Email Alert RSS
Volume 13 Issue 2
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital  > 2022  >  13(2): 235-254
Multi-disciplinary Team for Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, National Rare Diseases Committee. Expert Consensus on the Application of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Orphan Drugs(2022)[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(2): 235-254. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0013
Citation: Multi-disciplinary Team for Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, National Rare Diseases Committee. Expert Consensus on the Application of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Orphan Drugs(2022)[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(2): 235-254. doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0013
shu

Expert Consensus on the Application of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis in Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Orphan Drugs(2022)

doi: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0013
Funds:

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 3332021003

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences CIFMS 2021-I2M-1-003

Youth Research Fund of Peking Union Medical College Hospital pumch201911755

More Information

    Corresponding authors: ZHANG Bo1, 3, E-mail: zhangbopumch@163.com
    ZHANG Shuyang2, 3, E-mail: shuyangzhang103@163.com
    1. Department of Pharmacy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
    3. State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

  • Received Date: 2022-01-09
  • Accepted Date: 2022-02-25
  • Publish Date: 2022-03-30
    Abstract
  • Comprehensive drug evaluation is an important technical tool for decision-making on drug supply. Traditional health technology of evaluation provides methodological references for comprehensive clinical evalu-ation of drugs. However, there is a lack of sufficient data from clinical trials for orphan drugs. It is difficult to evaluate the clinical and economic value of orphan drugs with the criteria of ordinary drugs. Particularity of orphan drugs makes it difficult to use the evaluation methods of traditional health technology. Multi-criteria decision analysis explores the comprehensive value of drugs from various aspects. It promotes the transparency and scientific thinking of evidence-based decision-making, and improves the quality of decision-making, and thus provides a potential solution to the comprehensive clinical evaluation of orphan drugs. However, its application in the comprehensive evaluation of orphan drugs in China is still in its infancy and exploratory stage, and there is a lack of methodological guidelines. In order to improve the construction of a diversified system for comprehensive clinical evaluation of orphan drugs in China, the Multi-disciplinary Team for Rare Diseases of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and the National Rare Diseases Committee organized experts in related fields to formulate this consensus, aiming to provide methodological standards for comprehensive clinical evaluation of orphan drugs.
    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(55)
  • [1] 中国罕见病联盟. 罕见病药物卫生技术评估专家共识(2019版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2020.
    [2] Lasalvia P, Prieto-Pinto L, Moreno M, et al. International experiences in multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for evaluating orphan drugs: a scoping review[J]. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 2019, 19: 409-420. doi:  10.1080/14737167.2019.1633918
    [3] Friedmann C, Levy P, Hensel P, et al. Using multi-criteria decision analysis to appraise orphan drugs: a systematic review[J]. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 2018, 18: 135-146. doi:  10.1080/14737167.2018.1414603
    [4] Németh B, Molnár A, Bozóki S, et al. Comparison of weighting methods used in multicriteria decision analysis frameworks in healthcare with focus on low- and middle-income countries[J]. J Comp Eff Res, 2019, 8: 195-204. doi:  10.2217/cer-2018-0102
    [5] 刘鑫, 唐彦, 左玮, 等. 国外孤儿药综合评价概述及启示[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2020, 18: 85-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCYW202006017.htm

    Liu X, Tang Y, Zuo W, et al. Overview and enlightenment of the comprehensive evaluation for orphan drugs abroad[J]. Linchuang Yaowu Zhiliao Zazhi, 2020, 18: 85-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCYW202006017.htm
    [6] Broekhuizen H, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, van Til JA, et al. A review and classification of approaches for dealing with uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis for healthcare decisions[J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2015, 33: 445-455. doi:  10.1007/s40273-014-0251-x
    [7] Thokala P, Duenas A. Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment[J]. Value Health, 2012, 15: 1172-1181. doi:  10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.015
    [8] Schey C, Krabbe PF, Postma MJ, et al. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): testing a proposed MCDA framework for orphan drugs[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2017, 12: 10. doi:  10.1186/s13023-016-0555-3
    [9] 尚俊美, 刘鑫, 陈丽萌, 等. 多准则决策分析在孤儿药综合评价中的应用进展[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2021, 56: 1785-1790.

