作者投稿
专家审稿
编辑办公
邮件订阅
RSS
Influence of Different Surgery Types and Ablation Ratios on the Change of Corneal Topography After Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery
-
摘要:
目的 探讨准分子激光角膜屈光手术中采用不同术式和切削比对术后角膜地形图参数变化的影响。 方法 选择2008年8月至2009年2月间在北京协和医院眼科接受准分子激光屈光手术治疗的患者52例(103眼), 按手术方式将患者分为准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术组(L组)27例53眼和新型表层屈光手术组(A组)25例50眼。两组中, 再按切削比分为亚组1(切削比≤ 0.15)和亚组2(切削比 > 0.15)。术前及术后第1周、1个月和3个月进行常规眼科检查, 包括角膜地形图检查, 测定指标包括角膜表面不规则指数(surface asymmetry index, SAI)、角膜表面规则指数(surface regu-larity index, SRI)、垂直子午线的角膜镜度数及其差值(Δsimulated keratoscopy reading, ΔSimK)和最大模拟角膜镜度数(simulated keratoscopy reading, SimK)等效值。分析不同术式组、不同切削比组之间术后角膜地形图参数变化的特点。 结果 在L 2和A2组术后各时期SAI与术前比较差异均存在统计学意义(P均=0.000), 而L1和A1组与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。在L 2组, 术后1周SRI较术前明显增加(P=0.010), 而术后1个月及3个月差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);在A2组, 术后1周及1个月SRI均较术前明显增加(P=0.000, P=0.005), 而术后3个月差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);在L1和A1组术后各时期与术前比较差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。在各组中, 术后各时期ΔSimK及SimK等效值较术前均明显下降(P均=0.000)。术后SAI和ΔSimK的变化受手术方式和切削比的共同影响(P均 < 0.05), 而SRI和SimK等效值的变化仅受切削比的影响(P均 < 0.05)。 结论 准分子激光角膜屈光手术后角膜地形图参数均发生一定程度的变化, 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后的变化程度大于新型表层屈光手术, 且切削比越大, 变化程度越大。 -
关键词:
- 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术 /
- 表层屈光手术 /
- 角膜地形图
Abstract:Objective To analyze the change of corneal topography after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and the influence of surgery types and ablation ratios. Methods A total of 52 myopic patients (103 eyes) underwent excimer laser refractive surgery in our hospital from August 2008 to February 2009. The patients were grouped by the type of surgery:laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) group (27 patients, 53 eyes) and advanced surface ablation (ASA) group (25 cases, 50 eyes). In both groups, the patients were subgrouped by ablation depth/corneal thickness ratio (AD/CT):subgroup 1 (AD/CT ≤ 0.15) and subgroup 2 (AD/CT > 0.15). Routine ophthalmological examinations and corneal topography were performed before operation and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after operation. The main outcome measures included surface asymmetry index (SAI), surface regularity index (SRI), Δsimulated keratoscopy reading (ΔSimK), and simulated keratoscopy reading (SimK). Results In subgroups L2 and A2, all the three postoperative SAI values improved significantly compared with preoperative values (P=0.000), but not in subgroups L1 and A1 (P>0.05). In subgroup L2, the SRI value improved significantly 1 week after surgery (P=0.010), but not after 1 month and 3 months (P > 0.05). In subgroup A2, the SRI values improved significantly 1 week and 1 month after surgery (P=0.000, P=0.005), but not after 3 months (P > 0.05). The SRI showed no significant difference among different time points in both subgroup L1 and A1 (P > 0.05). In all patients, both ΔSimK and SimK equivalent value decreased significantly after the operation (P=0.000). The changes of SAI and ΔSimK were influenced by both surgery type and the ablation ratio (P < 0.05), while the changes of SRI and SimK equivalent only by ablation ratio (P < 0.05). Conclusions The postoperative corneal topographic parameters change after excimer laser refractive surgery. The changes after LASIK are larger than those after advanced surface ablation, and the changes increase with the ablation ratio. -
Key words:
- laser in situ keratomileusis /
- surface ablation /
- corneal topography
-
表 1 准分子激光屈光手术患者基本资料($\bar x \pm s $)
表 2 各组患者术前及术后角膜地形图参数($\bar x \pm s $)
表 3 各组患者术后各时期角膜地形图参数变化值的多因素方差分析结果($\bar x \pm s $)
-
[1] Pavan-Langston D. Manual of ocular diagnosis and therapy[M]. Hagerstown:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007:405. [2] Liu Z, Li Y, Cheng Z, et al. Seven-year follow-up of lasik for moderate to severe myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008, 24:935-940. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20081101-13 [3] Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery:2004 ISRS/AAO Survey[J]. J Refract Surg, 2005, 21:742-748. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20051101-14 [4] Pallikaris IG, Kalyvianaki MI, Katsanevaki VJ, et al. EpiLASIK:preliminary clinical results of an alternative surface ablation procedure[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, 31:879-885. