KRAS G12C抑制剂单药治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效与安全性:一项单臂Meta分析

Efficacy and Safety of KRAS G12C Inhibitor Monotherapy in Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

  • 摘要: 目的 在统一人群与推荐剂量框架下系统合并多种KRAS G12C抑制剂(KRAS G12C inhibitor,KRAS G12Ci)单药证据,在既往治疗的KRAS G12C突变晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)人群中建立疗效与安全性的可比基准区间,并探索潜在疗效影响因素。方法 系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov以及主要国际会议摘要,纳入KRAS G12C突变晚期或转移性NSCLC、G12Ci初治且接受推荐剂量单药治疗的临床试验队列。采用随机效应模型合并客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)、疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)、中位无进展生存期(median progression-free survival,mPFS)、中位总生存期(median overall survival,mOS)以及合并任何级别或≥3级治疗相关不良事件(treatment-related adverse event,TRAE)的发生率。基于合并比值比(odds ratio,OR)评估共突变和程序性死亡配体1(programmed death-ligand 1,PDL1)表达水平分层与ORR的关联。结果 单臂Meta分析共纳入11个独立研究队列。随机效应模型合并ORR为44%(95% CI:38%~49%),合并DCR为86%(95% CI:82%~88%),合并mPFS为7.70个月(95% CI:5.82~10.20),合并mOS为12.63个月(95% CI:10.07~15.83)。安全性方面,合并任意级别TRAE发生率为92%(95% CI:86%~96%),合并≥3级TRAE发生率为39%(95% CI:33%~45%);毒性谱以肝胆生化异常、肾功能/尿蛋白异常以及胃肠道反应为主。探索性分层分析提示,KEAP1共突变与较低ORR显著相关(合并OR=0.37,95% CI:0.21~0.65),而TP53共突变以及PD-L1(以1%、50%为阈值)未见明确分层信号;STK11共突变的合并效应差异无统计学意义(OR=0.63,95% CI:0.37~1.08)。结论 在既往接受过治疗的KRAS G12C突变晚期NSCLC患者中,KRAS G12Ci单药治疗能获得稳定的总体缓解率与疾病控制率,并形成可用于临床解释与跨研究对照的疗效与安全性基准区间。在治疗过程中,应重点加强肝胆生化指标、肾功能、尿蛋白以及胃肠道反应的规范化监测。探索性证据提示,KEAP1共突变可能是更具临床可操作性的负向分层信号。

     

    Abstract: Objective To systematically synthesize evidence on multiple KRAS G12C inhibitors (KRAS G12C inhibitors, KRAS G12Ci) as monotherapy within a unified population and recommended-dose framework, establish a comparable benchmark range of efficacy and safety for previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and explore potential effect modifiers. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conference abstracts, and included clinical-trial cohorts enrolling patients with advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC who were G12Ci-naïve and received recommended-dose G12Ci monotherapy. Random-effects models were used to pool objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and the incidence of any-grade and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). For biomarker stratification, pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated to assess associations between co-mutations and programmed death-ligand 1 expression and ORR. Results The single-arm meta-analysis included 11 independent study cohorts. The pooled ORR using a random-effects model was 44% (95% CI: 38%–49%) and the pooled DCR was 86% (95% CI: 82%– 88%). The pooled mPFS was 7.70 months (95% CI: 5.82–10.20) and the pooled mOS was 12.63 months (95% CI: 10.07–15.83). For safety, the pooled incidence of any-grade TRAEs was 92% (95% CI: 86%–96%), and grade ≥3 TRAEs was 39% (95% CI: 33%–45%). The toxicity profile was dominated by hepatobiliary laboratory abnormalities, renal dysfunction/proteinuria, and gastrointestinal events. Exploratory stratified analyses suggested that KEAP1 co-mutation was significantly associated with a lower ORR (OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.21–0.65); no significant stratification effect was observed for TP53 co-mutation or PD-L1 expression (at 1% and 50% cutoffs); and the association between STK11 co-mutation and ORR did not reach statistical significance (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.37–1.08). Conclusion In previously treated patients with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC, KRAS G12Ci monotherapy achieves stable overall response rates and disease control rates, yielding an efficacy and safety benchmark range that may facilitate clinical interpretation and cross-study comparisons. During treatment, standardized monitoring of hepatobiliary biochemistry, renal function, proteinuria, and gastrointestinal toxicities should be emphasized. Exploratory evidence indicates that KEAP1 co-mutation may represent a more actionable negative stratification signal.

     

/

返回文章
返回