多参数MRI影像组学联合深度学习预测子宫内膜癌错配修复缺陷状态:多模态模型构建与初步验证

Prediction of Mismatch Repair Deficiency Status in Endometrial Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI Radiomics and Deep Learning: A Multimodal Model with Preliminary Validation

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨多参数MRI影像组学联合深度学习(deep learning,DL)的多模态模型在术前无创评估子宫内膜癌错配修复缺陷(mismatch repair deficiency,MMRd)状态中的临床价值。方法 回顾性选取北京协和医院2015年1月至2021年12月确诊为子宫内膜癌的患者为研究对象,按照8:2将其随机分为训练集与验证集。收集患者的相关临床资料,提取术前增强T1加权成像(contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging,CE-T1WI)、T2压脂加权成像(fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging,fs-T2WI)和弥散加权成像(diffusion-weighted imaging,DWI)序列的影像组学特征与DL特征。采用递归特征消除算法进行特征降维,并生成组学评分(Rad-score)与DL评分(DL-score)。基于Logistic回归分别构建临床特征模型、临床-影像组学模型,以及融合临床、Rad-score与DL-score的临床-影像组学-深度学习联合模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)及DeLong检验评估各模型的预测性能。结果 共纳入509例患者,其中训练集413例,验证集96例。术前空腹血糖、组织学分级、淋巴结转移状态、Rad-score及DL-score被筛选为MMRd状态的独立预测因子。临床-影像组学-深度学习联合模型的预测效能最佳,其在训练集的AUC为0.699 (95%CI:0.635~0.763),验证集的AUC为0.655 (95% CI:0.535~0.775)。单一临床特征模型在训练集和验证集的AUC分别为0.629 (95% CI:0.561~0.697)和0.578 (95% CI:0.450~0.705);影像组学模型在训练集和验证集的AUC分别为0.641 (95% CI:0.575~0.706)和0.611 (95% CI:0.488~0.734)。DeLong检验结果显示,在训练集中,联合模型的预测性能优于单一临床模型(P=0.027)及单纯影像组学模型(P=0.044)。结论 本研究初步构建的临床-影像组学-深度学习联合模型,对子宫内膜癌患者的MMRd状态具有一定预测价值。引入DL特征可能有助于弥补传统影像组学评估的不足,为术前无创筛查提供了初步影像学参考。但受限于当前模型效能,其准确性与临床可推广性仍需通过多中心、大样本外部队列研究进一步验证。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical value of a multimodal predictive model based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics combined with deep learning (DL) features for the preoperative noninvasive assessment of mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) status in endometrial cancer (EC). Methods Patients diagnosed with EC at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 8:2. Relevant clinical data were collected,and radiomics features and DL features were extracted from preoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI),fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (fs-T2WI),and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. High-dimensional feature selection and dimensionality reduction were performed sequentially using the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm to generate a radiomics score (Rad-score) and a deep learning score (DL-score),respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to construct a clinical model,a pure radiomics model,a clinical-radiomics model,and an integrated multimodal model incorporating clinical indicators,Rad-score,and DL-score. Model performance was assessed and compared using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and DeLong test. Results A total of 509 patients were enrolled in this study,comprising 413 in the training cohort and 96 in the validation cohort. Independent predictors:Multivariate analysis indicated that preoperative fasting blood glucose level,histological grade,lymph node metastasis status,Rad-score,and DL-score were all independent significant predictors of MMRd status in EC patients. The integrated multimodal model demonstrated optimal predictive performance with an AUC of 0.699 (95% CI:0.635-0.763) in the training set,which was superior to the clinical model (AUC=0.629,95% CI:0.561-0.697) and the pure radiomics model (AUC=0.641,95% CI:0.575-0.706). In the validation set,the integrated model maintained good generalizability,achieving an AUC of 0.655 (95% CI:0.535-0.775),and its diagnostic efficacy was higher than that of the clinical model (AUC=0.578,95% CI:0.450-0.705) and the pure radiomics model (AUC=0.611,95% CI:0.488-0.734). According to the DeLong test,the incorporation of DL features resulted in the clinicalra-diomicsdeep learning model performing better than both the clinicalonly model (P=0.027) and the radiomicsonly model (P=0.044) in the training cohort. Conclusions The initially developed clinical-radiomics-deep learning model exhibits a certain predictive potential for the MMRd status in patients with EC. The inclusion of DL features may help complement the limitations of traditional evaluations,offering a preliminary radiological reference for preoperative non-invasive screening. However,given the current diagnostic performance,its overall accuracy and clinical generalizability warrant further validation in multi-center,large-sample external cohort studies.

     

/

返回文章
返回