Application of Warming Humidification and Atomization Inhalation Technique for Patients with Endotracheal Intubation before Extubation
-
摘要:
目的 评价机械通气患者实施T管脱机阶段使用加温器进行热湿化的气道管理效果。 方法 将60例使用有创机械通气、经治疗后具备脱机指征的重症患者用简单随机法分为T管脱机组(对照组, 30例)和T管加温器脱机组(研究组, 30例), 对照组使用T管连接可调节输液器, 控制湿化液速度, 研究组在对照组的基础上, 使用加温器置于可调节输液器距T管10 cm处, 进行加温湿化。观察两组患者痰液黏稠度、刺激性咳嗽、气道出血、痰痂形成情况, 是否成功拔除气管插管, 血氧饱和度及平均带管时间。 结果 研究组在痰液黏稠度(P=0.03)、刺激性咳嗽(P=0.04)、气道出血(P=0.01)、痰痂形成(P=0.02)方面, 气道管理效果均明显优于对照组; 研究组血氧饱和度明显高于对照组(P=0.03), 平均带管时间明显低于对照组(P=0.01);两组拔管率差异无统计学意义(P=0.44)。 结论 T管加温湿化在机械通气患者试脱机阶段可有效稀释痰液, 减少气道并发症, 增加氧疗效果, 取得很好的气道管理效果。 Abstract:Objective To evaluation the airway management effect of mechanically ventilation patients at offline stage with the implementation of T tube warming humidification. Methods Sixty critically ill patients using mechanical ventilation and meeting the offline indications after treatment were randomly assigned to receive humidification with T tube (control group, 30 cases) or warming humidification with T tube (study group, 30 cases). The control group used T tube connected with the adjustable infusion device to control the humidification fluid velocity, whereas the study group used a heater placed at adjustable infusion set 10 cm from T tube to maintain the heat and humidity. Patients were observed for sputum viscosity, irritating cough, airway bleeding, phlegm scab formation, success rate of extubation, oxygen saturation, and average time with endotracheal intubation. Results Compared with the control group, the study group had significantly decreased sputum viscosity(P=0.03), irritating cough (P=0.04), airway bleeding (P=0.01), phlegm scab formation (P=0.02), increased oxygen saturation (P=0.03), and shorter average time with endotracheal intubation (P=0.01). The success rate of extubation between two groups had no significant difference (P=0.44). Conclusion T tube warming humidification in mechanically ventilated patients at offline stage can achieve good airway management by reducing airway irritation, decreasing sputum production, and enhancing the effectiveness of oxygen therapy. -
表 1 SLE患者急诊就诊时主诉症状分布[例(%)]
组别 痰液黏稠度[例(%)] 气道并发症[例(%)] 血氧饱和度
(%, x±s)平均带管时间
(h, x±s)拔管率
[例(%)]Ⅰ度 Ⅱ度 Ⅲ度 刺激性咳嗽 气道出血 痰痂形成 对照组(n=30) 6(20) 15 (50) 9(30) 19(63.3) 17(56.7) 11(36.7) 93.60±1.67 22.60±4.90 15(50) 研究组(n=30) 19(63.3) 7(23.3) 4(13.3) 8(26.7) 5(16.7) 5(16.7) 94.87±1.47 18.37±5.25 12(40) χ2值或t值 11.59 8.15 10.34 5.96 -3.14 2.69 0.61 P值 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.44 -
[1] 贺慧为, 陈志杨, 杨春丽.不同自主呼吸试验方式在机械通气患者撤机中的比较[J].江西医药, 2010, 45:1167-1169. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jxyy201012001 [2] 莫敏, 刘松桥, 杨毅.热湿交换器和加温湿化器对呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率影响的荟萃分析[J].中国危重病急救医学, 2011, 23:513-517. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgwzbjjyx201109001 [3] 李桂芹, 陈鸿茹.氧气湿化问题探讨[J].内蒙古医学杂志, 2006, 38:480-481. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=nmgyxzz200605047 [4] 张桂珍, 孙淑君, 朱菊娥.加温器与输液泵在气管插管气道湿化中的应用21例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志, 2008, 8:5776-5777 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgwzxzz200823241 [5] 周向群, 姜辉, 俞森洋.机械通气撤离的预测指标[J].国际呼吸杂志, 2007, 27:150-152. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gwyx-hxxt200702019 [6] 高治庆, 孙一芬, 宋晓华.患者拒绝吸氧的原因分析[J].临床肺科杂志, 2003, 8:182-183. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=lcfkzz200302067 [7] 卢卫宁, 崔彩萍, 吴有琳.重型颅脑损伤气管切开后气道湿化方法的效果观察[J].广西医学, 2009, 31:1378-1379. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gxyx200909084 [8] 蒋敏.机械通气时气道湿化的进展[J].中国危重病急救医学, 2012, 24:443-445. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgwzbjjyx201207021 [9] 俞森洋.现代机械通气的理论和实践[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社, 2000:709-719. [10] Stuart NR, Nigel R.Energy balance in the intubated human airway is an indicator of optimal gas conditioning[J].Crit Care Med, 2002, 30:355-361. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200202000-00015 [11] Fassassi M, Michel F.Airway humidification with a heat and moisture exchanger in mechanically ventilated neonates:a preliminary evaluation[J].Intensive Care Med, 2007, 33:336-343. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0466-1 [12] 聂清芳.加温湿化氧疗与气道内滴液的效果对比[J].内蒙古中医药, 2012, 31:166-167. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=nmgzyy201204176 [13] 杜桦, 桑娜娜, 郭纯.人工气道患者气道湿化方式的改进[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2010, 13:88. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hnsysjjbzz201019064 [14] 黄小琴.人工气道湿化方法的临床比较[J].中国中医急症, 2008, 17:130-132. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgzyjz200801094 [15] 刘小春.加温加湿给氧在ICU人工气道患者中的作用[J].右江民族医学院学报, 2004, 5:730. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yjmzyxyxb200405083 [16] Ward JJ.Medical gas therapy[M]//Buron GG.Respiratory care: a guide to clinical practice.Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1997: 335-404. [17] 季芳.3种加湿法对人工气道湿化效果的对比分析[J].局解手术学杂志, 2006, 15:310-311. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgjjssxzz200605010 [18] 宋志芳.现代呼吸机治疗学[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2002:239. [19] 英智.呼吸机的撤离[J].医学与哲学:临床决策论坛版, 2007, 28:12-14. [20] 王飞, 张新日.在呼吸机的撤离及影响因素临床分析的单因素logistic回归[J].山西医科大学学报, 2008, 38:454-457. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SXYX200805023.htm [21] 丁焕发, 王清峰, 吕秀艳.对气管切开患者应用微量泵控制持续气道湿化的临床意义[J].中国医药指南, 2011, 09:123-125. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgyyzn201101085 [22] Nishida T, Nishimura M, Fujino Y, et al.Performance of heated humidifiers with a heated wire according to ventilator settings[J].J Aerosol Med, 2001, 14:43-51. doi: 10.1089/08942680152007882 [23] 张志刚, 石斌, 魏花萍, 等.两种不同呼吸机加温加湿器对人工气道湿化效果的临床观察[J].生物医学工程与临床, 2010, 14:45-47. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=swyxgcylc201001012
点击查看大图
表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 137
- HTML全文浏览量: 42
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0