    Shang JM, Liu X, Chen LM, et al. Application progress of multi-criteria decision analysis in assessment of orphan drugs[J]. Zhongguo Yaoxue Zazhi, 2021, 56: 1785-1790.
    [10] Thokala P, Devlin N, Marsh K, et al. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force[J]. Value Health, 2016, 19: 1-13. doi:  10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003
    [11] Marsh K, IJzerman M, Thokala P, et al. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force[J]. Value Health, 2016, 19: 125-137. doi:  10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.016
    [12] Vandewalle B, Amorim M, Ramos D, et al. Value-based decision-making for orphan drugs with multiple criteria decision analysis: burosumab for the treatment of X-linked hypophosphatemia[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2021, 37: 1021-1030. doi:  10.1080/03007995.2021.1904861
    [13] Gilabert-Perramon A, Torrent-Farnell J, Catalan A, et al. Drug Evaluation And Decision Making In Catalonia: Development And Validation Of A Methodological Framework Based On Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (Mcda) For Orphan Drugs[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2017, 33: 111-120.
    [14] Malinowski KP, Kawalec P, Trąbka W, et al. Reimbursement Legislations and Decision Making for Orphan Drugs in Central and Eastern European Countries[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2019, 8: 10: 487.
    [15] Radu CP, Chiriac ND, Pravat AM. The Development of the Romanian Scorecard HTA System[J]. Value Health Reg Issues, 2016, 10: 41-47. doi:  10.1016/j.vhri.2016.07.006
    [16] Simoens S. Health technologies for rare diseases: does conventional HTA still apply?[J]. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 2014, 14: 315-317. doi:  10.1586/14737167.2014.906903
    [17] Sussex J, Rollet P, Garau M, et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Value Orphan Medicines[EB/OL]. (2013-05-01)[2022-01-09]. https://www.ohe.org/publications/multi-criteria-decision-analysis-value-orphan-medicines.
    [18] Sussex J, Rollet P, Garau M, et al. A pilot study of multicriteria decision analysis for valuing orphan medicines[J]. Value Health, 2013, 16: 1163-1169. doi:  10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.002
    [19] Kolasa K, Zwolinski KM, Kalo Z, et al. Potential impact of the implementation of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) on the Polish pricing and reimbursement process of orphan drugs[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2016, 11: 23. doi:  10.1186/s13023-016-0388-0
    [20] Serpik VG, Yagudina RI. Pathways of Implementation of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Into Orphan Drug Approval Procedure for Drug Supply Programs in Russian Federation[J]. Value Health, 2014, 17: A587.
    [21] Summary of research report of food and Drug Safety Department (Annual Report of the year 2017) vol. 21[EB/OL]. (2018-04-02)[2021-12-25]. http://www.nifds.go.kr/brd/m_347/view.do?seq=12078.
    [22] 何伟, 孙利华, 王秭萱, 等. 多准则决策分析用于国内外医疗保险报销项目评估情况分析[J]. 中国药物经济学, 2016, 11: 31-33, 49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYWA201605012.htm

    He W, Sun LH, Wang ZX, et al. Analysis of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to the Evaluation of Medical Insurance Reimbursement Projects at Home and Abroad[J]. Zhongguo Yaowu Jingjixue, 2016, 11: 31-33, 49. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYWA201605012.htm
    [23] 黄倩倩, 王涛, 康琪, 等. 多准则决策分析在药物效益风险评价领域的应用研究进展[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2021, 30: 2069-2074. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2021.22.010

    Huang QQ, Wang T, Kang Q, et al. Research progress in application of multi-criteria decision analysis in the field of drug benefit-risk assessment[J]. Zhongguo Xinyao Zazhi, 2021, 30: 2069-2074. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1003-3734.2021.22.010
    [24] 王琳, 李青. 采用多准则决策分析模型评价不同剂量沃替西汀治疗重度抑郁症的效益与风险[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2020, 29: 77-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLX202002001.htm

    Wang L, Li Q. Evaluation of the Benefit-risk of Different Doses of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Major Depression Using a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Model[J]. Yaowu Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 2020, 29: 77-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLX202002001.htm
    [25] 熊玮仪, 董铎. 基于多准则决策分析模型的药品获益风险评价方法[J]. 中国药物警戒, 2017, 14: 752-754. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1672-8629.2017.12.010

