-
摘要:
目的 分析病理性乳头溢液患者的临床、病理特点及其随诊情况, 以期为临床诊治提供依据。 方法 回顾性收集北京协和医院2015年1月至12月间住院治疗的病理性乳头溢液患者的临床、病理及术后随访资料, 根据乳头溢液的性质将患者分为血性溢液组和非血性溢液组, 比较两组患者的临床、病理特点。 结果 173例符合纳入和排除标准的女性患者入选本研究, 平均年龄(45.65±13.48)岁, 中位病程3(1, 12)个月, 其中血性溢液119例(68.8%, 119/173), 非血性浆液性溢液54例(31.2%, 54/173);术前111例(64.2%, 111/173)经超声检查发现存在病变。血性溢液组和非血性溢液组在年龄、病程、术前体格和钼靶检查结果、术后病理分型等方面差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);在术前超声检查(是否发现病变)及术后病理诊断(是否为乳腺癌)方面差异存在统计学意义(P=0.012和P=0.045)。血性溢液患者中恶性病变组的年龄更大(P=0.014)。术后中位随访17(14, 20)个月, 病理诊断为乳腺癌的患者均无复发、转移及死亡。 结论 血性溢液提示高乳腺恶性病变风险, 其中年龄较大者乳腺癌风险更高。大部分乳头溢液患者, 特别是血性溢液患者术前超声检查可发现病变。手术治疗是明确诊断并进行治疗的有效手段, 术后预后较好。 Abstract:Objective The clinical and pathological features and the follow-ups of 173 patients with pathological nipple discharge were analyzed to provide the basis for diagnosis and treatment. Methods We reviewed the data of the patients who suffered from pathological nipple discharge and as well underwent surgery in Peking Union Medical College Hospital from Jan to Dec 2015. According to the characteristics of nipple discharge, the patients were divided into groups of hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic nipple discharge. We compared the clinical and pathological characteristics between the two groups. Results A total of 173 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study, all of whom were female, with an average age of (45.65±13.48)years and a median course of disease of 3(1, 12)months. Among them, 119 patients (68.8%, 119/173) had hemorrhagic discharge; 54 patients (31.2%, 54/173) had non-hemorrhagic serous discharge. 111 patients (64.2%, 111/173) had lesions detected by ultrasound before surgery. Therewas no significant difference in age, course of the disease, preoperative physical condition, molybdenum target examination results, and the postoperative pathological classification between the two groups (all P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in preoperative ultrasound examination (whether lesions were found) and postoperative pathological diagnosis (whether breast cancer was found) (P=0.012 and P=0.045). The age of the malignant lesion group was older in patients with hemorrhagic discharge (P=0.014). After a median follow-up of 17 (14, 20) months, none of the patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer had a recurrence, metastasis, or deceased. Conclusions Hemorrhagic nipple discharge showed a higher risk of breast cancer, especially for elder patients. Ultrasound revealed more lumps than physical examination and mammography. Since the examinations can not identify the malignant lesions out of the symptoms of nipple discharge, surgery is always needed and the postoperative prognosis is quite good. 利益冲突 无 -
表 1 血性溢液和非血性溢液患者临床/病理特点比较
临床/病理特征 血性溢液
(n=119)非血性溢液
(n=54)P值 年龄(x±s,岁) 45.65±14.43 44.85±9.81 0.793 是否多孔[n(%)] 1.000 否 117(98.3) 54(100) 是 2(1.7) 0(0) 是否双侧[n(%)] 0.953 否 115(96.6) 53(98.1) 是 4(3.4) 1(0.19) 病程[M(Q), 月] 3(1,12) 5(1,12) 0.103 术前是否触及肿块[n(%)] 0.173 是 13(10.9) 10(18.5) 否 106(89.1) 44(81.5) 超声是否合并肿块[n(%)] 0.012 是 69(58.0) 42(77.8) 否 50(42.0) 12(22.2) 钼靶是否合并肿块或钙化[n(%)] 0.661 是 23(19.3) 12(22.2) 否 96(80.7) 42(77.8) 术后病理[n(%)] 0.045 乳腺癌 23(19.3) 4(7.4) 非恶性病变 96(80.7) 50(92.6) 病理分型[n(%)] 0.445 浸润性癌 6(5.0) 0(0) 导管内癌 15(12.6) 4(7.4) 其他类型癌 2(1.7) 0(0) 不典型增生 11(9.2) 4(7.4) 导管内乳头状瘤 59(49.6) 33(61.1) 乳腺腺病 13(10.9) 8(14.8) 纤维腺瘤 2(1.7) 2(3.7) 导管扩张 11(9.2) 3(5.6) 随访时间(x±s,月) 16.78±3.53 16.54±3.04 0.661 表 2 血性溢液患者中良恶性病变组临床资料比较
临床特征 乳腺癌
(n=23)良性病变
