邮件订阅 RSS

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

证据合成方法学：现状与发展

苏仁凤,  玉炫,  史乾灵,  罗旭飞,  孙雅佳,  兰慧,  任梦娟,  吴守媛,  王平,  王玲,  赵俊贤,  陈耀龙

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 协和医学杂志  > 优先出版
苏仁凤, 玉炫, 史乾灵, 罗旭飞, 孙雅佳, 兰慧, 任梦娟, 吴守媛, 王平, 王玲, 赵俊贤, 陈耀龙. 证据合成方法学：现状与发展[J]. 协和医学杂志. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0062
引用本文: 苏仁凤, 玉炫, 史乾灵, 罗旭飞, 孙雅佳, 兰慧, 任梦娟, 吴守媛, 王平, 王玲, 赵俊贤, 陈耀龙. 证据合成方法学：现状与发展[J]. 协和医学杂志. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0062
shu
SU Renfeng, YU Xuan, SHI Qianling, LUO Xufei, SUN Yajia, LAN Hui, REN Mengjuan, WU Shouyuan, WANG Ping, WANG Ling, ZHAO Junxian, CHEN Yaolong. Current Situation and Progress of Evidence Synthesis Methodology[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0062
Citation: SU Renfeng, YU Xuan, SHI Qianling, LUO Xufei, SUN Yajia, LAN Hui, REN Mengjuan, WU Shouyuan, WANG Ping, WANG Ling, ZHAO Junxian, CHEN Yaolong. Current Situation and Progress of Evidence Synthesis Methodology[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0062
shu

证据合成方法学：现状与发展

doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0062

  • 1 兰州大学 公共卫生学院, 兰州 730000;

  • 2 兰州大学 基础医学院循证医学中心, 兰州 730000;

  • 3 兰州大学 第一临床医学院, 兰州 730000;

  • 4 中国医学科学院循证评价与指南研究创新单元 兰州大学基础医学院, 兰州 730000;

  • 5 世界卫生组织指南实施与知识转化合作中心, 兰州 730000

基金项目: 

国家社会科学基金重大项目“循证社会科学的理论体系、国际经验与路径研究”（ 19ZDA142）

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    陈耀龙,E-mail:chevidence@lzu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: R181.2;R-3;G304

Current Situation and Progress of Evidence Synthesis Methodology

  • 1 School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;

  • 2 Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;

  • 3 The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;

  • 4 Research Unit of Evidence-based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;

  • 5 WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou 730000, China

Funds: 

National Social Science Foundation of China “Research on the Theoretical System ， International Experience and Chinese Path of Evidence-based Social Science” (19ZDA142)

