邮件订阅 RSS

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

中国女性乳腺癌筛查现状及适宜模式探索

沈松杰,  孙强

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 协和医学杂志  > 2018 >  9(4): 298-302
沈松杰, 孙强. 中国女性乳腺癌筛查现状及适宜模式探索[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2018, 9(4): 298-302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.04.003
引用本文: 沈松杰, 孙强. 中国女性乳腺癌筛查现状及适宜模式探索[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2018, 9(4): 298-302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.04.003
shu
Song-jie SHEN, Qiang SUN. Current Status and Suitable Mode Evaluation of Breast Carcinoma Screening in Chinese Women[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2018, 9(4): 298-302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.04.003
Citation: Song-jie SHEN, Qiang SUN. Current Status and Suitable Mode Evaluation of Breast Carcinoma Screening in Chinese Women[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2018, 9(4): 298-302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.04.003
shu

中国女性乳腺癌筛查现状及适宜模式探索

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.04.003

  • 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院乳腺外科, 北京 100730

基金项目: 

国家科技支撑计划 2016YFC1302601

国家科技支撑计划 2014BAI08B03

国家科技支撑计划 2006BAI02A09

北京市科学技术委员会重大专项科技计划 D161100000816005

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    孙强 电话:010-69152700,E-mail:sunqiangpumc@sina.com

  • 中图分类号: R737.9;R-1

Current Status and Suitable Mode Evaluation of Breast Carcinoma Screening in Chinese Women

  • Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences ＆ Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

