基于健康信念模型的40岁及以上女性乳腺自检现状调查及影响因素分析

Analysis of Current Status and Influencing Factors of Breast Self-Examination Among Women Aged Over 40 Based on the Health Belief Model

  • 摘要: 目的 乳腺癌是中国女性面临的重大健康威胁,早期诊断率偏低与公众认知不足及健康宣教不足密切相关。本研究基于健康信念模型(health belief model,HBM),首次在国内针对40岁及以上女性开展多场景乳腺自检现状调查,重点分析影响该群体乳腺自检实践的健康信念因素。方法 2024年6月至2025年6月,从北京市某大型社区、北京协和医院乳腺外科门诊(医院随机组)及体检中心三个场景纳入40岁及以上女性,采用面对面访谈方式收集人口学特征、健康行为及HBM核心变量(感知益处、感知障碍、行动线索、自我效能相关指标)。采用多因素Logistic回归分析各场景中乳腺自检实践的影响因素。结果 本研究纳入40岁及以上女性共3954名。三组人群在年龄、教育程度、职业类型、家族史及体检规律性上差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.001)。不规律体检比例以医院随机组最高(45.7%),社区组次之(10.9%),体检中心组最低(5.5%);其归因各异,医院随机组和体检中心组以“认为没必要”为主(分别占91.9%和72.0%),社区组则以“就医不便(无人陪伴)”(34.1%)和“经济因素”(24.6%)为主要障碍。各组乳腺自检的益处知晓率虽较高(社区组94.6%),但方法知晓率(19.1%~35.4%)和定期实践率(7.8%~27.3%)均明显偏低。多因素回归显示,各场景乳腺自检实践的影响因素差异显著:社区组中,≥65岁(OR=0.993,95%CI:0.988~0.997)、不知晓自检方法(OR=0.372,95%CI:0.370~0.374)者的乳腺自检实践率更低;医院随机组中,不知晓自检方法(OR=0.813,95%CI:0.775~0.852)者的乳腺自检实践率更低;体检中心组中,不知晓自检益处(OR=0.509,95%CI:0.474~0.546)者的乳腺自检实践率更低。结论 乳腺自检在各类人群中完成度均不高,与女性未掌握正确自检方法及健康信念不足相关。未来乳腺癌防治科普工作需更深入、更广泛地开展,尤其针对不同场景人群的特点,提升女性乳腺自检实践率,助力乳腺癌的早期发现与干预。

     

    Abstract: Objective Breast cancer poses a major health threat to Chinese women, and the suboptimal early diagnosis rate is closely associated with insufficient public awareness and inadequate health education. This study, for the first time in China, conducted a multi-setting survey on breast self-examination (BSE) among women aged 40 years and above based on the Health Belief Model (HBM), with a specific focus on analyzing the HBM-related factors influencing BSE practice in this population. Methods From June 2024 to June 2025, a total of 3,954 women aged 40 years and above were enrolled from three settings in Beijing:a large community, the breast surgery outpatient clinic of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (random hospital group), and a physical examination center. Face-to-face interviews were conducted to collect data on demographic characteristics, health behaviors, and core HBM constructs (perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy-related indicators). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with BSE practice in each setting. Results Significant differences were observed across the three groups in age, education level, occupation type, family history, and regularity of physical examination (all P<0.001). The proportion of irregular physical examinations was highest in the random hospital group (45.7%), followed by the community group (10.9%) and the physical examination center group (5.5%); the reasons varied, with "unnecessary" being predominant in the hospital and examination-center groups (91.9% and 72.0%, respectively), whereas "inconvenient access (lack of accompaniment)" (34.1%) and "economic constraints" (24.6%) were the main barriers in the community group. Although the awareness rate of BSE benefits was relatively high in all groups (up to 94.6% in the community group), the rates of knowing correct BSE methods (19.1%-35.4%) and regular BSE practice (7.8%-27.3%) were markedly low. Multivariate regression revealed setting-specific influencing factors:in the community group, women aged ≥ 65 years (OR=0.993, 95% CI:0.988-0.997) and those unaware of BSE methods (OR=0.372, 95% CI:0.370-0.374) had significantly lower BSE practice rates; in the random hospital group, those unaware of BSE methods (OR=0.813, 95% CI:0.775-0.852) had lower BSE practice rates; and in the physical examination center group, those unaware of BSE benefits (OR=0.509, 95% CI:0.474-0.546) had lower BSE practice rates. Conclusions The completion rate of BSE remains low across all populations, which is associated with women's lack of mastery of correct BSE methods and insufficient health beliefs. Future breast cancer prevention and control education efforts should be more in-depth and extensive, with targeted strategies based on the characteristics of populations in different settings to improve women's BSE practice rates and promote early detection and intervention of breast cancer.

     

/

返回文章
返回