Email Alert RSS
Volume 10 Issue 4
Sep.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital  > 2019  >  10(4): 375-380
Yao WANG, Jia-xin YANG. Application of Robotic Surgical System in Gynecology[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(4): 375-380. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.04.013
Citation: Yao WANG, Jia-xin YANG. Application of Robotic Surgical System in Gynecology[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2019, 10(4): 375-380. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.04.013
shu

Application of Robotic Surgical System in Gynecology

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2019.04.013

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author: YANG Jia-xin Tel: 86-10-69154022, E-mail: yangjiaxin@pumch.cn
  • Received Date: 2017-08-19
  • Publish Date: 2019-07-30
    Abstract
  • With the improvement of medicine and surgical instruments, robotic surgery has been increasingly applied as a new minimally invasive surgical approach to gynecology field.Compared with conventional laparotomy and laparoscopic surgery, it has advantages of clear three-dimensional vision, a 360° rotating arm to simulate the flexibility of human wrist, more precise operation, short learning curve, and so on.
    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(47)
  • [1] Diana M, Marescaux J. Robotic surgery[J]. Br J Surg, 2015, 102:e15-e28. doi:  10.1002/bjs.9711
    [2] Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H.et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study[J].Fertil Steril, 2000, 73:1040-1042. doi:  10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00423-4
    [3] Daneshqari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, et al. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advan-ced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes[J]. BJU Int, 2007, 100:875-879. doi:  10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07109.x
    [4] Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 118:1005-1013. doi:  10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c
    [5] Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 123:5-12. doi:  10.1097/AOG.0000000000000006
    [6] Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2016, 132:284-291. doi:  10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.008
    [7] van Iersel JJ, de Witte CJ, Verheijen PM, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolporectopexy for multicompartment prolapse of the pelvic floor: a prospective cohort study evaluating functional and sexual outcome[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2016, 59:968-974. doi:  10.1097/DCR.0000000000000669
    [8] Brudie LA, Gaia G, Ahmad S, et al. Peri-operative outcomes of patients with stage IV endometriosis undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery[J]. J Robot Surg, 2012, 6:317-322. doi:  10.1007/s11701-011-0314-3
    [9] Nezhat CR, Stevens A, Balassiano E, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2015, 22:40-44. doi:  10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.002
    [10] Chen SH, Li ZA, Du XP. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis: a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 43:422-426. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27328505/
    [11] Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X, et al. Laparoscopy vs. robotic surgery for endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2017, 107:996-1002.e3. doi:  10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.033
    [12] Araujo SE, Seid VE, Marques RM, et al. Advantages of the robotic approach to deep infiltrating rectal endometrio-sis: because less is more[J]. J Robot Surg, 2016, 10:165-169. doi:  10.1007/s11701-016-0586-8
    [13] Gobern JM, Rosemeyer CJ, Barter JF, et al. Comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy in a community hospital[J]. JSLS, 2013, 17:116-120. doi:  10.4293/108680812X13517013317473
    [14] Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID. Robotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2016, 294:5-17. doi:  10.1007/s00404-016-4061-6
    [15] Nezhat C, Lavie O, Hsu S, et al. Robotic-assisted laparo-scopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myom-ectomy—a retrospective matched control study[J]. Fertil Steril, 2009, 91:556-559. doi:  10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.092
    [16] Göçmen A, Sanlikan F, Ucar MG. Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy outcomes with laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2013, 287:91-96. doi:  10.1007/s00404-012-2530-0
    [17] Tusheva OA, Gyang A, Patel SD.Reproductive outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM)[J]. J Robot Surg, 2013, 7:65-69. doi:  10.1007/s11701-012-0354-3
    [18] Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience[J]. Am J Surg, 2006, 191:555-560. doi:  10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.011
    [19] Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease[J]. JAMA, 2013, 309:689-698. doi:  10.1001/jama.2013.186
    [20] Deimling TA, Eldridge JL, Riley KA, et al. Randomized cont-rolled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2017, 136:64-96. doi:  10.1002/ijgo.12001
    [21] Truong M, Kim JH, Scheib S, et al. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 28:304-310. doi:  10.1097/GCO.0000000000000293
    [22] Howard DL.Risk factors and outcomes for conversion to laparotomy of laparoscopic hysterectomy in benign gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 129:751-752. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28333800
