FAN Jun-ping, XIAO Meng, WANG Jing-lan, CHEN Yu, ZHANG Dong, XIA Peng, KE Fan-hang, ZHAO Jing, YANG Yan-li, SUN Xue-feng, ZHAO Ying, XU Ying-chun. Value of Biofire Filmarray Pneumonia Panel in Evaluating Secondary Infection in Critically Ill Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(1): 38-43. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.20200264
Citation: FAN Jun-ping, XIAO Meng, WANG Jing-lan, CHEN Yu, ZHANG Dong, XIA Peng, KE Fan-hang, ZHAO Jing, YANG Yan-li, SUN Xue-feng, ZHAO Ying, XU Ying-chun. Value of Biofire Filmarray Pneumonia Panel in Evaluating Secondary Infection in Critically Ill Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2021, 12(1): 38-43. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.20200264

Value of Biofire Filmarray Pneumonia Panel in Evaluating Secondary Infection in Critically Ill Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019

  •   Objective  To explore the application value of Biofire Filmarry pneumonia panel (PN) in detection of secondary and concomitant pathogen among critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19).
      Methods  We consecutively included and analyzed the clinical data of critically ill patients with COVID-19 transferred to the ICU from February to April 2020 in the Sino-French Campus of Wuhan Tongji Hospital. Samples of Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid obtained by bedside bronchoscopy were sent for Biofire Filmarray PN and standard culture concomitantly. We compared the results of two methods and evaluated their concordance.
      Results  In total, 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 were included and 54 samples were tested, including 33 (61.1%) Biofire Filmarray PN tests (21 patients) and 21 (38.9%) standard cultures (14 patients), in which 19 pairs (38 samples) underwent both tests simultaneously. In Biofire Filmarray PN group, the turnaround time was about 1 hour. There were 74 positive results in 32 samples (97.0%) from 20 patients, including 29 cases(39.2%) of Acinetobacter baumannii complex, 21 cases (28.4%) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 16 cases (21.6%)of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 5 cases (6.8%) of Escherichia coli, 1 case (1.4%)each of Enterobacter cloacae, Haemophilus influenzae, and respiratory syncytial virus. In the standard culture group, the turnaround time was about 3 days. 19 positive results returned in 16 (76.2%) samples from 11 patients, including 8 cases (42.1%) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 6 cases (31.6%) of Acinetobacter baumannii, 4 cases (21.1%) of Stenotrophomonas malt and 1 case (5.3%) of Myxobacterium. Among the 19 pairs of "back-to-back" specimens, 15 pairs were concordant, and the agreement ratio was 78.9%.
      Conclusions  Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa may be the common pathogens of secondary or concomitant infection in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Biofire Filmarray PN is a rapid diagnostic test and has application value in such patients; its sensitivity and accuracy require further investigation with larger sample sizes.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return