More Information

    摘要
  • 摘要: 乳腺癌已成为中国女性最常见的恶性肿瘤, 但目前尚无规范的筛查标准和流程。欧美国家普遍采用以乳腺X线摄影为主要手段的乳腺癌普查模式, 但中国经济发展水平和女性的乳腺癌发病特点与欧美国家存在较大差别, 故其筛查模式并不适合中国。结合当前现有的针对中国女性乳腺癌筛查模式的研究和实践提示, 先采用乳腺癌风险模型进行评估, 对高危女性首选查体联合超声进行筛查, 成本效益较高, 且可提高早期诊断率, 是更适宜中国女性的乳腺癌筛查模式。
    Abstract: Though breast carcinoma has become the most common malignancy in Chinese women, there are no standardized screening methods and modes of breast carcinoma. In western countries, mammography is the standard imaging for breast carcinoma screening. The western mode of breast carcinoma screening is not suitable for Chinese women, since there are many differences in the characteristics of breast carcinoma and economic status between China and western countries. Previous studies and practices have implied that the suitable screening mode for Chinese women is to screen the high-risk women by physical examination and ultrasound after evaluating the risk of breast carcinoma for individuals, which is more cost-effective and can improve early detection rate.
    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(35)
  • [1] 王启俊, 祝伟星, 邢秀梅.北京城区女性乳腺癌发病死亡和生存情况20年监测分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志, 2006, 28:208-210. doi:  10.3760/j.issn:0253-3766.2006.03.012
    [2] Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66:115-132. doi:  10.3322/caac.21338
    [3] Independent UKPoBCS. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review[J]. Lancet, 2012, 380:1778-1786. doi:  10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0
    [4] Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2002, 137:347-360. doi:  10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_Part_1-200209030-00012
    [5] 徐光炜, 胡永昇, 阚秀.中国10万妇女乳腺癌筛查初探[J].中国肿瘤临床, 2010, 19:565-568. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgzl201009002
    [6] 唐利立, 廖妮, 肖萤, 等.高频B超在中国妇女致密型乳腺的乳腺癌筛查中的应用[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2006, 15:732-735. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1005-6947.2006.10.004
    [7] 康敏, 庞铁, 李佳圆, 等.钼靶X线在亚洲女性乳腺癌筛查中的准确性评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志, 2010, 32:212-216. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zhzl201003012
    [8] 许娟, 王颀, 马宏民, 等.体检联合超声补充X射线钼靶检查乳腺癌筛查模式初步应用评价[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2013, 20:1295-1299. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1673-5269.2013.17.002
    [9] 余海云, 李文萍, 王颀, 等.城市群体妇女2006-2011年乳腺癌筛查效果评估[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2013, 20:894-897. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=qlzlzz201312004
    [10] 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2017年版)[J].中国癌症杂志, 2017, 27:695-759. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=ZGAZ201709004
    [11] 徐雅莉, 孙强, 单广良, 等.中国女性乳腺癌发病相关危险因素:病例对照研究[J].协和医学杂志, 2011, 1:7-14. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2011.01.002
    [12] Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, Di Nitto PA, et al. Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996, 167:1261-1265. doi:  10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911192
    [13] Zulfiqar M, Rohazly I, Rahmah M. Do the majority of malaysian women have dense breasts on mammogram?[J]. Biomed Imaging Interv J, 2011, 7:e14. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=85723844&site=ehost-live
    [14] Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: compar-ison of interval-and screen-detected cancers[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92:1081-1087. doi:  10.1093/jnci/92.13.1081
    [15] Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, et al. Breast cancer in china[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15:e279-e289. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/reference/PMED?id=24872111
    [16] Li J, Zhang BN, Fan JH, et al. A nation-wide multicenter 10-year (1999-2008) retrospective clinical epidemiological study of female breast cancer in China[J]. BMC Cancer, 2011, 11:364. doi:  10.1186/1471-2407-11-364
    [17] Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel FR, et al. The relationship of mammographic density and age: Implications for breast cancer screening[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 198:W292-W295. http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/external-ref?access_num=10.2214/AJR.10.6049&link_type=DOI
    [18] 沈松杰, 孙强, 徐雅莉, 等.乳腺癌常用早期诊断方法的比较研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志, 2012, 34:877-880. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.11.018
    [19] Wang X, Huang Y, Li L, et al. Assessment of performance of the gail model for predicting breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2018, 20:18. doi:  10.1186/s13058-018-0947-5
    [20] Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, et al. Breast-cancer screening—viewpoint of the iarc working group[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372:2353-2358. doi:  10.1056/NEJMsr1504363
    [21] Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, et al. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the american cancer society[J]. JAMA, 2015, 314:1599-1614. doi:  10.1001/jama.2015.12783
    [22] Siu AL, Force USPST. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2016, 164:279-296. doi:  10.1007/s40615-014-0051-1
    [23] Badgwell BD, Giordano SH, Duan ZZ, et al. Mammography before diagnosis among women age 80 years and older with breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26:2482-2488. doi:  10.1200/JCO.2007.12.8058
    [24] Mandelblatt JS, Silliman R. Hanging in the balance: making decisions about the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening among the oldest old without a safety net of scientific evidence[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27:487-490. doi:  10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4928
    [25] van Dijck J, Verbeek A, Hendriks J, et al. Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the nijmegen programme[J]. Br J Cancer, 1996, 74:1838-1842. doi:  10.1038/bjc.1996.640
    [26] Bevers TB. Breast awareness: a shift in the paradigm of breast self-examination[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2009, 7:1042-1043. doi:  10.6004/jnccn.2009.0068
    [27] Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in shanghai: Final results[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2002, 94:1445-1457. doi:  10.1093/jnci/94.19.1445
    [28] Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: Should it be done? How?[J]. JAMA, 1999, 282:1270-1280. doi:  10.1001/jama.282.13.1270
    [29] Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer[J]. JAMA, 2008, 299:2151-2163. doi:  10.1001/jama.299.18.2151
    [30] Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening mri to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk[J]. JAMA, 2012, 307:1394-1404. doi:  10.1001/jama.2012.388
    [31] Berg WA, Bandos AI, Mendelson EB, et al. Ultrasound as the primary screening test for breast cancer: analysis from acrin 6666[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2016, 108. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26712110
    [32] Weigert J, Steenbergen S. The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts[J]. Breast J, 2015, 21:175-180. doi:  10.1111/tbj.12386
    [33] Shen S, Zhou Y, Xu Y, et al. A multi-centre randomised trial comparing ultrasound vs mammography for screening breast cancer in high-risk Chinese women[J]. Br J Cancer, 2015, 112:998-1004. doi:  10.1038/bjc.2015.33
    [34] Wang FL, Chen F, Yin H, et al. Effects of age, breast density and volume on breast cancer diagnosis: a retrospec-tive comparison of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography in China's rural areas[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2013, 14:2277-2282. doi:  10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.4.2277
    [35] Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2007, 57:75-89. doi:  10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1039
  • HTML全文浏览量:  329
  • PDF下载量:  832
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-04-10
  • 刊出日期:  2018-07-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    友情链接: 国家卫生健康委员会 北京协和医院 中国医学科学院 学术不端检测系统 国际知识资源总库 中国知网 术语在线 中国全科医学
    地址：北京市东城区帅府园1号 北京协和医院老楼7号楼
    3层302室 《协和医学杂志》编辑部
    电话：010-69154261/4262
    E - mail：medj@pumch.cn
    mjpumch@126.com
    期刊网站版权所有：《协和医学杂志》编辑部
    京ICP备 11002662

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计

    x 关闭 永久关闭

    【温馨提醒】近日，《协和医学杂志》编辑部接到作者反映，有多名不法人员冒充期刊编辑发送见刊通知，鼓动作者添加微信，从而骗取版面费的行为。特提醒您，本刊与作者联系的方式均为邮件通知或电话，稿件进度通知邮箱为：mjpumch@126.com，编辑部电话为：010-69154261，请提高警惕，谨防上当受骗！如有任何疑问，请致电编辑部核实。谢谢！