    [23] Lim CS, Mowers EL, Mahnert N, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for conversion to laparotomy of laparoscopic hysterec-tomy in benign gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 128:1295-1305. doi:  10.1097/AOG.0000000000001743
    [24] Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Mariani A, et al. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 205:119, e1-e12. doi:  10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.024
    [25] Paley PJ, Veljovich DS, Shah CA, et al. Surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology in the era of robotics: analysis of first 1000 cases[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 204:551, e1-e9. doi:  10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.059
    [26] Pulman KJ, Dason ES, Philp L, et al. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2017, 136:315-319. doi:  10.1002/ijgo.12073
    [27] Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, et al. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with tradi-tional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review[J].Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116:1422-1431. doi:  10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f74153
    [28] Li XM, Wang J. Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 2017, 52:175-183. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28355689
    [29] Chen SH, Li ZA, Huang R, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: a meta-analysis[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 55:488-494. doi:  10.1016/j.tjog.2016.01.003
    [30] Ind T, Laios A, Hacking M, et al. A comparison of operative outcomes between standard and robotic laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Med Robot, Epub 2017. doi:  10.1002/rcs.1851
    [31] Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M. Robotic radical hysterec-tomy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 198:649, e1-e4. doi:  10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.002
    [32] Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, et al.Oncolo-gical outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study[J]. BJOG, 2014, 121:1538-1545. doi:  10.1111/1471-0528.12822
    [33] Gil-Ibáñez B, Díaz-Feijoo B, Pérez-Benavente A, et al. Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2013, 9:339-344. doi:  10.1002/rcs.1480
    [34] Shazly SA, Murad MH, Dowdy SC, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 138:457-471. doi:  10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.009
    [35] Zhou J, Xiong BH, Ma L, et al. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2016, 12:145-154. doi:  10.1002/rcs.1652
    [36] Hong DG, Lee YS, Park NY, et al. Robotic uterine artery preservation and nerve-sparing radical trachelectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2011, 21:391-396. doi:  10.1097/IGC.0b013e31820b3003
    [37] Nick AM, Frumovitz MM, Soliman PT, et al. Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: open vs. robotic radical trachelectomy[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 124:276-280. doi:  10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.035
    [38] Vieira MA, Rendón GJ, Munsell M, et al. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 138:585-589. doi:  10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.023
    [39] Feuer GA, Lakhi N, Barker J, et al. Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 131:520-524. doi:  10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.022
    [40] Gallotta V, Cicero C, Conte C, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic staging for early ovarian cancer: a c-matched control study[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24:293-298. doi:  10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.004
    [41] Finger TN, Nezhat FR. Robotic-assisted fertility-sparing surgery for early ovarian cancer[J].JSLS, 2014, 18:308-313. doi:  10.4293/108680813X13654754535557
    [42] Choi EJ, Rho AM, Lee SR, et al. Robotic single-site myomectomy: clinical analysis of 61 consecutive cases[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24:632-639. doi:  10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.003
    [43] Gungor M, Kahraman K, Dursun P, et al. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic[J]. J Robot Surg, 2017, Epub ahead of print. doi:  10.1007%2Fs11701-017-0699-8
    [44] Vizza E, Corrado G, Mancini E, et al. Robotic single-site hysterectomy in low risk endometrial cancer: a pilot study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20:2759-2764. doi:  10.1245/s10434-013-2922-9
    [45] Fader AN, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2009, 114:157-161. doi:  10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.020
    [46] Sinno AK, Fader AN. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology[J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 102:922-932. doi:  10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.08.020
    [47] Pasic RP, Rizzo JA, Fang H, et al. Comparing robot-assisted with conventionallaparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2010, 17:730-738. doi:  10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.009
    • Relative Articles(0)
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (231) PDF downloads(208) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    Links: National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences(CAMS) AMLC Check CNKI Database CNKI Term Online Chinese General Practice
    Address：Room 302,Third Floor,Building 7, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China
    Tel：010-69154261/4262
    E - mail：medj@pumch.cn
    mjpumch@126.com
    Copyright of website：Editorial Office of Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return