留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

痫性发作监测技术新进展

朱昊月 付玉姣 肖波

朱昊月, 付玉姣, 肖波. 痫性发作监测技术新进展[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2020, 11(3): 301-304. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20190068
引用本文: 朱昊月, 付玉姣, 肖波. 痫性发作监测技术新进展[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2020, 11(3): 301-304. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20190068
Hao-yue ZHU, Yu-jiao FU, Bo XIAO. Development in the Seizure-detection Technique[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(3): 301-304. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20190068
Citation: Hao-yue ZHU, Yu-jiao FU, Bo XIAO. Development in the Seizure-detection Technique[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2020, 11(3): 301-304. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20190068

痫性发作监测技术新进展

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.20190068
基金项目: 

国家科技重大研究专项 2016YFC0904400

国家自然科学基金 81701182

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    肖波 电话:0731-84327236,E-mail:xiaobo_xy@126.com

  • 中图分类号: R742.1

Development in the Seizure-detection Technique

More Information
  • 摘要: 准确监测痫性发作对于有效评估癫痫患者口服抗癫痫药的临床疗效,以及获取可靠的临床研究数据具有重要意义。然而,临床工作中患者本人记录的痫性发作频率远低于脑电图监测的频率,因此研发准确便携的长程脑电图监测新技术尤为迫切。本文对痫性发作监测技术的最新进展作一综述。
    利益冲突  无
  • 表  1  不同癫痫发作监测技术的优势与劣势

