张明子, 斯楼斌, 黄久佐, 俞楠泽, 郑姣洁, 陈洁, 王晓军, 龙笑, 熊伟. 中国整形美容专业医疗质量控制指标体系构建[J]. 协和医学杂志. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0052
引用本文: 张明子, 斯楼斌, 黄久佐, 俞楠泽, 郑姣洁, 陈洁, 王晓军, 龙笑, 熊伟. 中国整形美容专业医疗质量控制指标体系构建[J]. 协和医学杂志. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0052
ZHANG Mingzi, SI Loubin, HUANG Jiuzuo, YU Nanze, ZHENG Jiaojie, CHEN Jie, WANG Xiaojun, LONG Xiao, XIONG Wei. The Construction of Medical Quality Control Indicators System for Chinese Plastic and Aesthetic Major[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0052
Citation: ZHANG Mingzi, SI Loubin, HUANG Jiuzuo, YU Nanze, ZHENG Jiaojie, CHEN Jie, WANG Xiaojun, LONG Xiao, XIONG Wei. The Construction of Medical Quality Control Indicators System for Chinese Plastic and Aesthetic Major[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2024-0052

中国整形美容专业医疗质量控制指标体系构建

The Construction of Medical Quality Control Indicators System for Chinese Plastic and Aesthetic Major

  • 摘要: 目的 建立我国整形美容专业医疗质量控制指标体系,为中国整形美容专业医疗质量控制工作奠定基础。 方法 整形美容专业国家级质控中心成立工作小组,以"结构-过程-结果"质控理论为指导,借鉴其他专业相关指标,通过查阅文献、会议讨论,以及整合质控专家意见,拟定整形美容专业医疗质量控制指标,并通过德尔菲专家函询的方式最终确立整形美容专业医疗质量控制指标体系。 结果 共实施两轮专家函询,问卷回收率均为100%,专家权威系数分别为0.854和0.857,第二轮函询一级指标的专家协调系数为0.387、二级指标的专家协调系数为0.425(P<0.01),最终确立包含3项一级指标和9项二级指标的整形美容专业医疗质量控制指标体系。 结论 本研究构建的中国整形美容专业医疗质量控制指标体系具有一定的科学性和合理性,为我国整形美容专业医疗质量控制工作提供了借鉴和参考,指标体系需在实践应用中进一步改进和完善。

     

    Abstract: Objective To construct a quality control indicators system for Chinese Plastic and Aesthetic Major and offer basics for medical quality control works. Methods National quality control center of Plastic and Aesthetic major established a working group. The working group guided by the "structure-process-outcome" theory, learned from other majors' relevant indicators, reviewed literatures, discussed in meetings, combined with opinions from quality control experts, and formulated medical quality control indicators for Plastic and Aesthetic major. The quality control indicators system was finally established by Delphi expert consultation. Results Delphi survey was 100% of 2 rounds. The authorities of 2 rounds of expert consultation were 0.854 and 0.857. The harmonious coefficients were 0.387 of primary indicators and 0.425 of secondary indicators (P<0.01). The finalized indicators system includes 3 primary indicators and 9 secondary indicators. Conclusion The quality control indicators system established in this study for Plastic and Aesthetic major in China has a certain degree of scientificity and rationality, which offered references for medical quality control works of Plastic and Aesthetic major in China. However, this system should be improved and ameliorated in practical application.

     

/

返回文章
返回