    Xiong WY, Dong D. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis-Based Methodologies for Pharmaceutical Product Risk-Benefit Assessment[J]. Zhongguo Yaowu Jingjie, 2017, 14: 752-754. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1672-8629.2017.12.010
    [26] 胡善联, 何江江, 杨燕, 等. 多维度决策分析在血友病预防性治疗中的应用[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2017, 36: 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WEIJ201709019.htm

    Hu SL, H JJ, Yang Y, et al. Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Prophylactic Therapy on Hemophilia A in China[J]. Zhongguo Weisheng Jingji, 2017, 36: 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WEIJ201709019.htm
    [27] 胡善联, 杨燕, 何江江, 等. 罕见病孤儿药遴选标准的多维决策分析[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2018, 37: 67-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WEIJ201803026.htm

    Hu SL, Yang Y, He JJ. The Selective Conditions of Orphan Drugs by Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in China[J]. Zhongguo Weisheng Jingji, 2018, 37: 67-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WEIJ201803026.htm
    [28] 徐菲, 唐密, 胡善联, 等. 多准则决策分析应用于卫生决策的假设基础与基本操作[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2020, 23: 332-336. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2020.04.005

    Xu F, Tang M, Hu SL, et al. Assumption foundation and key steps of multi-criteria decision analysis applied to healthcare decision-making[J]. Zhongguo Weisheng Ziyuan, 2020, 23: 332-336. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2020.04.005
    [29] 唐密, 杨燕, 胡善联, 等. 多准则决策分析应用于卫生决策的理论基础与进展[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2020, 23: 326-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSZY202004006.htm

    Tang M, Yang Y, Hu SL, et al. Theoretical basis and progress of multi-criteria decision analysis in healthcare decision-making[J]. Zhongguo Weisheng Ziyuan, 2020, 23: 326-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSZY202004006.htm
    [30] 鲍海妮, 余小兰, 耿劲松. 医药卫生领域多准则决策分析的方法学[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2020, 23: 337-341, 372. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2020.04.006