(n=96)P值 年龄(x±s,岁) 54.04±18.57 43.64±12.56 0.014 是否多孔[n(%)] 1.000 否 23(100) 94(97.9) 是 0(0) 2(2.1) 是否双侧[n(%)] 0.582 否 22(75.7) 93(96.9) 是 1(4.3) 3(3.1) 病程[M(Q),月] 2(1, 7) 3(1, 12) 0.371 术前是否触及肿块[n(%)] 1.000 是 3(13.0) 10(10.4) 否 20(87.0) 86(89.6) 超声是否合并肿块[n(%)] 0.210 是 16(69.6) 53(55.2) 否 7(30.4) 43(44.8) 钼靶是否合并肿块或钙化[n(%)] 0.227 是 7(30.4) 16(16.7) 否 16(69.6) 80(83.3) 随访时间(x±s,月) 17.48±3.72 16.61±3.48 0.294 -
[1] Tang SS, Twelves DJ, Isacke CM, et al.Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease[J].Surg Endosc, 2011, 25:1712-1722. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1465-4 [2] Park CJ, Kim EK, Moon HJ, et al.Reliability of breast ultrasound BI-RADS final assessment in mammographically negative patients with nipple discharge and radiologic predictors of malignancy[J].J Breast Cancer, 2016, 19:308-315. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.308 [3] Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, et al.WHO classification of tumours of the breast. World Health Organization classification of tumours[M].4th ed.Lyon:IARC Press, 2012. [4] Chen L, Zhou WB, Zhao Y, et al.Bloody nipple discharge is a predictor of breast cancer risk:a meta-analysis[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2012, 132:9-14. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1787-5 [5] Zervoudis S, Iatrakis G, Economides P, et al. Nipple discharge screening[J]. Womens Health(Lond Engl), 2010, 6:135-151. doi: 10.2217/WHE.09.81 [6] 王富文, 林燕苹, 何萍青.106例病理性乳头溢液(PND)临床分析[J].复旦学报, 2013, 40:714-717. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=shykdxxb201306015 [7] Morrogh M, Park A, Elkin EB, et al. Lessons learned from 416 cases of nipple discharge of the breast[J]. Am J Surg, 2010, 200:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.021 [8] Lippa N, Hurtevent-Labrot G, Ferron S, et al.Nipple discharge:The role of imaging[J].Diagn Interv Imaging, 2015, 96:1017-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.07.004 [9] Ouldamer L, Kellal I, Legendre G, et al.Management of breast nipple discharge[J].J Gynecol Obstet Blol Reprod, 2015, 44:927-937. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.035 [10] Sabel MS.Helvie MA, Breslin T, et al.Is duct excision still necessary for all cases of suspicious nipple discharge?[J].Breast J, 2013, 18:157-162. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=b3a08a8c387662c4cf87df6deb8a2ebc&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [11] Teboul M.A new concept in breast investigation:echo-histological acino-ductal analysis or analytic echography[J].Biomed Pharmacother, 1988, 42:289-295. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=a58d04b23426d815b3ad90230a0c52ea&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [12] Dooley WC.Routine operative breast endoscopy for bloody nipple discharge[J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2002, 9:920-923. doi: 10.1007/BF02557531 [13] 徐海滨, 苏昆仑, 胡祖健, 等.乳头血性溢液的临床病理特点及治疗[J].实用肿瘤杂志, 2008, 23:155-157. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SYZZ200802026.htm [14] Fisher CS, Margenthaler JA.A look into the ductoscope:its role in pathologic nipple discharge[J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18:3187-3191. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1962-2 [15] Tang SS, Twelves DJ, Isacke CM, et al.Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breat disease[J].Surg Endosc, 2011, 25:1712-1722. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1465-4 [16] Lee H, Li JY, Fan JH, et al.Risk factors for Breast Cancer Among Chinese Women:A 10-year NationWide Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study[J].J Epidemil, 2014, 24:67-76. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20120217