多参数MRI影像组学联合深度学习预测子宫内膜癌错配修复缺陷状态:多模态模型构建与初步验证

Prediction of Mismatch Repair Deficiency Status in Endometrial Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI Radiomics and Deep Learning: A Multimodal Model with Preliminary Validation

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨多参数MRI影像组学联合深度学习(deep learning,DL)的多模态模型在术前无创评估子宫内膜癌错配修复缺陷(mismatch repair deficiency,MMRd)状态中的临床价值。
    方法 回顾性选取北京协和医院2015年1月至2021年12月确诊为子宫内膜癌的患者为研究对象,按照8∶2将其随机分为训练集与验证集。收集患者的相关临床资料,提取术前增强T1加权成像(contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging,CE-T1WI)、T2压脂加权成像(fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging,fs-T2WI)和弥散加权成像(diffusion-weighted imaging,DWI)序列的影像组学特征与DL特征。采用递归特征消除算法进行特征降维,并生成组学评分(Rad-score)与DL评分(DL-score)。基于Logistic回归分别构建临床特征模型、临床-影像组学模型,以及融合临床、Rad-score与DL-score的临床-影像组学-深度学习联合模型。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)及DeLong检验评估各模型的预测性能。
    结果 共纳入509例患者,其中训练集413例,验证集96例。术前空腹血糖、组织学分级、淋巴结转移状态、Rad-score及DL-score被筛选为MMRd状态的独立预测因子。临床-影像组学-深度学习联合模型的预测效能最佳,其在训练集的AUC为0.699(95% CI:0.635~0.763),验证集的AUC为0.655(95% CI:0.535~0.775)。单一临床特征模型在训练集和验证集的AUC分别为0.629(95% CI:0.561~0.697)和0.578(95% CI:0.450~0.705);影像组学模型在训练集和验证集的AUC分别为0.641(95% CI:0.575~0.706)和0.611(95% CI:0.488~0.734)。DeLong检验结果显示,在训练集中,联合模型的预测性能优于单一临床模型(P=0.027)及单纯影像组学模型(P=0.044)。
    结论 本研究初步构建的临床-影像组学-深度学习联合模型,对子宫内膜癌患者的MMRd状态具有一定预测价值。引入DL特征可能有助于弥补传统影像组学评估的不足,为术前无创筛查提供了初步影像学参考。但受限于当前模型效能,其准确性与临床可推广性仍需通过多中心、大样本外部队列研究进一步验证。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the clinical value of a multimodal predictive model based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) radiomics combined with deep learning(DL) features for the preoperative noninvasive assessment of mismatch repair-deficient(MMRd) status in endometrial cancer(EC).
    Methods Patients diagnosed with EC at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 8∶2. Relevant clinical data were collected, and radiomics features and DL features were extracted from preoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging(CE-T1WI), fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging(fs-T2WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) sequences. High-dimensional feature selection and dimensionality reduction were performed sequentially using the recursive feature elimination(RFE) algorithm to generate a radiomics score(Rad-score) and a deep learning score(DL-score), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to construct a clinical model, a pure radiomics model, a clinical-radiomics model, and an integrated multimodal model incorporating clinical indicators, Rad-score, and DL-score. Model performance was assessed and compared using area under receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC) and DeLong test.
    Results A total of 509 patients were enrolled in this study, comprising 413 in the training cohort and 96 in the validation cohort. Independent predictors: Multivariate analysis indicated that preoperative fasting blood glucose level, histological grade, lymph node metastasis status, Rad-score, and DL-score were all independent significant predictors of MMRd status in EC patients. The integrated multimodal model demonstrated optimal predictive performance with an AUC of 0.699(95% CI: 0.635-0.763) in the training set, which was superior to the clinical model(AUC=0.629, 95% CI: 0.561-0.697) and the pure radiomics model(AUC=0.641, 95% CI: 0.575-0.706). In the validation set, the integrated model maintained good generalizability, achieving an AUC of 0.655(95% CI: 0.535-0.775), and its diagnostic efficacy was higher than that of the clinical model(AUC=0.578, 95% CI: 0.450-0.705) and the pure radiomics model(AUC=0.611, 95% CI: 0.488-0.734). According to the DeLong test, the incorporation of DL features resulted in the clinicalradiomicsdeep learning model performing better than both the clinicalonly model(P=0.027) and the radiomicsonly model(P=0.044) in the training cohort.
    Conclusions The initially developed clinical-radiomics-deep learning model exhibits a certain predictive potential for the MMRd status in patients with EC. The inclusion of DL features may help complement the limitations of traditional evaluations, offering a preliminary radiological reference for preoperative non-invasive screening. However, given the current diagnostic performance, its overall accuracy and clinical generalizability warrant further validation in multi-center, large-sample external cohort studies.

     

/

返回文章
返回