    摘要
  • 摘要: 证据合成即使用系统、明确的方法对现有研究进行合成。目前的证据合成方法种类众多，应用领域广泛，如何选择和使用最佳的证据合成方法是研究人员、政策制定者与其他利益相关者关注的问题。本文在归纳与总结证据合成方法发展现状和分类的基础上，阐述证据合成方法的定义、特点及应用中存在的问题，并就证据合成方法应用中面临的问题提出思考与建议。
    Abstract: Evidence synthesis is the synthesis of existing research using a systematic and appropriate method. There are various types of evidence synthesis used nowadays. However， correctly choosing and applying the best evidence synthesis method is crucial that researchers ， policymakers ， and stakeholders pay attention to. Thus ， based on summarizing the current situation ， progress ， and classification of evidence synthesis methods， we introduced the definition and characteristics of common evidence synthesis methods and problems in the application of evidence synthesis methods， and put forward thoughts and suggestions for the problems faced by the application of evidence synthesis methods.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(73)
  • [1] Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al.Lost in knowledge translation:time for a map?[J].J Contin Educ Health Prof, 2006, 26:13-24.
    [2] Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E.JBI's systematic reviews:data extraction and synthesis[J]. Am J Nurs, 2014, 114:49-54.
    [3] Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, et al.What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences[J].BMC Med Res Methodol, 2018, 18:1-9.
    [4] Clarke M. History of evidence synthesis to assess treatment effects:Personal reflections on something that is very much alive[J]. J R Soc Med, 2016, 109:154-163.
    [5] Lind J. A Treatise on the Scurvy[M].London:A Millar in the Strand, 1757.
    [6] Gough D, Davies P, Jamtvedt G, et al.Evidence Synthesis International(ESI):Position Statement[J].Syst Rev, 2020, 9:1-9.
    [7] Pearson K.Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics[J].BMJ, 1904, 3:1243-1246.
    [8] Cochrane AL.Effectiveness and Efficiency:Random Reflections on Health Services[M].London:Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972.
    [9] Glass GV.Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research[J].Edu Res, 1976, 5:3-8.
    [10] Smith ML, Glass GV.Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies[J]. Am Psychol, 1977, 32:752-760.
    [11] Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al.Improving the quality of reports of metaanalyses of randomised controlled trials:the QUOROM statement.Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses[J].Lancet, 1999, 354:1896-1900.
    [12] Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al.Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations[J].BMJ, 2004, 328:1490.
    [13] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA statement[J].Ann Intern Med, 2009, 151:264-269.
    [14] Institute of Medicine.Clinical practice guidelines we can trust[M].Washington DC:National Academies Press, 2011.
    [15] Xiao Y, Watson M.Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review[J]. J Plan Educ Res, 2019, 39:93-112.
    [16] Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Young B, et al.Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence[M].London:Health Development Agency, 2004.
    [17] Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, Noyes J, et al.Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions:how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66:1230-1243.
    [18] 杨克虎, 李秀霞, 拜争刚.循证社会科学研究方法:系统评价与Meta分析[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社, 2018.
    [19] 周旭毓, 方积乾.Meta分析的常见偏倚[J].循证医学, 2002:216-220.
    [20] 田金徽.证据生态系统中证据合成与转化研究方法进展与挑战[J].中国药物评价, 2022, 39:1-10.
    [21] Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, et al.Evidence summaries:the evolution of a rapid review approach[J].Syst Rev, 2012, 1:1-9.
    [22] Hamel C, Michaud A, Thuku M, et al.Defining Rapid Reviews:a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 2021, 129:74-85.
    [23] Grant MJ, Booth A.A typology of reviews:an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies[J].Health Info Libr J, 2009, 26:91-108.
    [24] Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al.Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach[J].BMC Med Res Methodol, 2018, 18:143.
    [25] Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Shanman R, et al.What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products[J].Syst Rev, 2016, 5:28.
    [26] Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions[M/OL]. (2022-08-04)[2023-02-08].https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.
    [27] Elliott JH, Turner T, Clavisi O, et al.Living systematic reviews:an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap[J].PLoS Med, 2014, 11:e1001603.
    [28] Simmonds M, Salanti G, McKenzie J, et al.Living systematic reviews:3. Statistical methods for updating meta-analyses[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 2017, 91:38-46.
    [29] Noblit GW, Hare RD, Hare RD.Meta-ethnography:Synthesizing qualitative studies[M].California:Sage Publications, 1988.
    [30] 张静怡, 张雅婷, 盖琼艳, 等.定性资料的系统评价方法学汇总[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2017, 9:523-527.
    [31] Thomas J, Harden A.Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews[J].BMC Med Res Methodol, 2008, 8:45.
    [32] 刘雪寒, 鲁春丽, 郑偌祥, 等.定性研究的综合方法概述及其在医学中的应用进展[J]. 世界中医药, 2021, 16:3093-3099.
    [33] Barnett-Page E, Thomas J.Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research:a critical review[J].BMC Med Res Methodol, 2009, 9:59.
    [34] Bowen GA.Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts[J].Int J Qual Meth, 2006, 5:12-23.
    [35] 于兆吉, 张嘉桐.扎根理论发展及应用研究评述[J].沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 10:58-63.
    [36] Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al.Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence:a review of possible methods[J].J Health Serv Res Policy, 2005, 10:45-53.
    [37] Schick-Makaroff K, MacDonald M, Plummer M, et al.What Synthesis Methodology Should I Use? A Review and Analysis of Approaches to Research Synthesis[J].AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3:172-215.
    [38] Bossuyt P, Davenport C, Deeks J, et al.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy[M].The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
