睡眠与肺结节恶性风险的多源数据验证研究:问卷、队列与孟德尔随机化证据

Sleep Traits and Malignant Risk of Pulmonary Nodules: Evidence Triangulation Across Clinical, Cohort, and Mendelian Randomization

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨睡眠相关表型与肺结节恶性风险的关联性,并结合一般人群队列与遗传学证据提供补充线索。方法 本研究共包含3部分。第一部分为横断面研究,连续纳入2024年11月至2025年12月中国医科大学附属第一医院影像学证实的肺结节患者为研究对象。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(Pittsburgh sleep quality index,PSQI)相关条目构建9个睡眠板块,并按发生频率编码形成0~6分的板块严重度。基于病理结果或临床随访综合判定结节的良恶性,构建递进校正的多因素Logistic回归模型,并围绕失眠症状板块开展分层、交互及剂量-反应(分组与限制性立方样条)分析,以探究睡眠相关表型与肺结节恶性风险的关联。第二部分为前瞻性队列研究,基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study,CHARLS)队列,在一般人群中探究睡眠时长与新发肺癌风险的关联性。第三部分为遗传因果分析,包括两样本孟德尔随机化(mendelian randomization,MR)与连锁不平衡评分回归(linkage disequilibrium score regression,LDSC),数据来源于OpenGWAS数据库,旨在评估睡眠相关表型与肺癌风险之间是否存在方向性一致的遗传关联信号。结果 横断面研究中,共纳入肺结节患者800例,其中恶性组288例(36.0%)。在充分校正基础混杂因素、9个睡眠板块、影像学表现及抑郁与焦虑状况的连续变量主模型中,失眠症状板块严重度与肺结节恶性风险呈正向关联信号(充分校正模型:每增加1分,OR=1.147,95% CI 1.034~1.272,P=0.010) ;但分组剂量-反应分析及限制性立方样条分析未见二者关联性具有明确的单调趋势。分层分析显示,失眠症状板块严重度与肺结节恶性风险的关联在各亚组中方向总体一致;交互分析中失眠症状板块严重度与吸烟状态的交互项达到名义上统计学显著,提示可能存在效应异质性。前瞻性队列研究共纳入35159名年龄≥ 45岁的参与者,累计随访约8.0×104人年,共96例患者新发肺癌。以6~8 h睡眠时长作为参照组,短睡眠时长组(<6 h)肺癌风险呈升高趋势(HR=1.45,95% CI: 0.55~3.83,P=0.450),但未达统计学显著性水平;长睡眠时长组(>8 h)未见肺癌风险增加(HR=0.82,95% CI: 0.50~1.33,P=0.410)。遗传因果分析中,MR逆方差加权法主分析结果显示,遗传预测的失眠/入睡困难倾向(OR=1.76,95% CI 1.00~3.10,P=0.049)、长睡眠时长均与肺癌风险升高相关(OR=1.61,95% CI: 1.02~2.56,P=0.042),然而多种替代方法未提供一致性证据支持; LDSC分析显示,失眠/入睡困难与肺癌风险之间存在稳定的正向遗传相关。结论 在肺结节患者中,失眠相关症状与肺结节恶性风险之间存在关联信号,但其剂量-反应关系尚不明确。CHARLS队列与遗传分析可为上述关联性在方向上提供一定的补充线索,但统计学证据强度与结果一致性有限。睡眠表型与肺结节恶性风险关联性的确切结论仍需前瞻性研究进一步验证。

     

    Abstract: Objective To investigate the association between sleep-related phenotypes and the risk of malignancy in pulmonary nodules, and to provide complementary evidence from a general population cohort and genetic analyses. Methods This study comprised three parts. Part 1 was a cross-sectional study that consecutively enrolled patients with imaging-confirmed pulmonary nodules at the First Hospital of China Medical University from November 2024 to December 2025. Nine sleep domains were constructed using items from the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), with domain severity coded on a 0–6 scale according to the frequency of occurrence. Benign or malignant status of pulmonary nodules was determined based on pathological results or clinical follow-up. Multivariable Logistic regression models with progressive adjustment were constructed. Stratified, interaction, and dose–response analyses (including categorical grouping and restricted cubic splines) were performed focusing on the insomnia symptom domain to explore the association between sleep-related phenotypes and the risk of malignant pulmonary nodules. Part 2 was a prospective cohort study using the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to investigate the association between sleep duration and incident lung cancer risk in the general population. Part 3 comprised genetic causality analyses, including two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) and linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC), using data from the OpenGWAS database, to assess whether directionally consistent genetic association signals exist between sleep-related phenotypes and lung cancer risk. Results In the cross-sectional study, a total of 800 patients with pulmonary nodules were included, of whom 288 (36.0%) were in the malignant group. In the continuous-variable main model fully adjusted for baseline confounders, all nine sleep domains, imaging findings, and depression and anxiety status, the severity of the insomnia symptom domain showed a positive association signal with the risk of malignant pulmonary nodules (fully adjusted model: per 1-point increase, OR=1.147, 95% CI: 1.034–1.272, P=0.010). However, categorical dose–response analysis and restricted cubic spline analysis revealed no clear monotonic trend for this association. Stratified analyses showed that the direction of the association between insomnia symptom domain severity and malignant nodule risk was generally consistent across subgroups. In interaction analyses, the interaction term between insomnia symptom domain severity and smoking status reached nominal statistical significance, suggesting potential effect heterogeneity. The prospective cohort study included 35,159 participants aged ≥45 years, with a total follow-up of approximately 8.0×104 person-years, during which 96 patients developed incident lung cancer. Using a sleep duration of 6–8 hours as the reference group, the short sleep duration group (<6 hours) showed a trend toward increased lung cancer risk (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.55–3.83, P=0.450), but this did not reach statistical significance. The long sleep duration group (>8 hours) did not show an increased risk of lung cancer (HR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.50–1.33, P=0.410). In the genetic causality analyses, the primary inverse-variance weighted MR analysis showed that genetically predicted tendency to insomnia/difficulty falling asleep (OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.00–3.10, P=0.049) and longer sleep duration were both associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (OR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.02–2.56, P=0.042). However, multiple alternative methods did not provide consistent evidence to support these findings. LDSC analysis revealed a stable positive genetic correlation between insomnia/difficulty falling asleep and lung cancer risk. Conclusion In patients with pulmonary nodules, an association signal exists between insomnia-related symptoms and the risk of malignancy, but the dose–response relationship remains unclear. The CHARLS cohort and genetic analyses provide supplementary directional clues for the above associations, albeit with limited statistical strength and result consistency. Definitive conclusions regarding the association between sleep phenotypes and the risk of malignant pulmonary nodules require further validation in prospective studies.

     

/

返回文章
返回