药源性低磷血症的真实世界药物警戒研究

Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of Drug-Induced Hypophosphatemia

  • 摘要: 目的 挖掘药物相关低磷血症的风险信号,总结潜在的风险药物,为临床安全用药提供参考与警示。方法 基于4种不同类型的真实世界数据库,联合采用比例失衡分析及贝叶斯分析,对低磷血症信号强度进行挖掘。满足所有算法阈值者视为1个有效研究药物,并对有效研究药物的人口统计学特征、发作时间及患者结局进行分析。结果 共挖掘出131种具有低磷血症风险信号的有效研究药物,涉及7846例报告。其中,33种药物(25.19%)属于新的药物警戒信号。药物类别中,抗肿瘤药和免疫调节剂占比最高(48.09%),其次为全身用抗感染药(17.56%)。人口学特征方面,中青年患者(18~59岁)占比较高,男女报告比例为100∶143。信号强度较高的药物包括:透析液、阿德福韦酯、羧基麦芽糖铁、布罗索尤单抗、奥卡西平、Nirogacestat。发作时间上,多数抗肿瘤药的中位发作时间<30d。结局方面,50.24%的报告为严重不良结局;死亡报告占比前5位的药物依次为唑来膦酸、索拉非尼、地舒单抗、依维莫司、贝伐珠单抗。结论 临床应重点关注药品说明书无证据记载低磷血症风险的药物,对中青年、女性及肿瘤患者等高危人群加强监测。在临床实践中,建议基于药物风险信号实施分层监测,并依据监测结果及时采取停药、换药、补充电解质及水化等干预措施,以有效纠正低磷血症。

     

    Abstract: Objective To mine risk signals of drug-induced hypophosphatemia, summarize potential high-risk medications, and provide references and warnings for safe clinical medication. Methods Based on four distinct types of real-world databases, disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were combined to detect the signal strength of hypophosphatemia. Drugs meeting all algorithmic thresholds were defined as valid study drugs, and the demographic characteristics, onset time, and patient outcomes of these drugs were further analyzed. Results A total of 131 valid study drugs with hypophosphatemia risk signals were identified, involving 7,846 case reports. Among them, 33 drugs (25.19%) represented novel pharmacovigilance signals. In terms of drug classification, antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents accounted for the highest proportion (48.09%), followed by systemic anti-infectives (17.56%). Demographically, middle-aged and young adults (18-59 years) constituted a large share, with a male-to-female reporting ratio of 100:143. Drugs with the strongest signal strengths included dialysis solutions, adefovir dipivoxil, ferric carboxymaltose, burosumab, oxcarbazepine, and nirogacestat. Regarding onset time, the median time for most antineoplastic drugs was less than 30 days. For clinical outcomes, 50.24% of reports were classified as serious adverse outcomes; the top five drugs with the highest proportion of death reports were zoledronic acid, sorafenib, denosumab, everolimus, and bevacizumab. Conclusions Clinical attention should be focused on drugs without documented hypophosphatemia risks in their package inserts, and enhanced monitoring is recommended for high-risk populations including young and middle-aged individuals, women, and cancer patients. In clinical practice, it is recommended to implement stratified monitoring based on drug risk signals, and to take timely interventions-such as drug withdrawal, substitution, electrolyte supplementation, and hydration-with the aim of effectively correcting hypophosphatemia.

     

/

返回文章
返回