    Bao HN, Yu XL, Geng JS. Methodological investigation into multi-criteria decision analysis of healthcare[J]. Zhongguo Weisheng Ziyuan, 2020, 23: 337-341, 372. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2020.04.006
    [31] Zelei T, Mendola ND, Elezbawy B, et al. Criteria and Scoring Functions Used in Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Value Frameworks for the Assessment of Rare Disease Therapies: A Systematic Literature Review[J]. Pharmacoecon Open, 2021, 5: 605-612. doi:  10.1007/s41669-021-00271-w
    [32] Baran-Kooiker A, Czech M, Kooiker C. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Models in Health Technology Assessment of Orphan Drugs-a Systematic Literature Review. Next Steps in Methodology Development?[J]. Front Public Health, 2018, 6: 287. doi:  10.3389/fpubh.2018.00287
    [33] de Andrés-Nogales F, Cruz E, Calleja MA, et al. A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for the reimbursement of orphan drugs (FinMHU-MCDA study)[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2021, 16: 186. doi:  10.1186/s13023-021-01809-1
    [34] Schey C, Postma MJ, Krabbe PFM, et al. Assessing the Preferences for Criteria in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Treatments for Rare Diseases[J]. Front Public Health, 2020, 8: 162. doi:  10.3389/fpubh.2020.00162
    [35] Guarga L, Badia X, Obach M, et al. Implementing reflective multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to assess orphan drugs value in the Catalan Health Service (CatSalut)[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2019, 14: 157. doi:  10.1186/s13023-019-1121-6
    [36] Vermersch P, Martinelli V, Pfleger C, et al. Benefit-risk Assessment of Cladribine Using Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis[J]. Clin Ther, 2019, 41: 249-260 e18. doi:  10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.12.015
    [37] Roldán UB, Badia X, Marcos-Rodriguez JA, et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis as a Decision-Support Tool for Drug Evaluation: A Pilot Study in a Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Setting[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2018, 34: 519-526. doi:  10.1017/S0266462318000569
    [38] Kolasa K, Zwolinski KM, Zah V, et al. Revealed preferences towards the appraisal of orphan drugs in Poland-multi criteria decision analysis[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2018, 13: 67. doi:  10.1186/s13023-018-0803-9
    [39] Jiménez A, Ais A, Beaudet A, et al. Determining the value contribution of selexipag for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in Spain using reflective multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2018, 13: 220. doi:  10.1186/s13023-018-0966-4
    [40] Garau M, Hampson G, Devlin N, et al. Applying a Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Approach to Elicit Stakeholders' Preferences in Italy: The Case of Obinutu-zumab for Rituximab-Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)[J]. Pharmacoecon Open, 2018, 2: 153-163. doi:  10.1007/s41669-017-0048-x
    [41] Wagner M, Khoury H, Bennetts L, et al. Appraising the holistic value of Lenvatinib for radio-iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: A multi-country study applying pragmatic MCDA[J]. BMC Cancer, 2017, 17: 272. doi:  10.1186/s12885-017-3258-9
    [42] Annemans L, Aymé S, Le Cam Y, et al. Recommendations from the European Working Group for Value Assessment and Funding Processes in Rare Diseases (ORPH-VAL)[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2017, 12: 50. doi:  10.1186/s13023-017-0601-9
    [43] Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Samaha D, et al. Exploring Values of Health Technology Assessment Agencies Using Reflective Multicriteria and Rare Disease Case[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2017, 33: 504-520. doi:  10.1017/S0266462317000915
    [44] Piniazhko O, Zalis'ka O, Brezden O. Methodological issues in MCDA for training needed: eliciting stakeholders' value preferences in preferences in Ukraine[J]. Value Health, 2017, 2017: A4520.
    [45] Iskrov G, Miteva-Katrandzhieva T, Stefanov R. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs[J]. Front Public Health, 2016, 4: 214.
    [46] Wagner M, Khoury H, Willet, J, et al. Can the EVIDEM Framework Tackle Issues Raised by Evaluating Treatments for Rare Diseases: Analysis of Issues and Policies, and Context-Specific Adaptation[J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2016, 34: 285-301. doi:  10.1007/s40273-015-0340-5
    [47] Fedyaeva V, Omelyanovskiy V, Rebrova O, et al. Comparison of Methods to Assess the Relative Importance of Criteria in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An Evaluation of Orphan Drugs in Russia[J]. Value Health, 2016, 19: A596.
    [48] Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, O'Neil B. Can holistic MCDA tackle issues raised by evaluating treatments for rare diseases: an exploration from the HTA perspective[J]. Value Health, 2016, 19: A88-A89.
    [49] Schey C, Connolly M. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): Testing a Proposed Mcda Model for Orphan Drugs[J]. Value Health, 2014, 17: A556.
    [50] Trip AM, Tsiachristas A, Koenders JM, et al. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Reimbursing Orphan Drugs: A Dutch Demonstration Study Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method[J]. Value Health, 2014, 17: A541-A542.
    [51] Fedyaeva VK, Omelyanovsky VV, Rebrova O, et al. MCDA Approach To Ranking Rare Diseases In Russia: Preliminary Results[J]. Value Health, 2014, 17: A539.
    [52] Wahlster P, Goetghebeur M, Kriza C, et al. National Leading-Edge Cluster Medical Technologies 'Medical Valley EMN'. Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2015, 15: 262. doi:  10.1186/s12913-015-0930-0
    [53] Hsu JC, Hsieh CY, Yang YH, et al. Net clinical benefit of oral anticoagulants: a multiple criteria decision analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10: e0124806. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0124806
    [54] Tromp N, Prawiranegara R, Siregar A, et al. Importance Of Multiple Criteria For Priority Setting Of HIV/AIDS Interventions[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2015, 31: 390-398. doi:  10.1017/S0266462316000039
    [55] Simoens S. Market access of orphan drugs and the role of multi-criteria decision making[J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2012, 7: A26. doi:  10.1186/1750-1172-7-S2-A26
    • Relative Articles(0)
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(7)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (959) PDF downloads(183) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    Links: National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences(CAMS) AMLC Check CNKI Database CNKI Term Online Chinese General Practice
    Address：Room 302,Third Floor,Building 7, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China
    Tel：010-69154261/4262
    E - mail：medj@pumch.cn
    mjpumch@126.com
    Copyright of website：Editorial Office of Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return