颈动脉超声对老年胃肠道肿瘤手术患者麻醉诱导后低血压的预测价值

Predictive Value of Carotid Ultrasound for Post-induction Hypotension in Elderly Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Tumor Surgery

  • 摘要: 目的 探讨颈动脉校正血流时间(corrected flow time,FTc)和速度时间积分(velocity time integral,VTI)对胃肠道肿瘤手术患者麻醉诱导后低血压(post-induction hypotension,PIH)的预测价值。方法 以择期行胃肠道肿瘤手术且美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)麻醉分级为Ⅰ~Ⅲ级的患者为研究对象。所有患者麻醉诱导前采用超声测量颈动脉VTI和FTc,根据麻醉诱导后是否发生低血压将其分为低血压组和非低血压组。采用受试者操作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估VTI、FTc及二者联合对PIH的预测效能,并通过多因素Logistic回归分析筛选PIH的影响因素。结果 本研究共纳入115例患者,剔除2例颈动脉频谱欠清晰者,2例手术取消者和3例入室后多次测量收缩压超过180 mmHg者后,最终纳入108例患者,其中麻醉诱导后43例(39. 8%)发生低血压(低血压组),65例(60. 2%)未发生低血压(非低血压组)。低血压组收缩压(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)以及ASA分级为Ⅲ级和合并高血压患者的占比均高于非低血压组,FTc短于非低血压组,VTI低于非低血压组,差异具有统计学意义(P均<0. 05)。FTc预测PIH的ROC曲线下面积为0. 899(95% CI:0. 766~0. 920,P<0. 05),灵敏度为86. 0%,特异度为81. 5%;VTI预测PIH的ROC曲线下面积为0. 807(95% CI:0. 721~0. 892,P<0. 05),灵敏度为79. 1%,特异度为75. 4%;FTc与VTI联合预测PIH的ROC曲线下面积为0. 909(95% CI:0. 853~0. 965,P<0. 05),灵敏度为95. 3%,特异度75. 4%。FTc和VTI联合预测PIH的效能高于FTc或VTI单独预测。FTc、VTI均与SBP下降百分比(decrease percentage of systolic blood pressure,SBP%)和MAP下降百分比(decrease per-centage of mean arterial pressure,MAP%)呈负相关,且FTc与SBP%的相关性强于VTI%。FTc与SBP%呈中等负相关(r=-0. 430,P<0. 001),VTI与SBP%呈弱负相关(r=-0. 240,P=0. 012)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,体重指数、年龄、ASA分级(Ⅲ级)、VTI、SBP、MAP差异无统计学意义(P均>0. 05),而FTc差异有统计学意义(P<0. 05)。结论 颈动脉FTc、VTI均能预测老年胃肠道肿瘤手术患者PIH的发生情况,但FTc的预测效能高于VTI,二者联合应用对老年胃肠道肿瘤手术患者发生PIH的预测效能高于FTc或VTI单独预测。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the predictive value of carotid corrected flow time (FTc) and velocity time integral (VTI) for post-induction hypotension (PIH) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery. Methods Patients scheduled for elective gastrointestinal tumor surgery with an American Society of Anesthesiol- ogists (ASA) anesthesia classification ofⅠ-Ⅲ were selected as the study subjects. Before anesthesia induction, carotid VTI and FTc were measured using ultrasound in all patients. According to whether hypotension occurred after anesthesia induction, the patients were divided into a hypotension group and a non-hypotension group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive efficacy of VTI, FTc, and their combination for PIH. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to screen the influencing factors of PIH. Results A total of 115 patients were included in this study. After excluding 2 patients with unclear carotid spectra, 2 patients with canceled surgeries, and 3 patients with multiple systolic blood pressure measurements ex- ceeding 180 mmHg after entering the operating room, 108 patients were finally included. Among them, 43 patients (39. 8%) developed hypotension after anesthesia induction (hypotension group), and 65 patients (60. 2%) did not develop hypotension (non-hypotension group). The proportions of patients with higher systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), ASA classification of Ⅲ, and concurrent hypertension in the hypotension group were all higher than those in the non-hypotension group. The FTc in the hypotension group was shorter, and the VTI was lower than those in the non-hypotension group, with statistically significant differences (all P<0. 05). The area under the ROC curve for FTc in predicting PIH was 0. 899 (95% CI:0. 766-0. 920, P<0. 05), with a sensitivity of 86. 0% and a specificity of 81. 5%. The area under the ROC curve for VTI in predicting PIH was 0. 807 (95% CI:0. 721-0. 892, P<0. 05), with a sensitivity of 79. 1% and a specificity of 75. 4%. The area under the ROC curve for the combined prediction of FTc and VTI for PIH was 0. 909 (95% CI:0. 853-0. 965, P<0. 05), with a sensitivity of 95. 3% and a specificity of 75. 4%. The predictive efficacy of the combined FTc and VTI for PIH was higher than that of FTc or VTI alone. Both FTc and VTI were negatively correlated with the decrease percentage of systolic blood pressure (SBP%) and the decrease percentage of mean arterial pressure (MAP%), and the correlation between FTc and SBP% was stronger than that between VTI and SBP%. FTc showed a moderate negative correlation with SBP% (r=-0. 430, P<0. 001), and VTI showed a weak negative correlation with SBP% (r=-0. 240, P=0. 012). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there were no statistically significant differences in body mass index, age, ASA classification (Ⅲ grad- ing), VTI, SBP, and MAP (all P>0. 05), while FTc showed a statistically significant difference (P<0. 05). Conclusions Both carotid FTc and VTI can predict the occurrence of PIH in elderly patients un- dergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery, but the predictive efficacy of FTc is higher than that of VTI. The com- bined application of FTc and VTI has a higher predictive efficacy for the occurrence of PIH in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery than FTc or VTI alone.

     

/

返回文章
返回