ICG荧光引导胸腔镜肺病变切除术在DRG支付下的住院费用与医疗效率分析

Cost and Medical Efficiency Analysis of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Guided Thoracoscopic Resection of Lung Lesions under the DRG Payment System

  • 摘要: 目的 基于疾病诊断相关分组(diagnosisrelatedgroups,DRG)支付方式,探究吲哚菁绿(indocyaninegreen,ICG)荧光引导下胸腔镜肺病变切除术的临床应用价值,以期为医疗机构新技术管理提供参考。方法以2016年1月1日—2024年5月31日于北京协和医院行胸腔镜肺段切除术和/或肺楔形切除术的出院患者为研究对象。其中,采用ICG荧光技术引导的患者纳入新技术组,未采用ICG荧光技术引导的患者纳入对照组。分析两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、费用消耗指数、时间消耗指数、呼吸机使用时间、住院总费用及10项代表性明细费用等指标。进一步采用倾向评分匹配,分析在控制年龄、性别、DRG编码及手术类型等混杂因素情况下的指标变化。结果 共入选符合纳入和排除标准的患者7999例,其中新技术组1392例(17.40%),对照组6607例(82.60%)。与对照组相比,新技术组手术时间和住院时间显著缩短,时间消耗指数、诊察诊疗费、护理费、治疗医用材料费、床位费、输氧费、抗菌药物费和白蛋白类制品费指标显著降低,费用消耗指数、住院总费用、手术费用和手术医用材料费均显著升高,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。在EB15(胸部大手术,不伴重要并发症与合并症)患者中,新技术组除呼吸机使用时间、西药费和有创呼吸机使用时间与对照组差异无统计学意义外,其他指标差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。在EB11(胸部大手术,伴重要并发症与合并症)患者中,新技术组仅白蛋白类制品费较对照组显著降低(P=0.003),其他指标差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。单独肺楔形切除术患者中,与对照组相比,新技术组手术时间和住院时间缩短,时间消耗指数、诊察诊疗费、护理费、治疗医用材料费、床位费、输氧费、西药费、抗菌药物费、白蛋白类制品费、住院总费用、费用消耗指数降低,手术医用材料费增加,差异均具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。采用倾向性评分匹配后,新技术组手术时间较对照组缩短,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.022);除西药费增多外,新技术组输氧费、抗菌药物费、白蛋白类制品费和治疗医用材料费均较对照组降低,差异具有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论 ICG荧光引导下胸腔镜肺病变切除术可显著提升医疗效率、优化费用结构,减少围术期支持性资源消耗。但其临床效益在不同手术类型或不同DRG分组患者中存在显著差异,建议临床医师加强术前精准评估。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical application value of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence-guided thoracoscopic lung lesion resection under the diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment system, and to provide reference for the management of new medical technologies in healthcare institutions. Methods Discharged patients who underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy and/or wedge resection at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2016 to May 31, 2024 were enrolled. Patients who received ICG fluorescence guidance were assigned to new technology group, while those who did not receive ICG fluorescence guidance were assigned to the control group. Operative time, length of stay, cost consumption index, time consumption index, duration of ventilator use, total hospitalization cost, and 10 representative cost items were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching was further used to analyze the changes in these indicators after controlling for confounding factors including age, sex, DRG code, and surgical type. Results A total of 7999 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled, including 1392 patients (17.40%) in the new technology group and 6607 patients (82.60%) in the control group. Compared with the control group, the new technology group showed significantly shorter operative time and length of stay, and significant reductions in time consumption index, consultation and diagnostic fees, nursing fees, therapeutic medical material fees, bed fees, oxygen therapy fees, antibiotic fees, and albumin product fees, while the cost consumption index, total hospitalization cost, surgical fees, and surgical medical material fees were significantly increased (all P<0.001). Among EB15 (major thoracic surgery without important complications or comorbidities) patients, all indicators except duration of ventilator use, western medicine fees, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (all P<0.001). Among patients in EB11 (major thoracic surgery with important complications or comorbidities), only albumin product fees were significantly lower in the new technology group than in the control group (P=0.003), with no statistically significant differences in other indicators (P>0.05). In patients undergoing wedge resection alone, the new technology group showed significantly shorter operative time and length of hospital stay, as well as significant reductions in time consumption index, consultation and diagnostic fees, nursing fees, therapeutic medical material fees, bed fees, oxygen therapy fees, western medicine fees, antibiotic fees, and albumin product fees, total hospitalization cost and cost consumption index, while surgical medical material fees increased (P<0.05). After propensity score matching, the operative time in the new technology group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P=0.022); except for increased western medicine fees, oxygen therapy fees, antibiotic fees, albumin product fees, and therapeutic medical material fees in the new technology group were all significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion ICG fluorescence-guided thoracoscopic lung lesion resection can significantly improve medical efficiency, optimize cost structure, and reduce perioperative supportive resource consumption. However, its clinical benefits vary significantly among patients with different surgical types or different DRG groups, so clinicians are advised to strengthen preoperative precise evaluation.

     

/

返回文章
返回