Ran ZHOU, Tong-juan ZOU, Wan-hong YIN, Yao QIN, Yi LI, Jing YANG, Yan KANG. nfluence of Mitral Regurgitation on the Prognosis of Patients with Septic Shock[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2018, 9(5): 426-430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.05.010
Citation: Ran ZHOU, Tong-juan ZOU, Wan-hong YIN, Yao QIN, Yi LI, Jing YANG, Yan KANG. nfluence of Mitral Regurgitation on the Prognosis of Patients with Septic Shock[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2018, 9(5): 426-430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.05.010

nfluence of Mitral Regurgitation on the Prognosis of Patients with Septic Shock

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.05.010
More Information
  • Corresponding author: KANG Yan    Tel:028-85422739, E-mail:kangyan@scu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2018-07-04
  • Publish Date: 2018-09-30
  •   Objective  The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of mitral regurgitation for patients with septic shock in the department of critical care medicine.  Methods  General clinical information and cardiac valves function of patients with septic shock from April to August 2016 in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University were collected and analyzed retrospectively from the database of SHOCK-ICU(NCT03082326). All the patients were divided into the survival group and the death group based on whether they died in 28 days after enrollment. The effects of regurgitation of the mitral valve and other valves on the prognosis were compared by the Logistic regression model. The effect of mitral regurgitation on the survival of 28 days in patients with septic shock was analyzed.  Results  Totally 111 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 67 males and 44 females with the average age of (57.5±18.5) years. The score of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ) and the 28-day mortality were 23.6±8.6 and 46.8% (52/111), respectively. The univariate analysis showed that mitral regurgitation and the lung ultrasound aeration loss score (LUSS) of the death group were higher than those of the survival group (P=0.039 and P=0.020). Mitral regurgitation and LUSS were independent risk factors for the 28-day mortality (P=0.015 and P=0.020) by Logistic multivariate analysis. The 28-day survival rate of patients with mitral regurgitation (38.2%, 13/34) was significantly lower than that of the non-mitral regurgitation group (59.7%, 46/77) (P=0.039) by the survival analysis.  Conclusions  Mitral regurgitation is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with septic shock.
  • loading
  • [1] Seymour CW, Rosengart MR, et al. Septic Shock: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment [J]. JAMA, 2015, 314: 708-717. doi:  10.1001/jama.2015.7885
    [2] Martin GS. Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: changes in incidence, pathogens and outcomes [J]. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2012, 10: 701-706. doi:  10.1586/eri.12.50
    [3] Chillet P. The definition and epidemiology of septic shock [J]. Soins, 2012, 766: 32-33. doi:  10.1016/j.soin.2012.04.007
    [4] Cecconi M, De Backer A, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European society of Intensive Care Medicine [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2014, 40: 1795-1815. doi:  10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
    [5] 刘大为.休克的治疗:血流动力学启示录[J].协和医学杂志, 2017, 8:322-325. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2017.06.001
    [6] Simmons J, Ventetuolo C. Cardiopulmonary monitoring of shock [J]. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2017, 23: 223-231. doi:  10.1097/MCC.0000000000000407
    [7] Frankel HL, Kirkpatrick AW, Elbarbary M, et al. Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ⅲ Patients-Part Ⅰ: General Ultrasonography [J]. Crit Care Med, 2015, 43: 2479-2502. doi:  10.1097/CCM.0000000000001216
    [8] Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2012, 38: 577-591. doi:  10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4
    [9] 尹万红, 李易, 秦瑶, 等.二尖瓣舒张早期血流峰速度与瓣环运动速度比值在评价严重脓毒症肺水肿中的价值[J].四川大学学报(医学版), 2016, 47: 580-583. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90551A/20164/669464967.html
    [10] Trichon BH, Felker GM, Shaw LK, et al. Relation of frequency and severity of mitral regurgitation to survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2003, 95: 538-543. doi:  10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03301-5
    [11] Cioffi G, Tarantini L, De Feo S, et al. Functional mitral regurgitation predicts 1-year mortality in elderly patients with systolic chronic heart failure [J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2005, 7: 1112-1117. doi:  10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.01.016
    [12] 尹万红, 王小亭, 刘大为, 等.重症超声临床应用技术规范[J].中华内科杂志, 2018, 57: 397-417. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2018.06.004
    [13] Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock [J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370: 583. doi:  10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.009
    [14] Vincent JL, Ince C, Bakker J. Circulatory shock-an update: a tribute to Professor Max Harry Weil [J]. Crit Care, 2012, 16: 239. doi:  10.1186/cc11510
    [15] 曾学英, 廖雪莲, 陈瑶, 等.微循环监测在脓毒症休克患者中的应及进展[J].中国呼吸与危监护杂志, 2014, 13: 319-322. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zghxywzjhzz201403025
    [16] European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med, 2014, 40: 1795-1815.
    [17] American College of Cardiology. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Prac-tice Guidelines [J]. Circulation, 2014, 130: 2354-2394. doi:  10.1161/CIR.0000000000000133
    [18] European Society of Cardiology. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism [J]. Eur Heart J, 2014, 35: 3033-3073. doi:  10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283
    [19] Jacob R, Stewart WJ. A practical approach to the quantification of valvular regurgitation [J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2007, 9: 105-111. doi:  10.1007/BF02938336
    [20] Bursi F, Barbieri A, Grigioni F, et al. Prognostic implica-tions of functional mitral regurgitation according to the severity of the underlying chronic heart failure: a long term outcome study [J]. Eur J Hcart Fail, 2010, 12: 382-388. doi:  10.1093/eurjhf/hfq014
    [21] 潘文志, 周达新, 葛均波.二尖瓣反流机制的新认识及其应用[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2017, 10: 43-46. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgyxqyzz201710008
    [22] American College of Cardiology. 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Management of Mitral Regurgitation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017, 70: 2421-2449. doi:  10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.019
    [23] Avierinos JF, Gersh BJ, Melton LJ III, et al. Natural history of asymptomatic mitral valve prolapse in the community [J]. Circulation, 2002, 106: 1355-1361. doi:  10.1161/01.CIR.0000028933.34260.09
    [24] 邹同娟, 尹万红, 秦瑶, 等.改良肺部超声失充气评分对重症医学科内休克患者预后的价值[J].中华医学杂志, 2017, 97: 2244-2247. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.29.002
    [25] 马秀娥.彩色多普勒超声心动图对135例二尖瓣返流的观察[J].中国现代临床医学, 2008, 7: 65. http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_modern-chinese-clinical-medicine_thesis/0201229300592.html
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (285) PDF downloads(49) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return