    [39] Sandelowski M, Barroso J.Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research[M].New York:Springer Publishing Company, 2006.
    [40] Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors).JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis[M].JBI, 2020.
    [41] Cooper, Harris, Larry V, et al.The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis[M].New York:Russell Sage Foundation, 2019.
    [42] Paré G, Trudel MC, Jaana M, et al.Synthesizing information systems knowledge:A typology of literature reviews[J].Inf Manage, 2015, 52:183-199.
    [43] Cronin P, Ryan F, Coughlan M.Undertaking a literature review:a step-by-step approach[J].Br J Nurs, 2008, 17:38-43.
    [44] 国家标准化管理委员会,国家市场监督管理总局.确定术语的一般原则与方法:GB/T 10112-2019[P].2019-08-30.
    [45] 国家标准化管理委员会,国家市场监督管理总局.术语工作原则与方法:GB/T 10112-2019[P].2019-08-30.
    [46] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA statement[J]. PLoS Med, 2009, 6:e1000097.
    [47] Welch V, Petticrew M, Tugwell P, et al.PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension:Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity[J].PLoS Med, 2012, 9:e1001333.
    [48] Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, et al.PRISMA for Abstracts:Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts[J].PLoS Med, 2013, 10:e1001419.
    [49] Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al.The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions:Checklist and Explanations[J].Ann Intern Med, 2015, 162:777-784.
    [50] Stewart LA, Clarke M, Rovers M, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data:the PRISMA-IPD Statement[J].JAMA, 2015, 313:1657-1665.
    [51] Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols(PRISMA-P) 2015 statement[J].Syst Rev, 2015, 4:1.
    [52] Zorzela L, Loke YK, Ioannidis JP, et al.PRISMA harms checklist:improving harms reporting in systematic reviews[J].BMJ, 2016, 352:i157.
    [53] Guise JM, Butler ME, Chang C, et al.AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6:PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 2017, 90:43-50.
    [54] Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al.PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR):Checklist and Explanation[J].Ann Intern Med, 2018, 169:467-473.
    [55] McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies:The PRISMA-DTA Statement[J].JAMA, 2018, 319:388-396.
    [56] Wang X, Chen Y, Liu Y, et al.Reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses of acupuncture:the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist[J].BMC Complement Altern Med, 2019, 19:208.
    [57] Zhang X, Tan R, Lam WC, et al.PRISMA extension for moxibustion 2020:recommendations, explanation, and elaboration[J].Syst Rev, 2020, 9:247.
    [58] Zhang X, Tan R, Lam WC, et al.PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicines 2020(PRISMA-CHM 2020)[J].Am J Chin Med, 2020, 48:1279-1313.
    [59] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement:an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews[J].BMJ, 2021, 372:n71.
    [60] Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al.PRISMA-S Group. PRISMA-S:an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews[J]. Syst Rev, 2021, 10:39.
    [61] Cohen JF, Deeks JJ, Hooft L, et al.Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies(PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts):checklist, explanation, and elaboration[J].BMJ, 2021, 372:n265.
    [62] O'Dea RE, Lagisz M, Jennions MD, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology:a PRISMA extension[J].Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 2021, 96:1695-1722.
    [63] Zhao B, Hu K, Zeng X, et al.Development of a reporting guideline for systematic reviews of animal experiments in the field of traditional Chinese medicine[J].J Evid Based Med, 2022, 15:152-167.
    [64] Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, et al.RAMESES publication standards:metanarrative reviews[J].BMC Med, 2013, 11:20.
    [65] Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, et al.RAMESES publication standards:realist syntheses[J].BMC Med, 2013, 11:21.
    [66] Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, et al.Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research:ENTREQ[J].BMC Med Res Methodol, 2012, 12:181.
    [67] Bougioukas KI, Liakos A, Tsapas A, et al.Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist:a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 2018, 93:9-24.
    [68] France EF, Cunningham M, Ring N, et al.Improving reporting of MetaEthnography:The eMERGe Reporting Guidance[J].BMC Med Res Methodol, 2019, 19:25.
    [69] Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al.Synthesis without meta-analysis (SwiM) in systematic reviews:reporting guideline[J].BMJ, 2020, 368:l6890.
    [70] Gates M, Gates A, Pieper D, et al.Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions:development of the PRIOR statement[J].BMJ, 2022, 378:e070849.
    [71] Cook CN, Nichols SJ, Webb JA, et al. Simplifying the selection of evidence synthesis methods to inform environmental decisions:a guide for decision makers and scientists[J].Biol Conserv, 2017, 213:135-145.
    [72] Pullin A, Frampton G, Jongman R, et al.Selecting appropriate methods of knowledge synthesis to inform biodiversity policy[J].Biodivers Conserv, 2016, 25:1285-1300.
    [73] Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K, et al.Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches[J].J Clin Epidemiol, 2018, 99:41-52.
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  34
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  9
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-02-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    友情链接: 国家卫生健康委员会 北京协和医院 中国医学科学院 学术不端检测系统 国际知识资源总库 中国知网 术语在线 中国全科医学
    地址：北京市东城区帅府园1号 北京协和医院老楼7号楼
    3层302室 《协和医学杂志》编辑部
    电话：010-69154261/4262
    E - mail：medj@pumch.cn
    mjpumch@126.com
    期刊网站版权所有：《协和医学杂志》编辑部
    京ICP备 11002662

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计

    x 关闭 永久关闭

    【温馨提醒】近日，《协和医学杂志》编辑部接到作者反映，有多名不法人员冒充期刊编辑发送见刊通知，鼓动作者添加微信，从而骗取版面费的行为。特提醒您，本刊与作者联系的方式均为邮件通知或电话，稿件进度通知邮箱为：mjpumch@126.com，编辑部电话为：010-69154261，请提高警惕，谨防上当受骗！如有任何疑问，请致电编辑部核实。谢谢！