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.052 [5] Hondur A, Bilgihan K, Hasanreisoglu B. A prospective bilateral comparison of epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008, 24:928-934. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20081101-12 [6] Morrow GL, Stein RM. Evaluation of corneal topography:past, present and future trends[J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 1992, 27:213-225. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/1393805 [7] Brody J, Waller S, Wagoner M. Corneal topography:history, technique, and clinical uses[J]. Int Ophthalmol Clin, 1994, 34:197-207. doi: 10.1097/00004397-199403430-00018 [8] Fowler CW, Dave TN. Review of past and present techniques of measuring corneal topography[J]. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 1994, 14:49-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00556.x [9] Pholshivin P, Tangpagasit W. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymeter, optical coherence tomography and corneal topography[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2012, 95:123-128. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.1080/02713683.2018.1461910 [10] Srivannaboon S, Chotikavanich S, Chirapapaisan C, et al. Precision analysis of posterior corneal topography measured by Visante Omni:repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement with Orbscan Ⅱ[J]. J Refract Surg, 2012, 28:133-138. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111122-03 [11] Módis L Jr, Szalai E, Kolozsvári B, et al. Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography[J]. Cornea, 2012, 31:36-41. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318204c666 [12] Scerrati E. Laser in situ keratomileusis vs. laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASIK vs. LASEK)[J]. J Refract Surg, 2001, 17:S219-S221. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=d313ae98d65bcd13726686d2e346ef8c [13] Andreassen TT, Simonsen AH, Oxlund H. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas[J]. Exp Eye Res, 1980, 31:435-441. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4835(80)80027-3 [14] Charman WN. Mismatch between flap and stromal areas after laser in situ keratomileusis as source of flap striae[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002, 28:2146-2152. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01636-X [15] Ustundag C, Bahcecioglu H, Ozdamar A, et al. Optical coherence tomography for evaluation of anatomical changes in the cornea after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2000, 26:1458-1462. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00558-7 [16] de Benito-Llopis L, Teus MA, Sanchez-Pina JM, et al. Comparison between LASEK and LASIK for the correction of low myopia[J]. J Refract Surg, 2007, 23:139-145. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=d8a0c876ceb04a179afc379a4745f2fb [17] Chen MC, Lee N, Bourla N, et al. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008, 34:1886-1891. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.035 [18] Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, et al. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2008, 34:2049-2056. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.021 [19] Brenner LF, Alió JL, Vega-Estrada A, et al. Clinical grading of post-LASIK ectasia related to visual limitation and predictive factors for vision loss[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2012, 38:1817-1826. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.041 [20] Lee DH, Seo S, Jeong KW, et al. Early spatial changes in the posterior corneal surface after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29:778-784. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01842-4 [21] Baek TM, Lee KH, Tomidokoro A, et al. Corneal irregular astigmatism after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2001, 85:534-536. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.5.534 [22] Anera RG, Castro JJ, Jiménez JR, et al. Optical quality and visual discrimination capacity after myopic LASIK with a standard and aspheric ablation profile[J]. Refract Surg, 2011, 27:597-601. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110303-01 [23] Bühren J, Nagy L, Yoon G, et al. The effect of the asphericity of myopic laser ablation profiles on the induction of wavefr ont aberrations[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2010, 51:2805-2812. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4604 -
点击查看大图
表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 94
- HTML全文浏览量: 32
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
