• 摘要: 神经重症病理生理机制复杂, 在高原环境下其发病率更高、损伤更重、救治难度更大。本共识基于国内外最新循证医学证据, 构建适用于高原及全国的规范化、目标导向神经重症管理框架。共识制订遵循国际证据质量评估标准, 经两轮德尔菲法专家函询, 形成涵盖管理体系、监测评估与核心策略三部分共32条推荐意见。核心更新内容包括: 倡导建立神经重症独立管理单元, 推行基于"重症五不同"理念的精准分级诊疗; 构建以脑血流、脑氧合、脑功能为核心的"三位一体"多模态脑监测体系, 强调常规开展床旁经颅多普勒超声、脑氧及持续脑电图监测; 在管理策略上, 推动从亚低温治疗向目标体温管理转变, 并明确超级重症阶段"446"目标化管理路径; 强调通过多模态方法评估静态与动态脑血管自调节功能, 实现个体化最佳平均动脉压管理; 提升脑脊液管理目标至"类淋巴系统"功能维护层面; 贯彻多学科协作全程管理模式, 关注患者长期神经功能预后; 降阶梯治疗依据包括脑结构恢复、脑血管自调节功能恢复、脑脊液动力学改善及生物标志物水平下降等多维指标; 并将人工智能等前沿技术融入重症后管理与康复规划。本共识系统整合神经重症全流程管理, 体现目标化、动态化、多模态融合的现代神经重症医学内涵, 旨在适应病理生理机制深化、医工结合与人工智能赋能的新趋势, 进一步推动重症医学学科发展。京藏神经重症监测管理专家共识(2025) 协和医学杂志

     

    Abstract: Neurocritical care involves complex pathophysiological mechanisms, and its incidence is higher, injuries are more severe, and treatment is more challenging in high-altitude environments. This consensus, based on the latest domestic and international evidence-based medical data, establishes a standardized, goal-oriented framework for neurocritical care management applicable in high-altitude regions and nationwide. The consensus was developed following international standards for evidence quality assessment and underwent two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, resulting in 32 recommendation statements covering three parts: management systems, monitoring and assessment, and core strategies. Key updates include: advocating for the establishment of independent neurocritical care units and implementing precise tiered diagnosis and treatment based on the "Five Differences in Critical Care" concept; constructing a "trinity" multimodal brain monitoring system centered on cerebral blood flow, cerebral oxygenation, and brain function, emphasizing routine bedside transcranial Doppler ultrasound, cerebral oximetry, and continuous electroencephalography monitoring; shifting management strategies from mild hypothermia therapy to targeted temperature management, and defining the "446" target management pathway for the supercritical stage; emphasizing the assessment of static and dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation functions through multimodal methods to achieve individualized optimal mean arterial pressure management; elevating cerebrospinal fluid management goals to the level of "glymphatic system" function maintenance; implementing a multidisciplinary collaborative, whole-process management model focusing on patients' long-term neurological functional outcomes; de-escalation criteria include multidimensional indicators such as recovery of brain structure, restoration of cerebrovascular autoregulation, improvement in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, and reduction in biomarker levels; and integrating cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence into post-critical care management and rehabilitation planning. This consensus systematically integrates the entire process of neurocritical care management, reflecting the modern connotation of goal-oriented, dynamic, and multimodal integration in neurocritical care medicine. It aims to adapt to new trends such as deepening understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, the integration of medicine and engineering, and the empowerment of artificial intelligence, thereby further advancing the discipline of critical care medicine.

     

/

返回文章
返回