留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

尊重患者自主性原则及其实践方式知情同意的临床伦理分析

谢静 李姝 朱玲 张抒扬

谢静, 李姝, 朱玲, 张抒扬. 尊重患者自主性原则及其实践方式知情同意的临床伦理分析[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(1): 147-151. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0007
引用本文: 谢静, 李姝, 朱玲, 张抒扬. 尊重患者自主性原则及其实践方式知情同意的临床伦理分析[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(1): 147-151. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0007
XIE Jing, LI Shu, ZHU Ling, ZHANG Shuyang. Autonomy of Patients and Informed Consent in Clinical Practice[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(1): 147-151. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0007
Citation: XIE Jing, LI Shu, ZHU Ling, ZHANG Shuyang. Autonomy of Patients and Informed Consent in Clinical Practice[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(1): 147-151. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0007

尊重患者自主性原则及其实践方式知情同意的临床伦理分析

doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0007
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    张抒扬, E-mail: shuyangzhang103@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R-052

Autonomy of Patients and Informed Consent in Clinical Practice

More Information
  • 摘要: 法律及伦理层面对医疗知情同意的要求日益严格,本文从伦理学角度剖析尊重患者自主性和医疗知情同意原则,以期为临床实践和临床伦理学相关研究和教学提供参考。首先分析尊重患者自主性的伦理学概念,在此基础上论述知情同意是落实尊重患者自主性原则的实践应用,梳理国内外关于医疗知情同意原则的确立历史和目前公认的知情同意实施过程,并由此得出如下结论:临床医疗知情同意存在共识尚待完善、培训不足、规范形成落后于新技术应用等挑战,未来应加强培训、开展相关研究并形成指南/共识,以帮助医务工作者在临床诊疗中更好地实施知情同意。
    作者贡献:谢静负责资料收集、撰写、修订论文;李姝、朱玲提出修改意见;张抒扬提出选题思路并审核论文。
    利益冲突:所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
  • [1] Department of Health, Education, and Welfare; National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research[J]. J Am Coll Dent, 2014, 81: 4-13.
    [2] Grady C. Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372: 855-862. doi:  10.1056/NEJMra1411250
    [3] Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine[M]. 8 Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2015: 49.
    [4] Fan R. Self-determination vs. family-determination: two incommensurable principles of autonomy: a report from East Asia[J]. Bioethics, 1997, 11: 309-322. doi:  10.1111/1467-8519.00070
    [5] 全国人民代表大会. 《中华人民共和国基本医疗卫生与健康促进法》[EB/OL]. (2019-12-29)[2020-12-29]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-12/29/content_5464861.htm.
    [6] 马晓. 中国国情与知情同意之思[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2018, 31: 962-965, 1001. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNLX201808003.htm

    Ma X. Reflection on China's National Conditions and Informed Consent[J]. Zhongguo Yixue Lunlixue, 2018, 31: 962-965, 1001. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNLX201808003.htm
    [7] 张渊. 患者偏好与医患共同决策[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2019, 10: 679-684. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.06.022

    Zhang Y. Patient Preference and Shared Decision Making[J]. Xiehe Yixue Zazhi, 2019, 10: 679-684. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.06.022
    [8] 强美英. 医疗知情同意的法伦理思考[J]. 医学与哲学, 2020, 31: 14-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXZX201005010.htm

    Qiang MY. The Legal Ethical Thought of Medical Informed Consent[J]. Yixue Yu Zhexue, 2020, 31: 14-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXZX201005010.htm
    [9] Siegler M, Collins ME, Cronin DC. Special challenges to the informed consent doctrine in the United States[J]. J Clin Ethics, 2004, 15: 38-47.
    [10] Annas GJ. Doctors, Patients, and Lawyers-Two Centuries of Health Law[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367: 445-450. doi:  10.1056/NEJMra1108646
    [11] 夏媛媛. 从知情同意的发展史正确认识知情同意权[J]. 医学与社会, 2007, 20: 44-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXSH200702018.htm
    [12] Chervenak J, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Surgery without consent or miscommunication? A new look at a landmark legal case[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212: 586-590. doi:  10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.062
    [13] Nuremberg Military Tribunal. The Nuremberg Code[J]. JAMA, 1996, 276: 1691. doi:  10.1001/jama.1996.03540200077043
    [14] Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding doctors in clinical research. Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964[EB/OL]. [2020-12-31]. https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/doh-jun1964/.
    [15] World Medical Association Declaration of Lisbon on the Rights of the Patient. Adopted by the 34th World Medical Assembly, Lisbon, Portugal, September/ October 1981[EB/OL]. [2020-12-31]. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-lisbon-on-the-rights-of-the-patient/.
    [16] 全国人民代表大会. 《中华人民共和国执业医师法》[EB/OL]. (2005-08-01)[2020-12-31]. http://www.gov.cn/banshi/2005-08/01/content_18970.htm.
    [17] 中华人民共和国国务院. 《医疗事故处理条例》[EB/OL]. (2005-08-02)[2020-12-31]. http://www.gov.cn/banshi/2005-08/02/content_19167.htm.
    [18] 全国人民代表大会. 《中华人民共和国民法典》(2020-06-01)[2020-12-31]. https://www.chinacourt.org/law/detail/2020/06/id/150163.shtml.
    [19] Cocanour CS. Informed consent-It's more than a signature on a piece of paper[J]. Am J Surg, 2017, 214: 993-997. doi:  10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.015
    [20] Perni S, Rooney MK, Horowitz DP, et al. Assessment of Use, Specificity, and Readability of Written Clinical Informed Consent Forms for Patients With Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2019, 5: e190260. doi:  10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0260
    [21] Tait AR, Hutchinson RJ. Informed Consent Training in Pediatrics-Are We Doing Enough?[J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2018, 172: 211-212. doi:  10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4088
    [22] Koller SE, Moore RF, Goldberg MB, et al. An Informed Consent Program Enhances Surgery Resident Education[J]. J Surg Educ, 2017, 74: 906-913. doi:  10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.02.002
    [23] Lee SC, Nguyen V, Nguyen A, et al. Teaching Anesthesiology Residents How to Obtain Informed Consent[J]. J Educ Perioper Med, 2019, 21: E632.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  961
  • HTML全文浏览量:  173
  • PDF下载量:  139
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-01-04
  • 录用日期:  2021-01-29
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-11-01
  • 刊出日期:  2022-01-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    【温馨提醒】近日,《协和医学杂志》编辑部接到作者反映,有多名不法人员冒充期刊编辑发送见刊通知,鼓动作者添加微信,从而骗取版面费的行为。特提醒您,本刊与作者联系的方式均为邮件通知或电话,稿件进度通知邮箱为:mjpumch@126.com,编辑部电话为:010-69154261,请提高警惕,谨防上当受骗!如有任何疑问,请致电编辑部核实。谢谢!