魏梦超, 王文达, 王诗钧, 张志军, 文进. 膀胱镜联合腹腔镜切除术治疗膀胱憩室的初步疗效[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2023, 14(4): 802-807. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0044
引用本文: 魏梦超, 王文达, 王诗钧, 张志军, 文进. 膀胱镜联合腹腔镜切除术治疗膀胱憩室的初步疗效[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2023, 14(4): 802-807. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0044
WEI Mengchao, WANG Wenda, WANG Shijun, ZHANG Zhijun, WEN Jin. Preliminary Efficacy of Combined Laparoscopy and Cystoscopy in the Treatment of Bladder Diverticula[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(4): 802-807. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0044
Citation: WEI Mengchao, WANG Wenda, WANG Shijun, ZHANG Zhijun, WEN Jin. Preliminary Efficacy of Combined Laparoscopy and Cystoscopy in the Treatment of Bladder Diverticula[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2023, 14(4): 802-807. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2023-0044

膀胱镜联合腹腔镜切除术治疗膀胱憩室的初步疗效

Preliminary Efficacy of Combined Laparoscopy and Cystoscopy in the Treatment of Bladder Diverticula

  • 摘要:
      目的  探索性分析膀胱镜联合腹腔镜切除术治疗膀胱憩室的疗效及其安全性。
      方法  回顾性收集2007年3月至2022年9月北京协和医院行手术治疗膀胱憩室患者的临床资料, 根据术式其分为单纯开放手术/腹腔镜组、膀胱镜联合腹腔镜组。比较两组手术相关指标及并发症发生率。
      结果  共入选符合纳入与排除标准的膀胱憩室患者11例, 包括单纯开放手术/腹腔镜组6例、膀胱镜联合腹腔镜组5例, 其憩室最大径分别为7.5(4.5, 11.5) cm、5.2(5.0, 7.9) cm, 憩室口直径分别为1.1(1.0, 1.6) cm、1.5(1.1, 1.8) cm。两组均顺利完成手术, 拔除尿管后均正常排尿; 随访6~60个月均无憩室复发。膀胱镜联合腹腔镜组与单纯开放手术/腹腔镜组的手术时间150.0(142.5, 180.0) min比160.0(108.8, 300.0) min、术中出血量50.0(35.0, 50.0) mL比50.0(45.0, 62.5) mL、引流管拔除时间5.0(3.5, 5.5) d比4.5(4.0, 6.8) d均相近; 相较于单纯开放手术/腹腔镜组, 膀胱镜联合腹腔镜组术后住院时间缩短6.0(6.0, 8.5) d比9.5(7.0, 16.0) d, 尿管拔除时间延长14.0(10.5, 14.0) d比11.5(6.5, 13.3) d。膀胱镜联合腹腔镜组无并发症发生, 单纯开放手术/腹腔镜组2例出现术后并发症, 包括下肢深静脉血栓形成1例、术后高热1例。
      结论  膀胱镜联合腹腔镜切除术治疗膀胱憩室可取得与单纯开放手术或腹腔镜手术相近的疗效, 且其安全性更高、患者术后恢复更快。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To exploratively analyze the efficacy and safety of combined laparoscopy and cystoscopy in the treatment of bladder diverticula.
      Methods  Clinical data of patients who received bladder diverticulectomy in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from March 2007 to September 2022 were retrospectively collected.The patients were divided into open/laparoscopy alone group and combined laparoscopy and cystoscopy group based on surgical approach.Surgery-related outcomes and complication rates were compared.
      Results  A total of 11 patients with bladder diverticula who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in thestudy, including 6 patients in the open/laparoscopy alone group and 5 patients in the combined laparoscopy and cystoscopy group.The median maximum diameter of diverticula in the open/laparoscopy alone group and combined laparoscopy and cystoscopy group were 7.5(4.5, 11.5) cm and 5.2(5.0, 7.9) cm, respectively, and the median diameter of diverticula neck were 1.1(1.0, 1.6) cm and 1.5(1.1, 1.8) cm, respectively.Operations were successfully performed in both two groups and the patients had normal urination after drawing the catheter.No recurrence of bladder diverticulum at 6 to 60 months of follow-up.The median operative time150.0(142.5, 180.0) min vs. 160.0(108.8, 300.0) min, blood loss50.0(35.0, 50.0) mL vs. 50.0(45.0, 62.5) mLand indwelling time of drainage tube5.0(3.5, 5.5) d vs. 4.5(4.0, 6.8) dwere similar between the two group.Compared to the open/laparoscopy alone group, the combined laparoscopy and cystoscopy group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay6.0(6.0, 8.5) d vs. 9.5(7.0, 16.0) dand longer indwelling time of urinary catheter14.0(10.5, 14.0) d vs. 11.5(6.5, 13.3) d.No complications occurred in the combined laparoscopy and cystoscopy group.In the open/laparoscopy alone group, 2 patients underwent postoperative complications, including 1 patient with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and 1 patient with hyperpyrexia.
      Conclusion  Preliminary results show that cystoscopy combined with laparoscopic resection for bladder diverticula can achieve similar outcomes as open surgery alone or laparoscopic surgery, and with greater safety and faster postoperative patient recovery.

     

/

返回文章
返回