Lin LIN, Kai GUO, Meng YANG, Guan-nan WANG. Diagnostic Value of Resistive Index of the Renal Interlobar Artery in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(5): 499-504. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.05.013
Citation: Lin LIN, Kai GUO, Meng YANG, Guan-nan WANG. Diagnostic Value of Resistive Index of the Renal Interlobar Artery in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(5): 499-504. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.05.013

Diagnostic Value of Resistive Index of the Renal Interlobar Artery in Type 1 Cardiorenal Syndrome

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.05.013
More Information
  • Corresponding author: YANG Meng Tel: 86-10-69159311, E-mail:amengameng@hotmail.com
  • Received Date: 2018-06-14
  • Publish Date: 2019-09-30
  •   Objective  This study aimed to discuss the diagnostic value of the resistance index (RI) of the renal interlobar artery measured by color Doppler ultrasound in patients with type 1 cardiorenal syndrome(CRS).  Methods  Twenty patients with type 1 CRS diagnosed in emergency wards were defined as group CRS; 20 patients diagnosed as heart failure in the same period were defined as the control group. Clinical features, laboratory examination and medication of the two groups were analyzed. The RI of the two groups of patients was measured. The diagnostic value of RI in type 1 CRS was evaluated according to the receiver operat-ing characteristic(ROC) curve.  Results  There was no significant difference in age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), heart rate, pulse arterial pressure, and cardiac function classification between the two groups(all P>0.05). The level of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, creatitine, and RI of CRS group were higher than those in the control group; the glomerular filtration rate in group CRS was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve was 0.78 and the best cut-off point was 0.70. The sensitivity was 80% and the specificity was 80%.  Conclusions  As a new means, the RI of the renal interlobar artery can complement traditional methods and has a potential value in the diagnosis of type 1 CRS.
  • loading
  • [1] Ronco C, Bellomo R, McCullough PA, et al.Cardiorenal syndromes:report from the consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative[J].Eur Heart J, 2010, 31:703-711. doi:  10.1093/eurheartj/ehp507
    [2] 杨叶猗, 肖力, 刘伏, 等.心肾综合征临床诊断与监测的生物标记物[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2013, 7:2300-2303. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zhlcyszz201306003
    [3] Virzi GM, Breglia A, Brocca A, et al.Levels of Proinflammatory Cytokines, Oxidative Stress, and Tissue Damage Markers in Patients with Acute Heart Failure with and without Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1[J].Cardiorenal Med, 2018, 11, 8:321-331. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=d9404d1bc4e6053aeb7eccd47f55aa39
    [4] 贺秀红, 车岩, 杨敬英, 等.彩色多普勒超声对心肾综合征肾内动脉血流的评价[J].兰州大学学报(医学版), 2008, 34:68-70. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lanzyxyxb200802020
    [5] Elodie G.The Origins of the Prospective Cohort Study:American Cardiovascular Epidemiology and the Framingham Heart Study[J].Rev Hist Sci, 2011, 2:297-318. http://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_RHS_642_0297--the-origins-of-the-prospective-cohort.htm
    [6] Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes(KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group.KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury[J].Kidney Int, 2012, 2:1-38. doi:  10.1038/kisup.2012.1
    [7] Cirillo M.Rationale, pros and cons of GFR estimation:the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD equations[J].G Ital Nefrol, 2009, 26:310-317. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19554528
    [8] BongartzL G, Cramer MJ, Doevendans PA, et al.The severe cardiorenal syndrome:'Guyton revisited'[J].Eur Heart J, 2005, 26:11-17 doi:  10.1093/eurheartj/ehi020
    [9] Di Lullo L, House A, Gorini A, et al.Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular complications[J]. Heart Fail Rev, 2015, 20:259-272. doi:  10.1007/s10741-014-9460-9
    [10] Ronco C, Lullo LD. Cardiorenal Syndrome in Western Countries:Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Management Approaches[J].Kidney Dis, 2016, 2:151-163. doi:  10.1159/000448749
    [11] Atici A, Emet S, Cakmak R, et al. Type Ⅰ cardiorenal syndrome in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure:the importance of new renal biomarkers[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol, 2018, 22:3534-3543. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29917208
    [12] Wei L, Ye X, Pei X, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of serum cystatin C in chronic kidney disease:a meta-analysis[J].Clin Nephrol, 2015, 84:86-94 http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26200185
    [13] Verbrugge FH, Damman K, Tang WHW. Diuretics in cardiorenal syndrome:what's new?[J].Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44:359-362. doi:  10.1007/s00134-017-4834-9
    [14] 罗竞超, 邱晓华, 邱海波.肾动脉阻力指数在重症患者急性肾损伤评估中的应用[J].中华内科杂志, 2014, 53:496-498. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zhnk201406023
    [15] 许书添, 李世军.肾静脉高压与急性肾损伤[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志, 2015, 6:557-561. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=szbytxsyzzz201506014
    [16] 陈秀凯, 杨荣利.感染性急性肾损伤:几个热点问题的冷思考[J].协和医学杂志, 2017, 8:336-341. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XHYX201706005.htm
    [17] 李偲, 杜小刚.心肾综合征研究进展[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2015, 9:833-837.
    [18] Lacoviello M, Monitillo F, Leone M, et al.The Renal Arterial Resistance Index Predicts Worsening Renal Function in chronic Heart Failure Patients[J].Cardiorenal Med, 2016, 6:116-128. doi:  10.1159/000442300
    [19] 张晓东, 李建初.肾动脉阻力指数新认识[J].中国继续医学教育, 2017, 9:86-88. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgjxyxjy201722043
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (410) PDF downloads(53) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return