-
摘要: 近年来,腹腔镜微创手术在早期宫颈癌中被广泛应用。既往回顾性研究显示,微创手术具有术中出血少、住院时间短、术后恢复快的优点,同时总生存期与传统开腹手术无差别。但N Engl J Med在2018年10月30日刊登的一项前瞻性多中心随机对照临床试验和一项回顾性流行病学研究结果均显示,微创手术增加了早期宫颈癌的死亡率。这两项研究结果虽不能完全否定腹腔镜在早期宫颈癌治疗中的作用,但应引起术者的重视与反思:规范化的肿瘤治疗原则是基础,手术路径的选择应以患者、疾病和术者技术特点为依据。Abstract: In recent years, minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery has been widely used in early-stage cervical cancer. Previous retrospective studies have shown that minimally invasive surgery is associated with less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter length of hospital stay, and a lower risk of postoperative complications than the abdominal approach, and yet does not affect survival. But a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial and a retrospective epidemiological study, which were published in the New England Journal of Medicine on October 30, 2018, showed that minimally invasive surgery in patients with cervical cancer was associated with a higher rate of recurrence and a lower rate of disease-free survival. We can't completely negate the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of cervical cancer. But these results cause our attention and reflection. The choice of the surgical path depends on the characteristics of the patient, disease and personal technology.利益冲突 无
-
[1] Dargent D, Mathevet P.Radical laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod(Paris), 1992, 21:709-710. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1430921 [2] Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1992, 166:864-865. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91351-A [3] Childers JM, Hatch KD, Tran AN, et al. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 82:741-747. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8414319 [4] Querleu D.LeBlanc E. Laparoscopic infrarenal paraaortic lymph node dissection for restaging of carcinoma of the ovary or fallopian tube[J]. Cancer, 1994, 73:1467-1471. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940301)73:5<1467::AID-CNCR2820730524>3.0.CO;2-B [5] Naik R, Jackson KS, Lopes A, et al. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised phase Ⅱ trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements[J]. BJOG, 2010, 117:746-751. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02479.x [6] Arimoto T, Kawana K, Adachi K, et al. Minimization of curative surgery for treatment of early cervical cancer: a review[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2015, 45:611-616. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv048 [7] Nam JH, Park JY, Kim DY, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study[J]. Ann Oncol, 2012, 23:903-911. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr360 [8] 向阳.腹腔镜在妇科肿瘤手术治疗中的应用历史与现状[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2015, 50:890-893. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2015.12.003 [9] Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379:1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395 [10] Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, et al. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379:1905-1914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923 [11] Volz J, Koster S, Spacek Z, et al. The influence of pneumoperitoneum used in laparoscopic surgery on an intraabdominal tumor growth[J]. Cancer, 1999, 86:770-774. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990901)86:5<770::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-3 [12] Lin F, Pan L, Li L, et al. Effects of a simulated CO2pneumoperitoneum environment on the proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis of cervical cancer cells in vitro[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2014, 20:2497-2503. doi: 10.12659/MSM.891179 [13] Kong TW, Chang SJ, Piao X, et al. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2016, 42:77-86. doi: 10.1111/jog.12840
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 446
- HTML全文浏览量: 53
- PDF下载量: 168
- 被引次数: 0