    监测技术 优势 劣势
    经颅监测 •脑电图是最重要的癫痫监测手段,可进行长程动态监测 •颅内植入电极为有创操作
    •可监测到无或仅有轻微运动情况的癫痫发作,准确可靠 •尚无法准确进行自动数据分析
    •可见的电极导致癫痫患者被歧视
    运动监测 •不依赖于脑电图进行监测 •对非惊厥性痫性发作的监测效果欠佳
    •可有效监测惊厥性痫性发作 •基于摄像的监测设备无法脱离家庭环境
    •可有效监测夜间痫性发作
    自主神经症状监测 •可持续监测患者心率、血压以及血氧饱和度,进而实现对痫性发作的自动监测 •无法区别日常生活中的兴奋、恐惧等情绪变化
    行为学监测 •一些癫痫手机软件可提供痫性发作报警功能 •报警功能需主动按下紧急呼叫按钮,大多数患者无法完
    成,仍需进一步改进
    •患者可通过其记录癫痫发作情况
    多模式监测 •对全面性强直痉挛发作及部分性发作监测的灵敏度高 •对非惊厥性痫性发作的监测较为困难
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Fisher RS, van Emde BW, Blume W, et al. Epileptic seizures and epilepsy:definitions proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE)[J]. Epilepsia, 2005, 46:470-472. doi:  10.1111/j.0013-9580.2005.66104.x
    [2] 肖波,周罗. 癫痫最新临床诊疗指南:机遇与挑战并存[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2017, 8:122-126. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XHYX2017Z1009.htm
    [3] Beghi E. Addressing the burden of epilepsy:Many unmet needs[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2016, 107:79-84. doi:  10.1016/j.phrs.2016.03.003
    [4] Schmidt D, Schachter SC.Drug treatment of epilepsy in adults[J]. BMJ, 2014, 348:g254. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/reference/PMED?id=24583319
    [5] Van de Vel A, Milosevic M, Bonroy B, et al. Long-term accelerometry-triggered video monitoring and detection of tonic-clonic and clonic seizures in a home environment:Pilot study[J]. Epilepsy Behav Case Rep, 2016, 5:66-71. doi:  10.1016/j.ebcr.2016.03.005
    [6] Fisher RS, Blum DE, Diventura B, et al. Seizure diaries for clinical research and practice:limitations and future prospects[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2012, 24:304-310. doi:  10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.04.128
    [7] Blum DE, Eskola J, Bortz JJ, et al. Patient awareness of seizures[J]. Neurology, 1996, 47:260-264. doi:  10.1212/WNL.47.1.260
    [8] Cook MJ, O'Brien TJ, Berkovic SF, et al. Prediction of seizure likelihood with a long-term, implanted seizure advisory system in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy:a first-in-man study[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12:563-571. doi:  10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70075-9
    [9] Hamandi K, Beniczky S, Diehl B, et al. Current practice and recommendations in UK epilepsy monitoring units. Report of a national survey and workshop[J]. Seizure, 2017, 50:92-98. doi:  10.1016/j.seizure.2017.06.015
    [10] 卢强,金丽日,周祥琴,等. 额叶非惊厥性癫痫持续状态临床和脑电图特征[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2012, 3:318-322. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xhyx201203016
    [11] Hoppe C, Poepel A, Elger CE. Epilepsy:accuracy of patient seizure counts[J]. Arch Neurol, 2007, 64:1595-1599. doi:  10.1001/archneur.64.11.1595
    [12] Elger CE, Mormann F. Seizure prediction and documentation-two important problems[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2013, 12:531-532. doi:  10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70092-9
    [13] Detyniecki K, Blumenfeld H. Consciousness of seizures and consciousness during seizures:are they related?[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2014, 30:6-9. doi:  10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.09.018
    [14] Debener S, Emkes R, De Vos M, et al. Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear[J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5:16743. doi:  10.1038/srep16743
    [15] Zibrandtsen IC, Kidmose P, Christensen CB, et al. Ear-EEG detects ictal and interictal abnormalities in focal and generalized epilepsy-A comparison with scalp EEG monitor-ing[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2017, 128:2454-2461. doi:  10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.115
    [16] Gu Y, Cleeren E, Dan J, et al. Comparison between Scalp EEG and Behind-the-Ear EEG for Development of a Wearable Seizure Detection System for Patients with Focal Epilepsy[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2017, 18:29. doi:  10.3390/s18010029
    [17] Grant AC, Abdel-Baki SG, Omurtag A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of microEEG:a miniature, wireless EEG device[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2014, 34:81-85. doi:  10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.03.015
    [18] Tewolde S, Oommen K, Lie DY, et al. Epileptic Seizure Detection and Prediction Based on Continuous Cerebral Blood Flow Monitoring-a Review[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2015, 6:159-178. doi:  10.1260/2040-2295.6.2.159
    [19] Jeppesen J, Beniczky S, Johansen P, et al. Exploring the capability of wireless near infrared spectroscopy as a portable seizure detection device for epilepsy patients[J]. Seizure, 2015, 26:43-48. doi:  10.1016/j.seizure.2015.01.015
    [20] Baldassano SN, Brinkmann BH, Ung H, et al. Crowdsourc-ing seizure detection:algorithm development and validation on human implanted device recordings[J]. Brain, 2017, 140:1680-1691. doi:  10.1093/brain/awx098
    [21] Kandler R, Ponnusamy A, Wragg C. Video ambulatory EEG:A good alternative to inpatient video telemetry?[J]. Seizure, 2017, 47:66-70. doi:  10.1016/j.seizure.2017.02.010
    [22] Van de Vel A, Smets K, Wouters K, et al. Automated non-EEG based seizure detection:Do users have a say?[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2016, 62:121-128. doi:  10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.06.029
    [23] Pediaditis M, Tsiknakis M, Leitgeb N. Vision-based motion detection, analysis and recognition of epileptic seizures-a systematic review[J]. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2012, 108:1133-1148. doi:  10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.08.005
    [24] Beniczky S, Polster T, Kjaer TW, et al. Detection of generalized tonic-clonic seizures by a wireless wrist accelerometer:a prospective, multicenter study[J]. Epilepsia, 2013, 54:e58-e61. doi:  10.1111/epi.12120
    [25] Szabo CA, Morgan LC, Karkar KM, et al. Electromyography-based seizure detector:Preliminary results comparing a generalized tonic-clonic seizure detection algorithm to video-EEG recordings[J]. Epilepsia, 2015, 56:1432-1437. doi:  10.1111/epi.13083
    [26] Beniczky S, Conradsen I, Moldovan M, et al. Quantitative analysis of surface electromyography during epileptic and nonepileptic convulsive seizures[J]. Epilepsia, 2014, 55:1128-1134. doi:  10.1111/epi.12669
    [27] Hampel KG, Jahanbekam A, Elger CE, et al. Seizure-related modulation of systemic arterial blood pressure in focal epilepsy[J]. Epilepsia, 2016, 57:1709-1718. doi:  10.1111/epi.13504
    [28] Thomas SS, Nathan V, Zong C, et al. BioWatch:A Noninvasive Wrist-Based Blood Pressure Monitor That Incorporates Training Techniques for Posture and Subject Variability[J]. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2016, 20:1291-1300. doi:  10.1109/JBHI.2015.2458779
    [29] Fisher RS, Bartfeld E, Cramer JA. Use of an online epilepsy diary to characterize repetitive seizures[J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2015, 47:66-71. doi:  10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.022
    [30] Furbass F, Kampusch S, Kaniusas E, et al. Automatic multimodal detection for long-term seizure documentation in epilepsy[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2017, 128:1466-1472. doi:  10.1016/j.clinph.2017.05.013
  • 加载中
表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  467
  • HTML全文浏览量:  40
  • PDF下载量:  119
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-04-09
  • 刊出日期:  2020-05-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    【温馨提醒】近日,《协和医学杂志》编辑部接到作者反映,有多名不法人员冒充期刊编辑发送见刊通知,鼓动作者添加微信,从而骗取版面费的行为。特提醒您,本刊与作者联系的方式均为邮件通知或电话,稿件进度通知邮箱为:mjpumch@126.com,编辑部电话为:010-69154261,请提高警惕,谨防上当受骗!如有任何疑问,请致电编辑部核实。谢谢!