cardiac arrest among surgical patients:an analysis of incidence, patient characteristics, and outcomes in ACS-NSQIP[J]. JAMA Surg, 2013, 148:14-21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23324834/
    [29]
    Buschmann CT, Tsokos M. Frequent and rare complications of resuscitation attempts[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2009, 35:397-404. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1255-9
    [30]
    Prasad KG, Nelson BG, Deig CR, et al. ACS NSQIP risk calculator:an accurate predictor of complications in major head and neck surgery?[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 155:740-742. DOI: 10.1177/0194599816655976
    [31]
    Schneider AL, Deig CR, Prasad KG, et al. Ability of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator to predict complications following total laryngectomy[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2016, 142:972-979. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1809
    [32]
    Arce K, Moore EJ, Lohse CM, et al. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator does not accurately predict risk of 30-day complications among patients undergoing microva-scular head and neck reconstruction[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74:1850-1858. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.024
    [33]
    Teoh D, Halloway RN, Heim J, et al. Evaluation of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery[J]. Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24:48-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.005
    [34]
    Rivard C, Nahum R, Slagle E, et al. Evaluation of the performance of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2016, 141:281-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.015
    [35]
    Szender JB, Frederick PJ, Eng KH, et al. Evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Universal Surgical Risk Calculator for a gynecologic oncology service[J]. Int Gynecol Cancer, 2015, 25:512-520. DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000378
    [36]
    O'Neill AC, Bagher S, Barandun M, et al. Can the American College of Surgeons NSQIP surgical risk calculator identify patients at risk of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction?[J]. Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2016, 69:1356-1362. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.05.021
    [37]
    Liu Y, Cohen ME, Hall BL, et al. Evaluation and enhancement of calibration in the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator[J]. Am Coll Surg, 2016, 223:231-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.040
    [38]
    Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm[J]. N Engl Med, 2010, 362:1863-1871. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909305
    [39]
    Rodseth RN, Lurati Buse GA, Bolliger D, et al. The predictive ability of pre-operative B-type natriuretic peptide in vascular patients for major adverse cardiac events:an individual patient data meta-analysis[J]. Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 58:522-529. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.018
    [40]
    Devereaux PJ, Chan MT, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Associa-tion between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery[J]. JAMA, 2012, 307:2295-2304. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.5502
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Ning, RUAN Gechong, JIAO Yang, LIU Xiaoqing, Jonathan Lio, KANG Lin. Research Hotspots and Trends of Growth Mindset in Medical Education: A Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0796
    [2]ZHOU Yuankai, LIU Pei, LIU Shengjun, YANG Yingying, YUAN Siyi, HE Huaiwu, LONG Yun. The Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Critical Care Medicine for Standardized Resident Physician Training[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0739
    [3]ZHANG Zhiyang, ZHAO Lin, SHAO Yajuan, WANG Xiang, LI Ningning, NING Xiaohong, GE Yuping. Investigation on Clinical Oncology Teaching Among Medical Students[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2024, 15(1): 223-228. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0103
    [4]LI Wei, XU Lingling, HU Yingli, ZHU Huijuan, LI Yuxiu, XIA Weibo. Integrating Education of School History into Teaching of Clinical Courses and Developing Professional Courses with PUMC Characteristics: Taking Diabetes Teaching in Internal Medicine as an Example[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(5): 1111-1115. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0148
    [5]WU Miao. Combining Education, Clinical Practice and Scientific Research: the Early Development of the Obstetrics and Gynecology of Peking Union Medical College(1919—1942)[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(2): 442-448. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0364
    [6]China Consortium of Elite Teaching Hospitals for Residency Education. Consensus on Core Competency Framework for Residency Education Among China Consortium of Elite Teaching Hospitals for Residency Education[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(1): 17-23. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0755
    [7]LI Huiyan, XIAO Lihua, KUANG Ming. Exploration and Practice of the Mode of Training Top-notch and Innovative Medical Talents in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(1): 13-16. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0724
    [8]FANG Xiangming, HAN Wei, XU Shiqi, RUAN Hengchao, CHEN Lei, DU Yue, XU Lingxiao, YU Fang, XIA Biaoquan. Iterative Innovation Empowers the Training of High-level Interdisciplinary Medical Talents in the New Era: Experiences from School of Medicine, Zhejiang University[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(1): 9-12. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0718
    [9]ZHANG Shuyang. Exploration and Practice of the Training System of Comprehensive Medical Talents at Peking Union Medical College Hospital[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(1): 5-8. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0535
    [10]LI Ji, YOU Wen, LIU Shuang, RUAN Ge-chong, XU Tian-ming, ZHANG Run-feng, ZHANG Xin-qing, QIAN Jia-ming. Clarify and Resolve Ethical Issues in the Teaching of Clinical Practice Based on the Four-topics Theory——An Example of Patients' Refusal to the Practice of Medical Students[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(2): 282-286. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.20200135

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (374) PDF downloads (175) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close