Peyton四步教学法在肠道超声培训中的应用效果研究

peyton's Four-Step Teaching Method for Intestinal Ultrasound Training:Efficacy and Practical Implications

  • 摘要: 目的 评估Peyton四步教学法在肠道超声规范化培训中的应用价值,并与传统教学法进行比较,为临床超声教学提供优化方案。方法 选取2024年9月至2025年3月北京协和医院超声医学科的18名医师作为研究对象,将其随机分为传统教学组与Peyton教学组,每组9名学员。传统教学组采用"理论讲解-操作示范-模仿练习"的传统教学模式;Peyton教学组实施标准化"演示-解构-理解-执行"四步教学法。教学内容均为肠道超声标准切面扫查,培训后由带教老师对学员的操作技能进行独立评分。为验证教学方法的可重复性,传统教学组学员在完成首次考核后,补充接受Peyton四步教学法培训并进行二次考核。结果 Peyton教学组学员在各解剖部位显示的评分均显著优于传统教学组(P均<0.001),包括末段回肠7.3(6.5,8)分比(3.1±1.4)分、回盲部7(6,8)分比(3.7±1.3)分、阑尾8(7,8.3)分比(5.3±0.8)分、结肠7(6.5,7.7)分比5.3(2.8,5.3)分及小肠(7.3±0.5)分比(3.7±1.2)分。Peyton教学组的总体评分亦显著高于传统教学组(7.2±0.9)分比(3.7±1.0)分,P<0.001)。传统教学组在补充接受Peyton教学法培训后,各部位的超声探查能力均显著提升,总体评分提高至(7.5±0.4)分(P=0.008)。结论 Peyton四步教学法可显著提升住院医师肠道超声操作技能,教学效果明显优于传统教学方法,可作为肠道超声规范化培训的优选方法。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application value of the Peyton four-step teaching method in the standardized training of intestinal ultrasound and compare it with traditional teaching methods, so as to provide an optimized approach for clinical ultrasound training. Methods 18 participants from the Department of Ultrasound at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between September 2024 and March 2025 were randomly assigned to either the traditional group or Peyton group, with 9 in each group. The traditional group followed the conventional "lecturedemonstration-practice" model, while the Peyton group implemented the standardized "demonstration-deconstruction-comprehension-execution" four-step approach. All training focused on standard intestinal ultrasound scanning techniques. After the training, the operational skills were independently evaluated by the instructors. To verify the reproducibility of the teaching method, the participants in traditional teaching group received additional Peyton method training after the initial assessment and underwent a second evaluation. Results Participants in the Peyton group demonstrated significantly higher scores than those in the traditional group at every anatomical site assessed (all P<0.001)., including the terminal ileum7.3(6.5,8) vs. (3.1±1.4), ileocecal region7(6,8) vs. (3.7±1.3), appendix8(7,8.3) vs. (5.3±0.8), colon7(6.5,7.7) vs. 5.3 (2.8,5.3) and small intestine(7.3±0.5) vs. (3.7±1.2). The overall score was also significantly higher in the Peyton group(7.2±0.9) vs.(3.7±1.0), P<0.001. After receiving supplemental Peyton method training, the traditional group showed significant improvement in all anatomical site scores, with the overall score increasing to(7.5±0.4), P=0.008. Conclusion The Peyton four-step method is significantly more effective than traditional teaching in improving residents' intestinal ultrasound skills, demonstrating its suitability as the preferred approach for standardized training programs.

     

/

返回文章
返回